The diagnosis of obesity is a risk factor for coronavirus.
Recently, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated information regarding the risk factors for COVID-19. Included in their high-risk groups are those with the following:
There has been discussion on many of the risk factors, as well as data showing deaths in the risk groups, such as deaths in the nursing home population. One interesting risk factor is severe obesity.
Obesity is defined as an excessive amount of body fat. Obesity increases a patient’s risk for heart disease, hypertension, and some specific cancers. Obesity is measured by body mass index (BMI). Body mass index is the weight in kilograms, divided by the square of height in meters for adults (age 20 and older). BMI is an indicator of body fat, not necessarily the health of the patient. The categories of obesity are:
BMI is measured differently for children. For pediatric patients, the measurement is based on age, gender, and percentiles.
The coding for weight diagnoses can be found in various chapters of ICD-10-CM. Being underweight is coded as R63.6, which is in Chapter 18 (Signs, Symptoms, and Abnormal Clinical and Laboratory Findings, Not Elsewhere Classified). The code for obesity is found in Chapter 4 (Endocrine, Metabolic, and Nutritional Diseases). The code for morbid obesity is E66.01, which is also in Chapter 4. BMI can be used to define the extent of obesity. BMI can be found in Chapter 21 (Factors Influencing Health Status and Contact with Health Services) and Category Z68. Adult BMI is reported with codes Z68.0 – Z68.45. Pediatric BMI is reported with codes Z68.51-Z68.54. There is an instructional note with Category Z68 that the adult BMI applies to patients age 20 and older. Pediatric BMI is reported based on growth charts from the CDC and applies to ages 2-19. These BMIs are reported based on percentiles.
In addition to the coding guidance included in ICD-10-CM, there is additional guidance found in the Official Coding and Reporting Guidelines for ICD-10-CM. In Section I.B.14, there is guidance regarding BMI that can be documented by other clinicians than the patient’s provider. In Section I.C.21.c3, the coder is advised that BMI may not be coded without a reportable diagnosis, such as obesity. BMI should not be reported for pregnant patients.
As you develop facility-specific guidelines, it is important to identify where BMI documentation can be located, and which documentation is the “source of truth.” BMIs can change during the patient’s visit, so the coder should be consistent in reporting BMI. Note that the Official Coding and Reporting Guidelines state that BMI should not be reported unless there is a reportable diagnosis. Did the provider address the patient’s weight? Does the diagnosis meet the definition of a reportable diagnosis? BMI of 19.9 or less and 40 and greater is considered a complication/comorbid condition in the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) methodology. Payers are questioning the reporting of BMI when weight is not addressed during the patient’s stay.
The diagnosis of obesity is a risk factor for coronavirus, but also a focus for payer review of claims. Ensure that weight and BMI are reported accurately.
Programming Note: Laurie Johnson is a permanent panelist on Talk Ten Tuesdays. Listen her Coding Report live every Tuesday, 10-10:30 a.m. EST.
I receive a lot of newsletters every morning to help me stay abreast of what is happening in the healthcare industry. A troubling recent trend
EDITOR’S NOTE Day 3 of the federal shutdown continues. This article by Mark Spivey is part of a special section today published by RACmonitor and
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
