OIG Faults MAOs for Inappropriate Denials

OIG report: widespread and persistent problems related to inappropriate denials of services and payment by Medicare Advantage Organizations.

Organizations continue to find the management of denials an Achille’s heel within the revenue cycle.  Insufficient documentation, system flaws, and errors related to human intervention are common reasons for generating a claim denial. 

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG’s) involvement with Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAO) brings heightened awareness and anticipated improvement for the claim payment process and ultimately the patient experience. 

The Medicare Fee for Service (FFS) program provides coverage for an array of healthcare services. MAO should provide the same coverage as traditional Medicare but with the added benefit of coordinating care for beneficiaries.  As with many managed care plans, the coordination of care is thought to improve efficiencies and quality of care while managing cost.  MAOs may require specific stipulations in addition to traditional Medicare coverage requirements, for example, pre-authorizations, physician referral, and required use of in network physicians for specialty services. Capitated payment models, to include Medicare Advantage, raise an overarching concern of payers denying access to service and/or payment to improve profits.

The OIG conducts annual random reviews of MAO denied claims.  In 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) cited more than half of the claims MAO denied for preauthorization or payment were inaccurate. In 2018 CMS revealed 75 percent of initial MAO denials were overturned. This year, the OIG reviewed claims data from 15 of the largest MAO, totaling 500 claims from June 1 through 9, 2019. Using a random sample, expert coders and/or physician reviewers examined the reliability of 250 prior authorization request denials and 250 payment denials.

The objectives of the review were clear; determine the extent to which selected MAOs denied prior authorization requests that met traditional Medicare coverage rules, uncover the why behind these denials, identify healthcare services meeting Medicare and MAO coverage and billing requirements which continue to result in denials.  Thirteen percent of preauthorization denials were related to claims meeting Medicare coverage but denied by the MAO due to their clinical criteria, not included in Medicare coverage.  Nevertheless, after physician review the services conducted were considered medically necessary.   Denials also included in the thirteen percent denial rate relate to insufficient documentation to support a billed service.  CMS reviewers were able to locate the documentation in the medical record.   

Eighteen percent of payment denials relate to human error during a manual claim review or system flaws due to incorrect or outdated programming. System errors are of grave concern as initial denials are autogenerated, which can create a larger volume of inaccurate denials. These denials increase the burden on organizations to discover the root cause and appeal many claims.

High-cost imaging, post-acute nursing facilities, and acute inpatient rehabilitation were among the front runners of services initially denied. MAOs often deny expensive services and offer an alternative option in an effort to contain cost.  Pain management injections were also noted to trigger a high volume of denials due to the increased amount of fraud and abuse related to pain management; therefore, these services are under the watchful eye of MAO reviewers.  

The OIG recommends MAOs to assess the use of clinical criteria, re-evaluate the root cause of the volume of denials regarding insufficient documentation when the documentation is present, and assess system vulnerabilities for incorrect algorithms or updates, both of which require manual intervention in order to submit an appeal. CMS agreed with all of the OIG’s recommendations.

Thwarting denials are a costly administrative burden that directly affects the patient experience during or following direct care.  Unsubstantiated Medical Necessity denials may prevent patient access to necessary services unless they agree to pay out of pocket. 

Among the 15 MAOs included in the sample, United Healthcare Group, Humana, CVS Health Corporation, Kaiser Health Foundation Plan, and Anthem are the top five in terms of enrolled beneficiaries and/or covering the highest number of states or territories.  Medicare Advantage had 26.2 billion beneficiaries in 2021 with a projected 51 percent increase in participants by 2030.  Nine percent of the claims included in the OIGs review were initially denied by Medicare Advantage, later to be overturned within three months of an appeal.  Healthcare organizations are buried in their attempt to implement a denial management plan without relief in sight.

Hopefully, the OIG findings will prompt productive discussions between payers and providers, whereas forward motion in this arena historically has been nonexistent.    

Programming Note: Listen to Susan Gatehouse live today during Talk Ten Tuesdays when she cohosts the broadcast with Chuck Buck at 10 Eastern.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Susan Gatehouse, RHIT, CCS,CPC, AHIMA-Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer

Susan Gatehouse is the founder and chief executive officer of Axea Solutions. An industry expert in revenue cycle management, Gatehouse established Axea Solutions in 1998, and currently partners with healthcare organizations across the nation, to craft solutions for unique challenges in the dynamic world of healthcare reimbursement and data management.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Sepsis Sequencing in Focus: From Documentation to Defensible Coding

Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.

March 26, 2026
I022426_SQUARE

Fracture Care Coding: Reduce Denials Through Accurate Coding, Sequencing, and Modifier Use

Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.

February 24, 2026
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Compliance for the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility (IPF-PPS): Minimizing Federal Audit Findings by Strengthening Best Practices

Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.

April 9, 2026

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips

Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.

March 19, 2026

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24