Sound Physicians Industry Report Explores Rising Risks to Appropriate Hospital Reimbursement

Physician

Survey data suggests that hospital executives, physician advisors, and case managers are not always on the same page.

Sound Physicians‘ recent nationwide survey provides insights into the barriers hospital case managers, utilization review teams, physician advisors, and hospital executives face in achieving their goals – and the potential for physician advisory programs to deliver solutions.

Hospitals are under mounting pressure to maintain their financial health while improving health outcomes for their patients and maintaining a satisfied and stable workforce. Not surprisingly, survey respondents placed high importance on financial health. Their top focus areas link to efficiency and dollars – appropriate reimbursement, shorter lengths of stay, and fewer denials. But the survey data suggests that hospital executives, physician advisors, and case managers are not always on the same page – or even fully aware of gaps – when it comes to the communication, workflows, and documentation required to improve these key metrics.

These gaps put hospitals at greater risk. For example, over 60 percent of respondents reported a rise in observation rates, but approximately 40 percent were unsure of their percentage of observation discharges, including those performed as Medicare fee-for-service. And 45 percent of hospital executives were uncertain of their annual denial write-off amount.

Getting initial patient status correct and moving these patients to inpatient status, when appropriate (or transferring them safely out of the hospital), is a critical challenge. With pay rates for observation discharges being $3,000 to $6,000 less than an inpatient stay with comparable care, the risk is clear. It makes observation versus inpatient status the new battle line for appropriate and fair reimbursement, particularly since many resources are devoted early in a stay for sick patients who present to the hospital with acute – but yet undiagnosed – symptoms.

To align the goals for a patient’s stay, case managers, physician advisors, and attending physicians need timely communication and documentation about who is in a bed and what their current status is. Well-defined role responsibilities are essential to efficient workflow and accurate patient status. Yet, our report found that 25 percent of case managers find it challenging to get the input they need from the attending physician to change status. Furthermore, there was a range in responses for how quickly an advisor can review a case, how many cases they should review in relationship to total bed capacity, and other key functions.

Our survey results are sparking conversations within hospitals and prompting the discovery of risk for higher denials and lower reimbursement, because documentation, workflows, roles, and behaviors are often unclear and connected. Physician advisors deliver significant value by improving communication and workflow efficiency to prevent low reimbursement and denials in the first place. They have the expertise to support accurate status determinations, turn secondary reviews around quickly, ensure documentation integrity, and even overturn denials. They can provide the resources, go-to knowledge, and leadership to bridge these gaps and effectively connect utilization management and revenue cycle.

Working as an integral member of the hospital team, the physician advisor can be a catalyst for change that significantly improves patient outcomes, staff retention, and hospitals’ financial health. So, with props to David Glaser, it seems that hospitals still haven’t found what they’re looking for in their pursuit of the perfect physician advisory program.

You can download a copy of the full survey report here.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Print

Chris Shearer, MD, MPH

Dr. Chris Shearer, MD, MPH, completed his undergraduate and medical school degrees at Northwestern University in the Honors Program in Medical Education. Dr. Shearer worked as a family medicine physician for over 15 years before moving into hospital and organization leadership roles, including Medical Director of Advisory Services for 2 years. He now serves as Sound Physicians Chief Medical Offer for their physician advisory programs.

Related Stories

CDI Operational Performance: A Construct

CDI Operational Performance: A Construct

I recently engaged in a fascinating discussion with Dr. Jake Martin on the “Top 10 Key Components of An Effective CDI Program,” involving thoughts on

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Good Faith Estimates Under the No Surprises Act: Compliance and Best Practices

Mastering Good Faith Estimates Under the No Surprises Act: Compliance and Best Practices

The No Surprises Act (NSA) presents a challenge for hospitals and providers who must provide Good Faith Estimates (GFEs) for all schedulable services for self-pay and uninsured patients. Compliance is necessary, but few hospitals have been able to fully comply with the requirements despite being a year into the NSA. This webcast provides an overview of the NSA/GFE policy, its impact, and a step-by-step process to adhere to the requirements and avoid non-compliance penalties.

Mastering E&M Guidelines: Empowering Providers for Accurate Service Documentation and Scenario Understanding in 2023

Mastering E&M Guidelines: Empowering Providers for Accurate Service Documentation and Scenario Understanding in 2023

This expert-guided webcast will showcase tips for providers to ensure appropriate capture of the work performed for a visit. Comprehensive examples will be given that demonstrate documentation gaps and how to educate providers on the documentation necessary to appropriately assign a level of service. You will gain clarification on answers regarding emergency department and urgent care coding circumstances as well as a review of how/when it is appropriate to code for E&M in radiology and more.

June 21, 2023
Breaking Down the Proposed IPPS Rule for FY 2024: Top Impacts You Need to Know

Breaking Down the Proposed IPPS Rule for FY 2024: Top Impacts You Need to Know

Set yourself up for financial and compliance success with expert guidance that breaks down the impactful changes including MS-DRG methodology, surgical hierarchy updates, and many new technology add-on payments (NTAPs). Identify areas of potential challenge ahead of time and master solutions for all 2024 Proposed IPPS changes.

May 24, 2023

Trending News