Pending a possible government shut down, this bill would allow documentation from a home health agency to be considered when records are reviewed.
Late on Feb. 5, the U.S. House of Representatives introduced a “bipartisan” bill to avoid another government shutdown. While the big healthcare news of this bill was the elimination of the dreaded therapy cap, there were also many other notable provisions, including some that may be of interest to the home health-related RACmonitor audience.
First, as we all know, there has been a large number of home healthcare denials related to lack of documentation by physicians of the need for home care services and the lack of proper documentation of homebound status. Section 2202 of the aforementioned bill will allow documentation from a home health agency to be considered when records are reviewed. The bill states that “for the purposes of documentation for physician certification and recertification made under paragraph (2) on or after Jan. 1, 2019, and made with respect to home health services furnished by a home health agency, in addition to using documentation in the medical record of the physician who so certifies or the medical record of the acute or post-acute care facility (in the case that home health services were furnished to an individual who was directly admitted to the home health agency from such a facility), the Secretary may use documentation in the medical record of the home health agency as supporting material, as appropriate to the case involved.’’
If many auditors accept this addition to the regulation, it will relieve a large burden on physicians who now must follow complex rules and documentation requirements to ensure that each patient’s homebound status is documented to the satisfaction of even the pickiest auditor.
The next section, 2203, establishes a settlement process for pending home health denials. As described, this process will be very similar to the settlement process used by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in 2014 for the thousands of hospital denials that were awaiting hearings at the administrative law judge (ALJ) level. It will be an all-or-nothing process, and although there is no set payment rate, the bill does note that “in selecting such percentage, the Secretary shall consider the percentage used under the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services hospital appeals settlement that began on Aug. 29, 2014.”
You may recall that the first settlement was set at 68 percent of the net allowable amount, so one can presume that CMS will use a similar value this time. While the number of claims for home health is likely significantly fewer than hospital claims, home health agencies are also smaller and less able to withstand the loss of revenue. That may make this settlement offer, once finalized, quite appealing.
Of course, this bill has several steps to approval, but I am sure that those in the therapy and home health worlds are hoping for passage.
Denials have been on my mind for the last few weeks – specifically, how do we prevent them? According to the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS),
On April 2, my 92-year-old father sustained a fall in his assisted living facility (ALF), which resulted in an emergency department evaluation. Fortunately, he hadn’t
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides tried-and-true strategies and insight into outpatient in hospital bed stays including determining the applicable definition, who uses it, and when and how to bill for this circumstance, solidified with concrete case examples and expert insight.
Practical solutions for CDM departments to protect your hospital’s revenue.
This webcast teaches hospitals how to comply with CMS price transparency rules and compare their rates with peer hospitals. It covers creating a compliant machine-readable file, comparing negotiated rates, and improving pricing decisions.
The No Surprises Act (NSA) presents a challenge for hospitals and providers who must provide Good Faith Estimates (GFEs) for all schedulable services for self-pay and uninsured patients. Compliance is necessary, but few hospitals have been able to fully comply with the requirements despite being a year into the NSA. This webcast provides an overview of the NSA/GFE policy, its impact, and a step-by-step process to adhere to the requirements and avoid non-compliance penalties.
This expert-guided webcast will showcase tips for providers to ensure appropriate capture of the work performed for a visit. Comprehensive examples will be given that demonstrate documentation gaps and how to educate providers on the documentation necessary to appropriately assign a level of service. You will gain clarification on answers regarding emergency department and urgent care coding circumstances as well as a review of how/when it is appropriate to code for E&M in radiology and more.
Set yourself up for financial and compliance success with expert guidance that breaks down the impactful changes including MS-DRG methodology, surgical hierarchy updates, and many new technology add-on payments (NTAPs). Identify areas of potential challenge ahead of time and master solutions for all 2024 Proposed IPPS changes.
Do you struggle with selecting and appending the correct modifier for your medical claims? Join our must-attend webinar, “Mastering Modifier Usage: Preventing Denials and Ensuring Compliance” to reduce claim denials and improve your reimbursement rates.
Kay Piper reviews the guidance and updates coders and CDISs on important information in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2023 ICD-10-CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Copyright © 2023 ICD10monitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
