I have whined in a previous RACmonitor enews article about how the importance given to the admission order in today’s healthcare industry makes absolutely no sense. It’s not an order for a medication or a test, wherein if it is transcribed incorrectly, the patient could be physically harmed. The admission order is different. It is for payment, and simply a way to determine if hospital care will be paid by DRG or APC.
So, why the fuss? Because the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) says so. And when CMS says something, we must listen.
When in 2013, as part of the 2014 Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) rule sub-regulatory guidance, the agency said the admission order needs authentication prior to discharge, we listened. And many hospitals self-denied admissions because of the lack of that authentication – perfectly good admissions with no revenue because of the absence of one click by a physician.
And when the Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) and Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs) started the two-midnight probe-and-educate audits, that was the first thing they did: they looked for the admission order, then the date and time of the authentication of that order.
No authentication prior to discharge meant an automatic technical denial, with no way to appeal. So for four years, inpatient admissions that complied with all the other regulations were denied simply because of the authentication.
But as you know, CMS has fixed that, as of Oct. 1. Authentication prior to discharge will no longer be a requirement.
Now, why did CMS change the rule? Well, as CMS itself said, “when we finalized the admission order documentation requirements in past rulemaking and guidance, it was not our intent that admission order documentation requirements should, by themselves, lead to the denial of payment for medically reasonable and necessary inpatient stay.”
Unfortunately, they did not tell that to the MACs or the QIOs. In fact, the QIOs are in regular contact with CMS, discussing their audit results, so that means CMS had to have known there were many of these denials.
Which leads me to the point of this article. While we wait for Oct. 1 to arrive, the QIOs continue to audit short stays and deny for lack of timely authentication. There is no reason for them to wait until Oct. 1; they should stop these denials immediately. When CMS states that it was never their intent, that means that for the last four years, even though the manual and their guidance stated it was a requirement, in CMS’s eyes, these denials should not have occurred.
So if they are admitting now that the MACs and QIOs misinterpreted their intent, why would we need to wait another two months for these denials to stop?
I don’t expect a reversal of all such denials over the last four years, but I think the least the QIOs could do would be to stop enforcing it now. Right now, the QIOs have the discretion to approve admissions with the complete absence of an admission order. It would seem reasonable that the QIOs can use this discretion to approve admissions for which the authentication is untimely.
Hospitals with pending denials that are awaiting their educational calls should discuss this with the QIO during the calls and ask them to read CMS’s words, use their discretion, and consider overturning the denials.
Program Note: Register to listen to Dr. Ronald Hirsch every Monday on Monitor Mondays at 10-10:30 a.m. ET.
EDITOR’S NOTE: The author of this article used artificial intelligence- (AI)-assisted tools in its composition, but all content, analysis, and conclusions were based on the
As the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) clarifies existing Medicare policies like the Two-Midnight Rule, which guides the appropriateness of inpatient services, some
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
