Is this a familiar scenario to you? Patients come to the ED, although some do not even need an ED level of care. Some do, and can later be discharged. Some need to stay.
Today I want to focus on those who stay and require more care than they can obtain at their home or at the physician office. That care could still be outpatient, in the form of observation (because we just aren’t sure yet what the major issue is), or it could be inpatient. Our physicians make that call.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) rules are very clear in that it requires a physician determination, based on consideration of complex medical factors documented in the medical record.
Say one patient is admitted to inpatient, and then the dance begins with obtaining authorization: patient access verifies that their insurance is active and sends a Notice of Admission (NOA). Utilization management (UM) then follows the contract for the insurance company to run a screening tool and send communication to the insurance company on reason need and a screening tool. And if there is any possibility of a readmission, there is more work to be done on both sides.
Have we stopped to think about the work we are doing? Do any of you want to take a timeout and think about what we need to accomplish here?
During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, many insurance companies took their lead from CMS, and since the public health emergency (PHE) allowed us to waive some UM processes, the insurance companies helped by waiving prior authorization. I am here to tell you that that process was a much-needed reprieve, and I thank every insurance company that made it possible.
I am not sure what the statistics showed as we emerged from the worst of the pandemic, but it certainly seems that the insurance companies must have thought that the hospitals were pulling a fast one during that time, because it is far more difficult now (since about late 2021 to early 2022) to obtain the authorization number we need to bill for an inpatient level of care.
And over the course of the past few years, we have really lost that human touch to some degree. I agree that portals and faxing communication is more efficient. And I know many payors would just really like access to the electronic medical record (EMR). But there are times when there is a lot of valuable information that is lost in the translation of the written word, and all too often the conversation (and medical decision-making) is not considered, because it isn’t happening. Convenient, yes, for very black-and-white cases, but those gray cases are the norm, not the exception, and so how do we do things differently?
I wonder, and I challenge all of us to consider whether it is time to change our way of doing business. Should we start meeting over virtual platforms with the insurance companies? For all the insurance contracts you hold, could you review the criteria for the Joint Operating Committee (JOC) and include the clinical teams to discuss trends you are seeing? Is it time to meet virtually with patients at the bedside, when they have a high likelihood for (or even were recently) a readmission?
How many times do we need to walk in the shoes of another? The hospital is doing its job, providing care for those who come to seek care. The insurance company is doing its job, providing screening and evaluation of the documentation in the chart to determine how to reimburse the hospital. But where does the patient fit in all of this? What say do they have? How can they become more active in their overall care (both physical and financial), in order to achieve the best outcomes?
I wonder how many hospitals call and talk on a weekly basis with their high-volume insurance companies. I mean, really talk – not just about the most recent case that they denied, but about their goals and outcomes. Partnering to create a better process on what is needed and how to get that in order to pay the hospitals (and physicians) for what they do is vital. And teach us about some of your programs that are available to your members that might keep them out of the ED and out of the hospital altogether!
The future really depends on us learning to work together.
Not having enough qualified health information management (HIM) staff is a significant global challenge that severely impacts healthcare systems. This shortage of HIM professionals leads
I recently decided to test ChatGPT to see if it would write a note that could be pasted into a medical record. I submitted the
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Unlock the keys to bridging the clinical-finance disconnect by transforming your approach to revenue cycle collaboration for superior patient care and financial prosperity!
Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he delves into the pivotal connection between case management, utilization review, and hospital revenue cycles, unveiling strategies to enhance communication and align goals effectively. Discover how to overcome hidden challenges hindering seamless collaboration and gain insights imperative for success
During this webcast Dr. Hirsch will breakdown the CMS-4201-F rule and the new federal regulations, how and when they will apply to Medicare Advantages plans.
The CMS Two-Midnight Rule and short-stay audits are here to stay, impacting inpatient and outpatient admissions, ASC procedures, and Medicare Parts C & D. New for 2024, the Two-Midnight Rule applies to Medicare Advantage patients, requiring differentiation between Medicare plans affecting Case Managers, Utilization Review, and operational processes and knowledge of a vital distinction between these patients that influences post-discharge medical reviews and compliance risk. Join Michael G. Calahan for a comprehensive webcast covering federal laws for all admission processes. Gain the knowledge needed to navigate audits effectively and optimize patient access points, personnel, and compliance strategies. Learn Two-Midnight Rule essentials, Medicare Advantage implications, and compliance best practices. Discover operational insights for short-stay admissions, outpatient observation, and the ever-changing Inpatient-Only Listing.
A massive task lies ahead! Now’s the time to start preparing your case management and utilization review teams for successful implementation of changes contained in the 2024 IPPS, OPPS and MPFS rules.
Uncover effective techniques to foster provider understanding of CDI, empower CDISs and coders to customize their queries for enhanced effectiveness, and learn to engage adult learners, leveraging their experiences for superior learning outcomes. Elevate your CDI expertise, leading to fewer coding errors, reduced claim denials, and minimized audit issues.
This exclusive ICD10monitor webcast series will help you acquire the critical knowledge you need to completely and accurately assign ICD-10-PCS and CPT® codes for spinal fusion and other common spinal procedures.
This exclusive ICD10monitor webcast is intended to elevate and streamline outpatient coding for spinal procedures. Our expert presenter, Kim Felix, RHIA, CCS., will provide clear, detailed explanations covering spinal anatomy, spinal procedures, and correct CPT coding practices.
During this exclusive ICD10monitor webcast, inpatient coders will gain a profound understanding of prevalent spinal procedures. They’ll delve into the intricate anatomy, grasp the purpose and method behind these procedures, uncover essential elements within physician documentation, and receive expert guidance, step by step, on constructing accurate ICD-10-PCS codes. It’s the key to enhancing their expertise and ensuring coding precision.
Copyright © 2023 ICD10monitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
