Navigating Reclassification from Inpatient to Outpatient Observation

Navigating Reclassification from Inpatient to Outpatient Observation

You have heard Dr. Ronald Hirsch, and I present on CMS-4204-F which introduces a process for expedited determinations for traditional Medicare beneficiaries who are reclassified from inpatient to outpatient observation services.

This process does not apply to Medicare Advantage enrollees and this process does not apply to patients who do not receive observation services after conversion from inpatient to outpatient.

On Dec. 5, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) provided additional guidance with the expectation that the Medicare Change of Status Notice (MCSN) that hospitals must start to provide this notice to qualifying individuals no later than Feb. 14, 2025.

Here’s an overview of what information we have thus far. 

The expedited determination process is codified at 42 CFR Part 405.1210 through 405.1212. It applies to Original Medicare beneficiaries formally admitted as inpatients but later reclassified to outpatient observation while still hospitalized.

Eligibility criteria differ based on Part B enrollment:

  • With Part B: A minimum three-day hospital stay is required with less than 3 days of inpatient status. The admission is considered day one, but the discharge day is not (like the SNF 3-day rule).
  • Without Part B: No stay requirement applies. Thus, notice is given as soon as the status is changed from inpatient to outpatient with observation services.

This process is relevant for all inpatient-level facilities, including Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs). Beneficiaries may act through representatives as needed.

Hospitals must document delivery of the MCSN form with a signature, offer paper copies upon request, and ensure the MCSN is provided within specific timeframes:

  • With Part B: Deliver after reclassification and by the third hospital day.
  • Without Part B: Deliver immediately after reclassification.
  • All cases: Delivery must occur at least four hours before discharge.

The MCSN must remain two pages, but hospitals can add logos and contact details. Beneficiary-specific notes can be included in the “Additional Information” section. Beneficiaries who refuse to sign still retain expedited determination rights. Hospitals should document the refusal with the date.

Hospitals must use interpreters, translators, and assistive devices to ensure comprehension, adhering to the Affordable Care Act and Civil Rights Act requirements. Hospitals must retain signed MCSNs in the medical record, with electronic storage permitted. The notice must be given similar to the guidelines for the Important Message from Medicare (IMM), no later than the 4-hour discharge window, however the patient does not have to stay for the four hours if they have no intention of appealing.

Beneficiaries and hospitals share responsibilities during the expedited determination process.

Beneficiary Responsibilities:
  • Timely Requests: Must be made before leaving the hospital.
  • Untimely Requests: Allowed post-discharge or even after claim submission.
  • Provide Information: Respond promptly to BFCC-QIO requests and submit relevant details.
Hospital Responsibilities:
  • Submit the MCSN and additional documentation to the BFCC-QIO by noon the next calendar day.
  • Provide a copy of the submitted documentation to beneficiaries if requested.
  • They may not be able to submit a claim/ patient bill on timely requests until QIO determination has been made, but the patient does not have to remain hospitalized during this time period either.

BFCC- QIO (Livanta or Acentra Health pending your region) must be available 24/7 to accept requests and notify hospitals of receipt. The review will consist of validating the MCSN delivery and document and reviewing the appropriate documentation. 

They will be required to issue their determinations within one calendar day for timely requests and two days for untimely ones.  Their notifications must detail the determination rationale, payment consequences, and appeal procedures.

BFCC-QIO determinations are binding unless a beneficiary request’s expedited reconsideration. These requests must adhere to specified timeframes, allowing dissatisfied beneficiaries another opportunity to challenge the reclassification decision.

Clarification still needed:

In the final ruling but NOT mentioned in the Medicare Claims Processing Manual or the MLN 

The final ruling confirmed that the MOON is not required for delivery of the MCSN as not every applicable patient that is changed from inpatient to observation, meets the MOON qualification of the anticipated 24 hours of observation services. 

So, there could be rare instances where a Medicare Part A only patient who is changed from inpatient to outpatient receive a condition code 44 notification, then have observation services ordered, which requires an MCSN and if observation is expected to continue for the estimated 24 hours, would then receive a MOON. 

The ruling also stated that if the patient qualified for the MCSN, appeals to the BFCC-QIO and wins, which means the inpatient admission is appropriate.  The ruling comments state that the “beneficiary would be deemed an inpatient under the original hospital admission order” and thus would appropriately need to receive an IMM notice prior to discharge since they have returned to inpatient status.

Example Scenarios:

Medicare Pt A only patient admitted as inpatient, next day converts to outpatient and OBS services started- CC44 process & MCSN is given.  The patient discharges later that day- no MOON needed.

Medicare Pt A & B patient admitted as inpatient, next day converts to outpatient and OBS services started- CC44 process, patient will stay over night MOON given, discharged in am, no MCSN given because it is less than 3 days.  

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM

Tiffany Ferguson is CEO of Phoenix Medical Management, Inc., the care management company. Tiffany serves on the ACPA Observation Subcommittee. Tiffany is a contributor to RACmonitor, Case Management Monthly, and commentator for Finally Friday. After practicing as a hospital social worker, she went on to serve as Director of Case Management and quickly assumed responsibilities in system level leadership roles for Health and Care Management and c-level responsibility for a large employed medical group. Tiffany received her MSW at UCLA. She is a licensed social worker, ACM, and CMAC certified.

Related Stories

The Impact of CDI and Coding Professionals

The Impact of CDI and Coding Professionals

I often begin my day with an environmental scan. Last week, an article from Becker’s Clinical Leadership caught my eye, “Hospital mortality, infectionrates improve despite

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24