Some SDoH conditions are more likely than other to be impactful on healthcare consumption.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) unveiled the fiscal year (FY) FY 2023 Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) Final Rule in early August.
The agency included a discussion about Social Determinants of Health (SDoH), defined as “the conditions in the environments where people are born, live, learn, work, play, worship, and age that affect a wide range of health functioning, and quality-of-life outcomes and risks.” It is recognized that SDoH “influence an individual’s health status and can contribute to wide health disparities and inequities.”
They can be important risk factors in developing medical conditions like heart disease, diabetes, and obesity.
There is, however, a fundamental catch-22 regarding the documentation, coding, and recording of SDoH. In the big healthcare picture, they are very influential, but they may not be thought to affect the resource consumption during a hospital admission.
So why should hospitals invest the time and resources to capture SDoH data? But if hospitals don’t capture SDoH codes, we may not be able to identify how prevalent the conditions are in hospitalized patients. If we can’t recognize how frequently they occur and in which patients, we may not be able to appreciate their impact on the hospitalized patient. We can’t tell if those conditions have increased the length of stay or required significant social work or utilization review/case management planning if we are not recording and coding them.
Homelessness is a concrete example of this. It is one of the more commonly reported SDoH codes but it is still believed to be underreported. The Z59.0- category was recently expanded to include sheltered, unsheltered, and unspecified homelessness. Homelessness had been proposed (but tabled) to become a comorbid condition or complication (CC), but the calculation to determine whether it is CC-worthy is being impacted by underreporting of the condition.
The data of SDoH is important to collect for many reasons. There needs to be an incentive or a simple way to collect the data. One of the objections is that there is a limited number of diagnoses which can be entered on a claim, and folks are reluctant to use up some of those precious line-items on non-medical conditions. Comments were also made about the benefit of screening for SDoH if there is no mechanism to make referrals or to connect patients to resources to address their needs. There was also a concern that there may be a stigma associated with SDoH, and patients may be hesitant to share that information.
People are not familiar with all 73.5 thousand ICD-10-CM codes. They likely don’t know all the codes which are housed in the Z55-Z65 categories which comprise the SDoH. I am not sure the hospital personnel need be acquainted with or elicit every SDoH condition.
However, there is a list of SDoH conditions which I think are likely to be more impactful on the healthcare consumption and equity playing field. Here is my list:
CMS is still sorting this out, and I will be interested to see where facilities and providers end up landing on collecting SDoH data. I hope they figure out a time-efficient and standardized manner that does not create undue burden.
There may be a benefit not only to the individual patient, but also to the health system in general.
Programming note: Listen to Dr. Erica Remer every Tuesday morning when she cohosts Talk Ten Tuesdays with Chuck Buck at 10 Eastern.
Clinical documentation integrity (CDI) professionals and inpatient coders understand the relationship between the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) and hospital reimbursement. However, they may be
The U.S. Department of Education’s implementation of President Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) has triggered one of the most consequential – and controversial
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
