In this case, more than 50 percent of the practice’s patients refuse to provide an email address or do not have one to provide.
Recently, I’ve seen a slew of meaningful use audits. Hospitals go through these audits all the time. It usually goes like this: a hospital purchases an expensive electronic health record (EHR) system, and since they all will be sharing the EHR, the physicians sign over their meaningful use incentive to the hospital. The hospital submits the information and number of physicians using the program, and the hospital receives an incentive of approximately $8,500 per physician.
A recent Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) audit of a Georgia physician’s office ended up with a $34,000 alleged overpayment, based on four of nine physicians supposedly not meeting Objectives 8 and 9. This is a small case, only $34,000 and four doctors, but you can imagine how big meaningful use audits can be, if the entity is a large hospital.
Meaningful use requirements can be found at 42 C.F.R. § 495.2, et al. The purpose of the inventive program is to encourage Medicaid providers to “purchase, implement, and operate (including support services and training for staff) certified EHR technology.”
Today, we are talking specifically about Objective 8. Objective 8 requires the provider to “provide patients the ability to view online, download, and transmit their health information within four business days of the information being available to the eligible provider.” 42 C.F.R. § 495.22. There are two measures within Objective 8:
Measure 1: More than 50 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period are provided timely access to view online, download, and transmit to a third party their health information, subject to the EP’s discretion to withhold certain information.
Measure 2: In 2017 and 2018, more than 5 percent of unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period (or their authorized representatives) views, downloads, or transmits their health information to a third party during the EHR reporting period.
In this case, the RAC auditor claimed that we did not meet the criteria of Objective 8, Measures 1 and 2. No justification or support for this position was provided. We disagreed.
The client has an EHR system that allows for all patients who provide an email address to access, view, download and transmit health information. More than 50 percent of the practice’s patients refuse to provide an email address or do not have one to provide. Despite the auditor being aware of this issue, they continued to give the practice the runaround with numbers and calculations. The RAC auditor ignored explanations from Dr. Miniyar and MacPractice – almost as if they had their mind made up to recoup these funds.
We are appealing, and are confident that we will not have to pay back any money.
Programming Note: Listen to Knicole Emanuel’s live reports every Monday on Monitor Mondays, 10 a.m. Eastern.
For most of modern healthcare, the medical record was passive. It waited.It stored information. It was interpreted later by coders, clinicaldocumentation integrity (CDI) professionals, auditors,
One of my favorite resources is Insights, distributed by Kodiak. Let me begin by noting that I do not have any affiliation with Kodiak. I
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
