The shift from fee-for-service to value-based care (VBC) is reshaping how healthcare organizations are reimbursed and evaluated. In this new environment, success hinges not only on how many services are rendered, but on the quality of those services, patient outcomes, and overall cost-effectiveness.
Amid this transformation, revenue integrity has become more complex and more critical than ever. Health information management (HIM) professionals are essential to navigating this complexity, playing a key role in identifying and correcting sources of revenue leakage that threaten both financial sustainability and clinical performance metrics.
What Is Revenue Leakage in a Value-Based Model?
Traditionally, “revenue leakage” referred to missed or unbilled charges. Today, it includes a much broader spectrum of documentation and coding vulnerabilities that directly affect reimbursement in alternative payment models.
It can stem from:
- Missed opportunities to document and code Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs) and other risk-adjusting diagnoses;
- Incomplete or non-discrete capture of quality measure components, leading to missed incentive payments or penalties;
- Under-reported severity of illness (SOI) or risk of mortality (ROM), impacting case mix index (CMI) and value-based benchmarks;
- Clinical documentation that does not clearly support services rendered, leading to denials, takebacks, or payor downgrades; and
- Lack of timely reconciliation between the electronic medical record (EMR), chargemaster, and billing systems.
In value-based models, this leakage not only affects revenue, but also distorts an organization’s reported quality performance, patient risk profile, and contractual compliance.
The HIM Professionals’ Expanding Responsibilities in the VBC Era
As payment models evolve, so too must HIM’s scope and strategy. The department is no longer just responsible for assigning accurate codes; it must serve as a strategic partner in revenue preservation, regulatory compliance, and quality alignment.
Core HIM contributions include the following:
- Risk Adjustment Coding
HIM professionals ensure that chronic conditions are captured each calendar year for accurate risk scoring in Accountable Care Organization (ACO) and Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) plans. This work supports fair payment under capitated or shared savings arrangements.
- Outpatient Clinical Documentation Integrity (CDI) Programs
Many risk-adjusting diagnoses originate in the outpatient setting. Outpatient CDI teams help close documentation gaps, query for specificity, and educate providers on the impact of chronic condition capture.
- Charge Integrity Oversight
Partnering with departments like pharmacy, radiology, and surgery, HIM leaders can identify where services are being performed but not billed due to workflow breakdowns, incorrect CPT/HCPCS assignment, or system mismatches.
- Clinical Validation and Denials Management
HIM teams review records for clinical integrity and proactively defend documentation that may be vulnerable to payor scrutiny, such as that documenting malnutrition, acute kidney injury, or encephalopathy.
- Data Governance and Quality Reporting
HIM supports reporting for the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS), Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), and hospital value-based programs by ensuring that documentation supports quality measures and that codes are accurately captured in extractable formats.
Strategic Tactics to Reduce Revenue Leakage
Reducing leakage requires a multifaceted approach.
Best practices include the following:
- Analytics-Driven Monitoring: Use dashboards to track missed charges, under-coded encounters, denials, CMI shifts, and risk score accuracy. Pair this with financial forecasting and provider scorecards.
- Pre-Visit Workflows: Integrate HIM into the pre-visit process by identifying documentation or coding gaps prior to patient appointments, allowing providers to address them in real time.
- Provider Engagement: Develop ongoing education regarding documentation that drives value-based performance, including MEAT (Monitored, Evaluated, Assessed, Treated) criteria, linking conditions, and documenting outcomes.
- Automation and artificial intelligence (AI): Leverage natural language processing and AI-assisted coding to flag risk-adjusting conditions, missed charges, and incomplete documentation proactively.
- Collaboration with Revenue Cycle: Align HIM, revenue integrity, billing, and compliance on shared goals, ensuring seamless reconciliation between what was done and what was billed.
ROI: HIM’s Impact on Clinical and Financial Outcomes
When HIM professionals are empowered and aligned with strategic goals, the return on investment is significant:
- Improved Risk Scores: Capturing accurate HCCs and chronic diagnoses ensures that organizations are reimbursed based on the true clinical complexity of their population.
- Stronger Quality Scores: HIM-driven documentation supports performance in pay-for-performance and public reporting programs.
- Fewer Denials and Downgrades: Clinical validation efforts reduce the frequency of coding-related takebacks.
- Enhanced Operational Efficiency: Streamlined documentation and coding workflows reduce rework, delays, and friction between departments.
Conclusion
As healthcare shifts toward value, HIM professionals must step into a broader, more proactive role. We are not just the gatekeepers of accurate coding. We are strategic collaborators, clinical interpreters, and financial guardians. By expanding our role into outpatient settings, risk adjustment, quality, and charge integrity, we can prevent revenue leakage and ensure that organizations are paid appropriately for the care they provide.
In the value-based world, every word matters, every condition counts, and HIM is the cornerstone that ties it all together.
Programming note:
Listen live today when Angela Comfort cohosts Talk Ten Tuesday with Chuck Buck, 10 am Eastern.
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.