Six Critical Tips for 2025 Thrombolysis Coding

As 2026 approaches, interventional radiology teams face mounting pressure from coding overhauls and tightening reimbursement rules—especially for complex procedures like catheter-directed thrombolysis. The storm of economic turbulence and uncertainty looming over 2026 makes IR coding especially vulnerable, with expert insight a necessary tool to tighten down accuracy and secure compliance. Thrombolysis, a life-saving therapy that dissolves dangerous clots directly within arteries or veins, involves multiple stages, prolonged infusions, and intricate documentation requirements. Even minor coding missteps could deliver major revenue losses and compliance consequences. Let’s cut through the complexity and prepare for the evolving thrombolysis coding landscape ahead.

Expert Tips in Action

1.) First, understand that codes 37211 and 37212 do NOT include catheterization, diagnostic angiograms, or other interventions. Codes for those services should only be added when appropriate. CPT® describes conditions for coding a diagnostic angiogram S&I during the same session as an intervention. Code 76937 for ultrasound guidance for vascular access may also be coded when performed and documented according to code description requirements. E&M visits to the patient on the day of, and related to, thrombolysis are included and not separately coded.

The following codes are assigned per calendar day and include all imaging and catheter repositioning and/or exchanges required on that day, regardless of how many times the patient is brought back for follow-up. Be aware that you should not assign 75898 for follow-up angiography during thrombolytic infusions.

2.) Coders should note that the thrombolysis codes are unilateral, so if bilateral thrombolysis is performed through separate accesses, add modifier 50 to the appropriate code. Modifiers continuously prove to be a challenging area for coders, resulting in widespread billing errors, so knowing how to apply the correct modifier is especially important. With that in mind, be careful that if two completely separate vascular beds, such as the renal artery and femoral artery, are treated, you should add modifier 59 to the appropriate thrombolysis codes.

Although not specifically noted in the CPT manual, when these codes were introduced during the CPT Symposium, AMA speakers indicated that these thrombolysis infusion codes are to be assigned for prolonged infusions: the patient must leave the treatment room with the infusion running.

3.) Be vigilant about the circumstances when the code should be not applied. Do not assign a thrombolysis infusion code for an injection of a thrombolytic agent during a mechanical thrombectomy procedure. Do not report the following codes for intracranial arterial thrombolysis, see code 61645 instead.

37211Transcatheter therapy, arterial infusion for thrombolysis other than coronary or intracranial, any method, including radiological supervision and interpretation, initial treatment day
37212Transcatheter therapy, venous infusion for thrombolysis, any method, including radiological supervision and interpretation, initial treatment day

4.) When coding for thrombolysis, it’s important to know which codes to assign for different treatment scenarios. For the initiation of thrombolysis and any same-day follow-up evaluations, imaging, or catheter repositioning/exchanges, use codes 37211 or 37212. Code 37211 is specific to arterial thrombolysis, while 37212 is used for venous thrombolysis. If the procedure starts and finishes on the same day, you’ll only report the initial treatment day using the appropriate code. This distinction is key for ensuring accurate billing and documentation when managing thrombolysis cases.

37213Transcatheter therapy, arterial or venous infusion for thrombolysis other than coronary, any method, including radiological supervision and interpretation, continued treatment on subsequent day during course of thrombolytic therapy, including followup catheter contrast injection, position change, or exchange, when performed;

5.) Under the circumstances a thrombolysis procedure lasts three or more days, each day except the initial day and the last day should be reported with code 37213. It may be assigned for either arterial or venous thrombolysis, and it includes any work related to the thrombolytic procedure on the same calendar day.

37214Transcatheter therapy, arterial or venous infusion for thrombolysis other than coronary, any method, including radiological supervision and interpretation, continued treatment on subsequent day during course of thrombolytic therapy, including follow up catheter contrast injection, position change, or exchange, when performed; cessation of thrombolysis including removal of catheter and vessel closure by any method

6.) The last day of a thrombolysis procedure is reported with code 37214. As with 37211, 37212, and 37213, this code is assigned per calendar day and includes any follow-up exams, catheter repositioning and/or exchanges. Removal of the catheter and closure of the access site are included in 37214.

 ⚠️ Your 2025 IR Coding Remains Under Threat, Creating Significant Risk to Your Bottom Line. These Are NOT All the Tips and Tricks Necessary for Success. 

With every dollar of reimbursement counting more than ever in the face of payment decline and complex changes, it’s imperative to make sure your CPT® coding is correct and compliant. Master more coding topics and break down the complexity with our 2025 Venous Studies Interventional Radiology Coding live on October 15, 2025, or on demand past this date. This webcast is an essential training tool for both audio and visual learners.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Bryan Nordley

Bryan Nordley is a seasoned professional writer, strategist, and researcher with over a decade’s worth of combined experience. Bryan launched his professional health writing career at the University of British Columbia’s Faculty of Medicine, one of the top 30 faculty of medicine programs in the world, working under the School of Public Health as a communications assistant. From there, he expanded his expertise and knowledge into private healthcare and podiatry before taking the role of healthcare writer at MedLearn Media. Bryan is the lead writer for the MedLearn Publishing brand previously producing both the acclaimed radiology and laboratory compliance manager newsletter products, while currently writing the compliance questions of the week which reach over 10,000 subscribers, creating the MedLearn Publishing Insights blogs and collaborating with operations and nationally renowned subject matter experts, in addition to serving as an editor for a variety of MedLearn publications along with marketing initiatives. Bryan continues to keep his pulse on the latest healthcare industry news, analyzing and reporting with strategic insight.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24