Two payers allegedly inflated their bids.
Earlier this month, two Independence Blue Cross (IBC) subsidiaries in Pennsylvania agreed to pay $2.25 million to resolve allegations that they defrauded the Medicare Advantage (MA) program and violated the False Claims Act by improperly inflating their bids.
Medicare Advantage, also known as Medicare Part C, is a popular alternative to traditional Medicare where beneficiaries’ healthcare is managed by a private insurer instead of the government. In turn, the government pays that private insurer premiums on behalf of Medicare beneficiaries. Premiums are determined via a method called risk adjustment, where each plan member receives a risk score, a sum of coefficients that indicate either demography (i.e. sex and age) or health status, and certain medical conditions have assigned coefficient values.
For example, the demographic factor for an 82-year-old woman living in the community (i.e. not in assisted living) is .528, if that member also has been diagnosed with diabetes and morbid obesity, coefficients of .105 and .25 would be added to her risk score, resulting in a total risk score of .883. Risk scores are normalized so that an average beneficiary has a score of 1.0.
That risk score is then multiplied by a plan’s bid to the Medicare program to determine annual premium paid by Medicare. In the previous example, if a plan bid that insuring an average beneficiary would cost it $10,000 per year, insuring that aforementioned beneficiary would yield an annual premium of $8,830 (.883×10,000).
As an essential component of billions of dollars of government spending, Medicare Advantage bids are highly regulated. Violating those regulations is what IBC is accused of. An essential component of Medicare bids are estimated future costs, and how to estimate costs is dictated, in detail, by CMS, the agency overseeing Medicare. According to a whistleblower, IBC improperly inflated estimated costs, leading to improperly inflated bids, which then caused The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to pay premiums that were too high.
The whistleblower brought this lawsuit under the False Claims Act, a law that allows private persons to sue in the name of the government, alleging that the government has been defrauded, and share in up to 30 percent of any recovery. Here, the whistleblower will receive roughly $500,000.
This case is the latest in a recent pattern of government enforcement surrounding the Medicare Advantage program, an area that the Department of Justice has indicated is a priority. But most fraud allegations have focused on insurers exaggerating the diseases state of their members, making their populations appear sicker, and hence boosting premiums. Industry giants Anthem and UnitedHealth are currently fighting such allegations. This settlement is different, and relatively unique, because it focuses on bids, an area that has not yet been explored in fraud cases.
On April 2, my 92-year-old father sustained a fall in his assisted living facility (ALF), which resulted in an emergency department evaluation. Fortunately, he hadn’t
Did you know that approximately 70 percent of medical decisions are being made based on laboratory test results? Considering that colorectal cancer is one of
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides tried-and-true strategies and insight into outpatient in hospital bed stays including determining the applicable definition, who uses it, and when and how to bill for this circumstance, solidified with concrete case examples and expert insight.
Practical solutions for CDM departments to protect your hospital’s revenue.
This webcast teaches hospitals how to comply with CMS price transparency rules and compare their rates with peer hospitals. It covers creating a compliant machine-readable file, comparing negotiated rates, and improving pricing decisions.
The No Surprises Act (NSA) presents a challenge for hospitals and providers who must provide Good Faith Estimates (GFEs) for all schedulable services for self-pay and uninsured patients. Compliance is necessary, but few hospitals have been able to fully comply with the requirements despite being a year into the NSA. This webcast provides an overview of the NSA/GFE policy, its impact, and a step-by-step process to adhere to the requirements and avoid non-compliance penalties.
This expert-guided webcast will showcase tips for providers to ensure appropriate capture of the work performed for a visit. Comprehensive examples will be given that demonstrate documentation gaps and how to educate providers on the documentation necessary to appropriately assign a level of service. You will gain clarification on answers regarding emergency department and urgent care coding circumstances as well as a review of how/when it is appropriate to code for E&M in radiology and more.
Set yourself up for financial and compliance success with expert guidance that breaks down the impactful changes including MS-DRG methodology, surgical hierarchy updates, and many new technology add-on payments (NTAPs). Identify areas of potential challenge ahead of time and master solutions for all 2024 Proposed IPPS changes.
Do you struggle with selecting and appending the correct modifier for your medical claims? Join our must-attend webinar, “Mastering Modifier Usage: Preventing Denials and Ensuring Compliance” to reduce claim denials and improve your reimbursement rates.
Kay Piper reviews the guidance and updates coders and CDISs on important information in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2023 ICD-10-CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Copyright © 2023 ICD10monitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
