Large employers will not have to enforce a mandate, but healthcare entities will.
Last Thursday, the Supreme Court said yes to one of the Biden Administration’s vaccine mandates, and no to another.
In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court temporarily halted the Biden Administration’s vaccine-or-test mandate that would have applied to private companies with 100 or more employees, sending it back to the lower courts for continued litigation. In general, the opinion from the Court was that a federal agency like the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) did not have the authority to mandate sweeping requirements that could so broadly affect local and state economies.
In contrast, the Court did allow the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) vaccine mandate that applies to facilities across the country that are paid by Medicare or Medicaid. In considering the CMS vaccine mandate, the court decided that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) was within its statutory authority to require vaccination. The CMS mandate, too, will continue to be litigated in the lower courts; the Supreme Court in this case simply did not stop the mandate from going forward while it is moving through them.
As a reminder, the CMS vaccine mandate requires that healthcare facilities participating in Medicare or Medicaid are fully vaccinated. Facilities include hospitals, of course, but also nursing homes, home health agencies, hospices, and ambulatory surgical centers, among others.
There are exemptions for employees allowed based on religious beliefs or recognized medical conditions, but there are no exemptions for an employee to test to get out of the vaccination.
Now, just to complicate things, the effective date for the CMS vaccine mandate differs depending on what state the facility is in.
In the 25 states that did not actually challenge the law, hospital employees have to be fully vaccinated by Feb. 28, according to CMS guidance published last Friday.
For the 24 states that challenged the CMS mandate, hospital employees must be fully vaccinated by March 15.
And then there’s Texas, where a preliminary injunction is still in place, so the Supreme Court’s recent decision did not apply. So at this time, facilities in Texas should not make any efforts to implement the rule, according to the CMS guidance.
If you’re now completely confused by the compliance dates, please check out the CMS guidance published on Friday. Frankly, the guidance is confusing too, but at least it’s written down somewhere.
Now, the Supreme Court did not consider the Biden Administration’s third vaccine mandate directed at all federal employees, contractors, and subcontractors. However, that federal employee mandate has been temporarily halted across the country by a lower court, so it too is not going forward at this time.
To reiterate, the Supreme Court last week made what was really just a temporary decision on both the CMS mandate and the OSHA vaccine-or-test mandate, allowing the CMS mandate to go forward and stopping the OSHA mandate.
However, all three mandates will continue to be litigated at lower courts and may even be heard again by the Supreme Court in the future.
The whole issue of vaccine mandates is a fascinating tug-of-war between our three government branches, executive, judicial, and legislative. However, these three mandates together could affect the lives of over 110 million workers. That’s a lot of lives to tug around.
Programming Note: Listen to Matthew Albright’s live reports on federal regulations Mondays on Monitor Mondays 10 Eastern, sponsored by Zelis.
As the federal government shutdown drags into its fifth week, the collapse of key safety-net supports such as nutrition benefits, health-insurance subsidies, and the disruption
With so much focus within the federal government on abuse, fraud, and waste, I thought it might be helpful to review a couple of federal
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
