Payment Policies, New Codes, and Rising Costs: Preparing for Radiology’s 2026 Storm of Challenges with Subject Matter Expert Laura Manser

A storm of coding and compliance changes will sweep through interventional radiology and radiology, creating challenges for coding and compliance professionals alike. Reimbursement is especially at risk with the new lower extremity revascularization code set taking effect at the start of the new year. With so many factors at stake in 2026, expert guidance is imperative to navigate the surging tides of change. Nationally renowned radiology, interventional radiology, and nuclear medicine subject matter expert Laura Manser, CPC, CPCO, CDEO, CPMA, CEMC, CIRCC, RCC, delivers professional insight into the changes that will transform the new year in part one of our exclusive interview series. With an expert spotlight on these challenges, professionals won’t be left in the dark and can better prepare for any problems that may surface.

Question:

For 2026, why is the conversion factor considered a deceptive increase in terms of overall payment boost? What should people know about the conversion factor and other payment policies?

Answer:

“The 2026 conversion factor looks like good news at first glance. Yes, we’re seeing the first increase in six years, with the rate going up to $33.5675 for APM participants and $33.4009 for non-participants. But that headline number doesn’t tell the real story.

The problem is that any upward movement in the conversion factor gets quickly offset by other CMS adjustments happening at the same time. The big one is the 2.5% efficiency adjustment that CMS finalized. They’re reducing work RVUs across the board for non-time-based codes, which includes most radiology services. CMS’s own estimates show diagnostic radiology taking a 2% hit overall, nuclear medicine down 1%, and radiation oncology down 1%. Only interventional radiology sees a positive 2% impact.

Then there’s the site-of-service payment differential. CMS reduced indirect practice expense RVUs by 50% for services performed in hospital settings. Diagnostic radiology got an exemption, but interventional radiology did not, which will significantly impact those practices.

Beyond these specific changes, you’ve got the usual suspects: budget neutrality rules, valuation shifts, and efficiency assumptions that redistribute dollars across specialties. In radiology, those redistributions tend to work against us.

When you add it all up, that conversion factor increase is essentially being clawed back through these other mechanisms. A 1% increase can easily be neutralized or even reversed once all the underlying adjustments are applied. This is why practices need to stop chasing the headline number and start reading between the lines. The conversion factor is just one component of the process, not a solution.

Financial clarity comes from doing a code-level analysis to understand your specific impact, rather than celebrating a number that doesn’t translate into actual increased payments. What matters is how relative value changes and payment policies interact in your particular practice setting.”

Question:

The ~2.5% efficiency cut will lower work Relative Value Units (wRVUs) for many services. How would you explain the impact of this change to stakeholders concerned about reimbursement?

Answer:

“This is really frustrating because CMS’s reasoning is fundamentally flawed when it comes to radiology. Their argument is that services become more efficient over time due to technology and improved workflows, so they should be paid less. But the opposite is actually true in our field.

Take CT scans as a perfect example. Twenty years ago, a CT study might have 40 images. Today, that same study routinely has 400 or more images—ten times the data a radiologist needs to review and interpret. How is that more efficient?

And then there’s AI. CMS assumes technology makes us faster, but right now AI tools are flagging additional findings that require more physician review, correlation with other studies, and documentation. It’s adding complexity, not reducing it. The reality in radiology and IR is that most groups have already optimized every inch of their process. There’s not much efficiency left to gain.

The practical impact is about a 1% overall reduction in reimbursement when you factor everything together. That might not sound like much, but in an environment where practice expenses keep rising, workforce shortages are real, and we’re already operating on thin margins, every percentage point matters.

For physicians, this feels personal because it touches compensation, productivity, and perception of workload. When talking to them about this, it’s important to remind them that wRVUs are a measurement tool, not an overall verdict on value. The key is to run side-by-side comparisons of your top codes under the 2025 and 2026 models to quantify the impact and plan ahead. Then, have the compensation conversation early. Waiting until Q1 to feel it in paychecks creates frustration. Data gives everyone a shared starting point.

The really concerning part is that CMS plans to apply this efficiency adjustment every three years going forward. The Radiology Business Management Association (RBMA) is gathering data to show CMS the reality of increased complexity in radiology, and we’re going to need practices to help document this with real-world examples and metrics. Without pushback supported by hard data, this will continue to erode reimbursement year after year.”

Question:

How should professionals best prepare for the changes?

Answer:

“Regarding the efficiency adjustment, practices need to start collecting real-world data now to counter CMS’s flawed assumptions. Document actual interpretation times, track image volumes per study, and measure how AI tools are adding to workflow rather than reducing it. RBMA will be gathering this data to present to CMS, and member participation will be critical to building a case for reversing this policy before the next three-year cycle.

On the practice expense issue, be prepared to provide detailed cost information if RBMA or other organizations request it. Share your actual indirect cost data, demonstrate how current reimbursement falls short, and help build the evidence base showing that radiology’s costs have changed dramatically since 2006. The only way to fix this long-standing problem is with concrete data from actual practices showing what it really costs to deliver radiology services today.”

Biography
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Laura Manser, CPC, CPCO, CDEO, CEMC, CPMA, CIRCC, RCC

Laura Manser is a nationally recognized expert in radiology, interventional radiology, and nuclear medicine. A published author and frequent national speaker, Laura brings 25 years of experience in coding, auditing, compliance, and documentation improvement. She is known for delivering clear, practical education that helps coders navigate complex guidelines, boost accuracy, and stay current with evolving industry standards.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering OB GYN Coding Accuracy: Precision Coding for Compliance and Reimbursement

Gain clarity and confidence in OB‑GYN coding with this expert‑led webcast featuring Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS‑P, CPEDC, COPC. You’ll learn how to apply global maternity package rules accurately, select the right CPT codes for procedures and visits, and identify documentation gaps that lead to denials. With practical guidance and real examples, this session helps you strengthen compliance, reduce audit risk, and ensure accurate reimbursement for women’s health services.

May 14, 2026

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update Webcast Series

Uncover essential coding insights with nationally recognized coding authority Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS. Through ICD10monitor’s interactive, on‑demand webcast series, Kay walks you through the AHA’s 2026 ICD‑10‑CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics, translating each update into practical, easy‑to‑apply guidance designed to sharpen precision, ensure compliance, and strengthen day‑to‑day decision‑making. Available shortly after each official release.

April 13, 2026

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update: Fourth Quarter

Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.

December 14, 2026

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update: Third Quarter

Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s third quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.

October 12, 2026

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Compliance for the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility (IPF-PPS): Minimizing Federal Audit Findings by Strengthening Best Practices

Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.

April 9, 2026

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips

Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.

March 19, 2026

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

Trending News

BLOOM INTO SAVINGS! Get 25% OFF during our spring sale through March 27. Use code SPRING26 at checkout to claim this offer.

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24