The Good Faith Estimate appears to be troublesome.
Let’s dive back into our old friend, the No Surprises Act, and talk about a little-known requirement in the Act that applies to ALL providers. The provision is called the Good Faith Estimate, and it is sure to provide difficulties for physicians and hospitals on its compliance date of Jan. 1, 2022.
In the most recent No Surprises Act regulations published at the beginning of October, the government requires that all providers – in-network, out-of-network, in hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), private practices, all providers – provide a good-faith estimate of any possible costs associated with any and all scheduled healthcare services to uninsured and self-paying customers.
Let me say that again: on Jan. 1, 2022, every time a healthcare service is scheduled for an uninsured or self-pay patient, providers must give the patient an estimate of the total costs of the service.
A number of things to point out here:
First is the broad scope of the requirement. While this Good Faith Estimate is only required for patients who are uninsured or self-paying, the requirement applies to all providers for all healthcare items and services, from annual checkups to the most complex of planned procedures; the regulations also imply that this includes dental, vision, and behavioral health.
Second, the requirement mandates very quick turnaround times. If the patient schedules the service further out than two weeks, the provider has three days to provide this estimate. If the patient schedules the service within two weeks of the appointment, then the provider has one day to provide the estimate.
In some cases, this may be somewhat simple, generating an estimate for what the government has called “shoppable” services, wherein the general price of a healthcare item or procedure might be easily estimated. But things get more difficult, of course, for any procedure that is even slightly complicated, and it will certainly be difficult for procedures that involve multiple physicians working for different business entities.
The regulation gives specific requirements to what it calls a “convening provider or facility:” this is the entity that schedules the procedure and is ultimately responsible for delivering the estimate.
The regulation also calls out “co-providers or co-facilities,” that would include any other providers or facilities that may be involved in the procedure. Those co-providers or co-facilities are responsible for getting their own estimates for their parts of the procedure to the convening provider, so that the convening provider can pull all of the estimates together and give the uninsured or self-pay patient a single estimate.
That estimate needs to also include the costs of any possible healthcare items or services that may be required before or after the scheduled service.
You see the difficulty.
Fortunately, the No Surprises Act regulation also included an enforcement discretion period for this good-faith estimate requirement, until December of next year. However, it appears that this discretion may only apply to the co-providers and co-facilities supplying their estimates, and that the so-called convening provider will still be expected to give some kind of estimate to self-pay and uninsured patients starting this coming Jan. 1.
The good-faith estimate requirement is just the first stage in a broader No Surprises Act provision that will require providers to send good-faith estimates for insured patients – patients with commercial insurance – to the patient’s health plans. The government has postponed that broader requirement until further rule-making.
What’s surprising is the fact that this requirement is getting so little notice in the industry press. We know that the standard development organization HL7 is thinking through how to facilitate communications between convening and co-providers and facilities, but otherwise it feels like crickets out there.
Programming Note: Listen to Matthew Albright and the Monitor Mondays Legislative Update, sponsored by Zelis, Mondays at 10 Eastern.
Clinical documentation integrity (CDI) professionals work in a variety of settings, and although I mostly focus on topics related to hospital inpatient billing, this week
With so much focus within the federal government on abuse, fraud, and waste, I thought it might be helpful to review a couple of federal
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
