CMS pledging improved healthcare quality and expanded access for patients.
The release of the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) proposed rule for the 2020 fiscal year came with a bit of branding.
“Rethinking Rural Health” and “Unleashing Innovations” were the two catchy slogans unveiled by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in a press release on the topic issued earlier this week, with the agency heralding what it said would constitute “historic changes” to federal involvement in healthcare.
“One in five Americans are living in rural areas, and the hospitals that serve them are the backbone of our nation’s healthcare system,” CMS Administrator Seema Verma said in a statement.
“Rural Americans face many obstacles as the result of our fragmented healthcare system, including living in communities with disproportionally higher poverty rates, more chronic conditions, and more uninsured or underinsured individuals. The Trump Administration is committed to addressing inequities in healthcare, which is why we are proposing historic Medicare payment changes that will help bring stability to rural hospitals and improve patients’ access to quality healthcare.”
CMS noted that the inpatient hospital wage index specifies how inpatient payment rates are adjusted to account for local differences in wages that hospitals face in their respective labor markets, saying the proposed changes are “intended to measure differences in hospital wage rates across geographic regions” and will update “annually based on wage data reported by hospitals.”
“Hospitals located in areas with wages less than the national average receive a lower Medicare payment rate than hospitals located in areas with wages higher than the national average,” the CMS release explained. “For example, a hospital in a rural community could receive a Medicare payment of about $4,000 for treating a beneficiary admitted for pneumonia while a hospital in a high wage area (like many urban communities) could receive a Medicare payment of nearly $6,000 for the same case, due to differences in their wage index.”
As such, and in response to feedback it received in the form of comments, CMS said that to “address these disparities, (it) is proposing to increase the wage index of low wage index hospitals. This change would ensure that people living in rural areas have access to high-quality, affordable healthcare.”
The press release didn’t elaborate, saying it is “considering several ways” to implement the plan and adding that it plans to solicit additional comments.
CMS’s remarks on its plans on making “Unleashing Innovations” a top priority were more substantive, although still a bit light on specifics.
“To ensure that Medicare payment supports broad access to transformative technologies, CMS is proposing several payment policy changes. These include proposing to increase the new technology add-on payment, which provides hospitals with additional payments for cases with high costs involving new technologies, including potentially new antimicrobial therapies,” the press release read. “The increase would apply to all technologies receiving add-on payments starting on Oct. 1, 2019, so that when a physician determines that a patient needs a qualifying new therapy, the hospital at which the therapy is administered would be able to more completely cover its costs. This change would promote patient access and reduce the uncertainty that innovators face regarding payment for new medical technologies for Medicare beneficiaries.”
CMS also noted that it is proposing to modernize payment policies for medical devices that meet the FDA’s (Food and Drug Administration’s) Breakthrough Devices designation.
“For devices granted expedited approval, real-world data regarding outcomes for the devices in different patient populations is often limited. At the time of approval, it can be challenging for innovators to meet the requirement for evidence demonstrating ‘substantial clinical improvement’ in order to qualify for new technology add-on payments,” CMS said. “Therefore, CMS is proposing to waive for two years the requirement for evidence that these devices represent a ‘substantial clinical improvement.’ Waiving this requirement would provide additional Medicare payment for the technologies for a period of time while real-world evidence is emerging, so Medicare beneficiaries do not have to wait for access to the latest innovations.”
“Transformative technologies are coming to the private market, but Medicare’s antiquated payment systems have not contemplated these technologies,” Verma added. “I am particularly concerned about cases that have been reported to the agency in which Medicare’s inadequate payment has led hospitals to curtail access to needed therapies. We must continually update our policies in response to the rapid pace of advancement in medical science.”
The last topic covered by the press release was what CMS labeled “unique challenges” associated with paying for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, the first form of gene therapy ever to see the widespread implementation, currently being used to treat certain forms of cancer for which no other treatment options exist.
“The agency is considering several changes to payment policies for CAR-T for 2020, including additional changes to new technology add-on payments for CAR-T and changes to the formula that is used to calculate payments to hospitals for CAR-T,” CMS said. “These changes may help ensure adequate payments to hospitals administering this groundbreaking therapy while CMS continues our work to ensure that we pay for innovative therapies appropriately.”
Dr. Ronald Hirsch (MD, FACP, CHCQM), vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at R1 Physician Advisory Services and a member of the Advisory Board of the American College of Physician Advisors and the American Case Management Association, described the proposed rule as a CFO’s dream.
“There is lots in the rule for finance folks, with changes to wage index calculations (big gains for rural hospitals and significant cuts for high-wage index hospitals), changes to new technology payments (up to 65 percent of cost, from 50 percent) … new quality measures, (a) new requirement for LTACHs (Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals) to get their special payment rate … (and) some DRG reassignments,” Hirsch said. “But these are all payment changes and not utilization changes.”
Indeed, Hirsch noted that there are no proposed changes to observation status, patient notifications, or the two-midnight rule.
“Now, if you are looking for some fun, start reading on page 110 to see how CMS analyzes a request for a DRG change; here they look at Mitraclip,” Hirsch added. “It’s an amazing analysis.”
Hirsch further noted that the proposed rule includes changes to complications and comorbidities (CCs) and major CCs (MCCs) for nearly 1,500 diagnoses – and, of particular note, that homelessness is proposed to be listed as a new CC.
Programming Note:
Listen to Laurie Johnson report this story live during Monitor Monday, April 29, 10-10:30 a.m. ET/
For a fact sheet on the proposed rule, go online to: https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/fiscal-year-fy-2020-medicare-hospital-inpatient-prospective-payment-system-ipps-and-long-term-acute
To view the proposed rule in its entirety, go online to: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/05/03/2019-08330/medicare-program-hospital-inpatient-prospective-payment-systems-for-acute-care-hospitals-and-the
Clinical documentation integrity (CDI) professionals work in a variety of settings, and although I mostly focus on topics related to hospital inpatient billing, this week
As the federal government shutdown drags into its fifth week, the collapse of key safety-net supports such as nutrition benefits, health-insurance subsidies, and the disruption
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
