The talk of the industry continues to be Aetna’s new policy regarding payment for inpatient admissions. If you have not heard, Aetna will approve all inpatient admissions for Medicare Advantage (MA) patients, but then only pay the inpatient rate for those patients who either have a stay of five days or more or when MCG© inpatient criteria are met. The others will get paid at a lower rate.
Yes, this policy has been reviewed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and they have no problems with it, because it meets the Two-Midnight Rule. When you ask for inpatient admission approval, they are giving it. How much you get paid for that admission is a contractual issue. And since patients get admitted as inpatients and get their inpatient rights, CMS is reportedly fine with it.
Because it is contractual, this should be addressed by finance to change the terms of the contract. But until then, when a notice of inpatient approval with a lower-severity payment comes in, you should do several things.
First, if they issue the notice before the fifth day, but the patient remains hospitalized for necessary care on Day 5 or longer, inform them of that. They should retract the notice and approve payment at the inpatient rate.
But if five hospital days have not passed, provide them with updated clinical information. In fact, provide them updated clinical information every day. They likely will run criteria the first day, approve inpatient care, but then record that MCG inpatient criteria were not met, so payment would be at the lower rate. But then on Day 2 and Day 3, the patient may have new clinical findings, but Aetna has no way to know that unless you update them.
And you likely will have to remind them that MCG criteria specify that under the Two-Midnight Rule, a patient who has had two medically necessary midnights of hospital care meets inpatient criteria.
Moving on, it’s been a while since we have talked about National Coverage Determinations (NCDs). But one NCD came up recently. The hospital had a patient with aortic stenosis, with a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) planned. The patient had severe aortic stenosis and was asymptomatic.
And herein lies the problem. The Sapien valves from Edwards Lifesciences are now Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for use in this situation, and the medical literature supports its placement before symptoms develop. But the Medicare NCD still requires the patient to be symptomatic. And as we all know, NCDs are binding, and the claim will be denied if all the criteria are not met.
This is a very difficult situation for the doctors and hospital; they want to do the right thing for the patient, but they would either have to do it for free or require the patient to pay $80,000.
Now, luckily, CMS has reopened the NCD to consider adding asymptomatic patients and removing the requirement to report data to a registry. But the timeline provided suggests no decision for six months.
Now, if you are doing TAVRs, you might want to talk to your cardiologists about this. The comment period has closed, so for now, all they can do is wait and hope their asymptomatic patients remain asymptomatic. And for non-Medicare and MA patients, check the payer policy.
You can only hope they have adjusted their coverage policy to match the FDA indication and current standard of care.
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.
EDITOR’S NOTE: Artificial intelligence was utilized for structural refinement and grammatical editing. All analyses, interpretations, and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of
EDITOR’S NOTE: The author of this article used artificial intelligence- (AI)-assisted tools in its composition, but all content, analysis, and conclusions were based on the
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
