Master the upcoming ICD-10 code and IPPS changes! Prepare your team for the upcoming changes taking effect on October 1. Discover the benefits of IPPSPalooza and how it can drive your success. Click here >
Judge’s order prevented closing of mental health clinic.
Last week, I won a permanent injunction for a healthcare facility that, but for the injunction, would be closed, its 300 staff unemployed, and its 600 Medicare and Medicaid consumers without access to their mental health and substance abuse providers, their primary care physicians, and the Suboxone clinic.
The judge’s clerk emailed us on Friday. The email was terse, although the clerk signified that the message was important by clicking the little red exclamation point. It simply stated: “after speaking with Judge X, she is dismissing the government’s MTD and granting petitioner’s permanent injunction. Petitioner’s counsel can send a proposed decision within 10 days.” Such a simple email affected so many lives!
We often hear Ellen Fink-Samnick speak about the social determinants of health (SDoH) on RACmonitor. Well, this company is minority-owned, and most of its staff and consumers are minorities.
Why was this company on the brink of closing down? The managed care organization (MCO) terminated the company’s Medicaid contract. Medicaid comprised the majority of its revenue. The MCO’s reason was that the company violated 42 CFR §455.106, which states:
“Information that must be disclosed: before the Medicaid agency enters into or renews a provider agreement, or at any time upon written request by the Medicaid agency, the provider must disclose to the Medicaid agency the identity of any person who:
(1) Has ownership or control interest in the provider, or is an agent or managing employee of the provider; and
(2) Has been convicted of a criminal offense related to that person‘s involvement in any program under Medicare, Medicaid, or the title XX services program since the inception of those programs.”
The company’s former CEO – for years – had relied on professional tax accountants for his company’s taxes and his own personal taxes. His wife, who is a physician, relied on her husband to do their personal taxes as one of his “honey-do” tasks. The CEO relied on a sub-par accountant for a couple years, and pleaded guilty to failing to pay personal taxes for two years. The plea ended up in the newspaper, and the MCO terminated the contract.
We argued that the company, as an entity, was bigger than just the CEO. Quickly, we filed for a temporary restraining order (TRO) to keep the company open. Concurrently, we transitioned the company’s ownership from the CEO to his wife. She became CEO in a seamless transition. A long-time executive stepped up as HR management.
Yet, according to testimony, the MCO terminated the company’s contract when the local newspaper published the article about the CEO’s guilty plea. The article was published on April 9, and the termination notice was sent out April 19. It was a quick decision.
We argued that 42 CFR §455.106 didn’t apply, because the CEO’s guilty plea was:
The judge agreed. We won the TRO for immediate relief. After a four-day hearing and 22 witnesses, we won the preliminary injunction. At this point, the MCO hired outside counsel with our tax dollars, which I did bring up in the final hearing on the merits.
New outside counsel was very excited to be involved. He immediately propounded a ton of discovery, asking for things that he already had and for criminal documents that we had no access to – because, by law, the government has the right to possession of them, while defendants do not.
It grew more litigious as the final hearing on the merits approached.
Finally, we presented our case for a permanent injunction, emphasizing the importance of the company and the smooth transition to the new CEO. Because we won, the company remains open, and providing medically necessary services to our most needy populations.
Lastly, I get the opportunity to draft the proposed decision.
Programming Note: Listen to Knicole Emanuel’s live RAC Report every Monday on Monitor Mondays, 10 Eastern.
May is National Mental Health Awareness month, and slightly more than half of American adults are estimated to be suffering from some form of mental
Numerous updates from CMS include post-acute transfers to skilled nursing. In the last week there have been a lot of updates that have come from
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
The CMS Two-Midnight Rule and short-stay audits are here to stay, impacting inpatient and outpatient admissions, ASC procedures, and Medicare Parts C & D. New for 2024, the Two-Midnight Rule applies to Medicare Advantage patients, requiring differentiation between Medicare plans affecting Case Managers, Utilization Review, and operational processes and knowledge of a vital distinction between these patients that influences post-discharge medical reviews and compliance risk. Join Michael G. Calahan for a comprehensive webcast covering federal laws for all admission processes. Gain the knowledge needed to navigate audits effectively and optimize patient access points, personnel, and compliance strategies. Learn Two-Midnight Rule essentials, Medicare Advantage implications, and compliance best practices. Discover operational insights for short-stay admissions, outpatient observation, and the ever-changing Inpatient-Only Listing.
A massive task lies ahead! Now’s the time to start preparing your case management and utilization review teams for successful implementation of changes contained in the 2024 IPPS, OPPS and MPFS rules.
Gain clarity on billing, patient notifications, and discharge appeal rights in social admissions. Join our webcast for essential insights and strategies to navigate this complex landscape, ensuring financial stability and optimal patient care.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides tried-and-true strategies and insight into outpatient in hospital bed stays including determining the applicable definition, who uses it, and when and how to bill for this circumstance, solidified with concrete case examples and expert insight.
Explore comprehensive guidelines and best practices for secondary diagnosis coding in our illuminating webcast. Delve into the intricacies of accurately assigning secondary diagnosis codes to ensure precise medical documentation. Learn how to navigate complex scenarios and adhere to coding regulations while enhancing coding proficiency. Our expert-led webcast covers essential insights, including documentation requirements, sequencing strategies, and industry updates. Elevate your coding skills and stay current with the latest coding advancements so you can determine the correct DRG assignment to optimize reimbursement, support medical decision-making, and maintain compliance.
Enhance your inpatient coding precision and revenue with Principal Diagnosis Coding: Mastering Selection and Sequencing. Join our expert-led webcast to conquer the challenges of principal diagnosis selection and sequencing. We’ll decode the intricacies of ICD-10-CM guidelines, equipping you with a clear grasp of the rules and the official UHDDS principal diagnosis definition. Uncover the crucial role of coding conventions, master the sequencing of related conditions, and confidently tackle cases with equally valid principal diagnoses.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY24 Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) Final Rule, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, plus insights, analysis and answers to questions from the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
This third session in our 2024 IPPS Summit will feature a review of FY24 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by senior healthcare consultant Laurie Johnson, with bonus insights and analysis from two acclaimed subject matter experts
Copyright © 2023 ICD10monitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
