The 2023 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) rule has arrived, released by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) on Tuesday, July 7, 2022. Radiology will once again experience a threat to payments as the pandemic continues to bring consequences for healthcare. As usual, the proposed rule outlines potential updates to a variety of policies and provisions that dictate payment for many services included in the Quality Payment Program (QPP), the Merit-Based Incentives Payment System (MIPS), and Advanced Alternative Payment Models (APMs). Keep in mind that these policies are proposed and will not be made final until the release of the final rule.
Once again, CMS has greeted healthcare with a woefully contradictory view for radiology of the proposed rule with CMS Administrator Chiquita Brooks-LaSure stating: “At CMS, we are constantly striving to expand access to high quality, comprehensive healthcare for people served by the Medicare program. Today’s proposals expand access to vital medical services like behavioral healthcare, dental care, and cancer treatment options, all while promoting access, innovation, and cost savings in the Medicare program.”
To further explain the conversation factor and the decision-making CMS went on to explain, “We are proposing a series of standard technical proposals involving practice expense, including the implementation of the second year of the clinical labor pricing update. We have also included a comment solicitation seeking public input as we develop a more consistent, predictable approach to incorporating new data in setting PFS rates. We hope to implement changes that will promote transparency and predictability in payment amounts. Per statutory requirements, we are also updating the data that we use to develop the geographic practice cost indices (GPCIs) and malpractice RVUs.”
However, the radiology community is about to be set for another year of reimbursement suffering if the proposed rule becomes final law or if further legislation isn’t passed. For 2023, CMS is projecting a conversion factor of $33.0775 as opposed to the 2022 conversion factor of $34.6062. The ACR notes that the calculations were made by “first removing the one-year 3 percent increase provided by the Protecting Medicare and American Farmers from Sequester Cuts Act and then applying a negative 1.55 percent budget neutrality update. The budget neutrality update appear to be largely related to increased values for several evaluation and management code families, including hospital, emergency medicine, nursing facility and home visits.”
This seemingly small decrease has a biting impact to radiology reimbursement. CMS projects a decrease of three percent for radiology. For interventional radiology a sharper aggregate decrease of four percent is expected. Nuclear medicine will see a blow of three percent. Meanwhile radiation oncology and radiation therapy centers will brace for a one percent decrease. Some circumstances around the decrease remain the adjustments in relative value units (RVUs) along with the second year of the transition to clinical labor pricing updates according to the College’s analysis. Furthermore, the ACR warns that “If Congress does not intervene to extend the three percent increase provided by the Protecting Medicare and American Farmers from Sequester Cuts Act, the percent decreases mentioned above will be greater for CY 2023.”
CMS is looking to make changes to the colorectal cancer screening services. Even more, they are examining policy updates to correlate with those updates that occurred with the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). The USPSTF is looking to have screening start at age 45 as opposed to age 50. According to the ACR, “CMS proposed to expand the definition of colorectal cancer screening to include a follow-up screening colonoscopy after a positive result on a Medicare covered non-invasive stool-based screening test. CMS believes this would reduce screening barriers by ensuring patients will not be responsible for cost sharing for the additional test.”
However, the proposed policies fail to include any trace of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening. The ACR notes that “CMS recently responded to the ACR’s formal reconsideration request that there is not sufficient evidence to support changing the current noncoverage determination for CT colonography. The ACR will meet with CMS in the near future to discuss its rationale for the decision.”
These are not all the impacts of the proposed PFS policy. Explore more regulatory, policy, and coding knowledge to master compliance and coding with our monthly Radiology Compliance Manager.
Information Sources:
https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Advocacy/AIA/ACR-Preliminary-Summary-2023-MPFS-PR-FINAL.pdf
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has launched the Rural Health Transformation (RHT) Program, a $50 billion, five-year federal initiative to strengthen healthcare
EDITOR’S NOTE: The author of this article used AI-assisted tools in its composition, but all content, analysis, and conclusions were based on the author’s professional
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
