The No Surprises Act’s Independent Dispute Resolution process – deemed clunky by some – appears to be swamping the HHS system.
The No Surprises Act arbitrators are swamped, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra told senators last week. “We are receiving 10 times the number of claims that anyone ever expected,” he said.
The Secretary was speaking at a hearing about the Independent Dispute Resolution process, or IDR, which the agency created as required by the No Surprises Act. While the Act protects patients from balance billing, that still leaves the question of how much health plans should pay providers for those out-of-network services.
Enter the IDR process, whereby third-party arbitrators decide a provider’s reimbursement by considering a number of factors outlined in the original Act and in subsequent regulations and guidance.
But the IDR process is completely overwhelmed, Becerra and other officials told lawmakers. A recent survey found that over 90 percent of emergency department claims initiated in the IDR process remain open.
The process is not quite a year old yet, so how did this train wreck happen?
Three reasons:
First, HHS underestimated how much the IDR would be used by providers to argue for reimbursement.
In the original rule, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) suggested that a little more than 17,000 claims would go to IDR in the course of a year. Last week, the trade journal Health Affairs estimated that 700,000 IDR claims have been initiated.
So, they were only off by about 683,000.
Now, numbers seem to indicate that at least half of the claims submitted aren’t actually eligible to be arbitrated. The problem is that there is no good way to weed those ineligible claims out early in the process.
Which brings us to the second problem: the processes put in place to manage the IDR. For example, the government IDR portal, meant to facilitate communication between all parties, got a late start, not launching until April of last year, and it has been at best, clunky. New features to the portal are added every month, but the IDR is still a very manual process, and difficult for all parties to use, including the beleaguered third-party arbitrators.
Finally, CMS has been required to continually change its IDR policies, particularly regarding the methodology the arbitrators should use to make their determinations, because of a series of lawsuit decisions emerging from the U.S. Federal Court in Texas.
In 30 seconds, here’s the rough-and-tumble life and times of the NSA’s IDR policy:
In the words of one senator last week, “it’s a big mess.”
I often begin my day with an environmental scan. Last week, an article from Becker’s Clinical Leadership caught my eye, “Hospital mortality, infectionrates improve despite
In my travels to hospitals across the country and time spent in emergency rooms shadowing the critical work of social workers, I’ve seen firsthand the
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
