Specificity in Getting Ms Drg Assignment Just Right

Specificity in Getting MS-DRG Assignment Just Right

I wanted to write today about the Coding Clinic from the American Hospital Association for the third quarter of 2020 – specifically, pages 28-29, titled “Right middle cerebral artery infarction and bilateral carotid artery occlusion,” which has a question about coding the diagnosis. The provider documented that the right carotid artery stenotic plaque caused the right middle cerebral artery infarction.

The Coding Clinic response was to code the cerebral artery infarction due to right carotid artery stenosis/occlusion. The stenosis/occlusion of the left carotid artery should also be coded.

I found this advice very helpful when reviewing payor denials. If a coder assigns a diagnosis code for the infarction of the right middle artery (I63.511), in addition to the infarction of the right carotid artery (I63.231), then it is labeled inappropriate if the Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group (MS-DRG) assigned is MS-DRG 64 (Intracranial hemorrhage or cerebral infarction with MCC). The second infarction code adds a Major Complication/Comorbid Condition (MCC). As I talked to other coders, I found that they were unaware of this Coding Clinic guidance.

The financial impact is not insignificant. Assuming a facility blended rate of $5,000, the reimbursement for MS-DRGs 64 through 66 is shown in the table below:

MS-DRGDescriptionRelative WeightReimbursement
64Intracranial hemorrhage or cerebral infarction w/MCC2.003$10,015.00
65Intracranial hemorrhage or cerebral infarction w/CC1.0164$5,082.00
66Intracranial hemorrhage or cerebral infarction w/o MCC/CC0.6875$3,437.50

The reimbursement swing is more than $6,500 for each case that is incorrectly coded.

My goal in talking about this Coding Clinic citation is to make you aware of its existence and for coders to be proactive and avoid assigning two stroke codes where only one is needed. It is important to also assign codes for the occlusions. Proactivity will avoid needless payor denials. I also think that there may be opportunities for physician queries and/or education. The physician should document, if possible, which occlusion/stenosis is responsible for the patient’s stroke.

Inpatient coding and MS-DRG optimization are like the tale of Goldilocks. It should be just right where the hospital gets the exact reimbursement that it deserves for treating the patient.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 19, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24