Master the upcoming ICD-10 code and IPPS changes! Prepare your team for the upcoming changes taking effect on October 1. Discover the benefits of IPPSPalooza and how it can drive your success. Click here >

MS-DRG Compliance Risk with Principal Diagnosis

Being complacent is not being compliant!

Have you noticed the ongoing compliance risk warning that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) has published regarding Medicare-Severity Diagnostic Related Groups (MS-DRGs)? This, of course, can be directly linked to the principal diagnosis code selection made for the inpatient encounter (admission/discharge).

Identifying the “principal diagnosis” can be challenging even for the experienced and expert coding professional. The Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting are essential for all coding professionals, no matter what healthcare setting(s) you work in.

There are four sections to the Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting. Section I contains the coding classification conventions, general guidelines, and chapter-specific guidelines – this section applies to all healthcare settings. Section II is “Selection of the Principal Diagnosis,” which applies to the inpatient setting; Section III contains the guidelines for “Selection of Additional diagnosis” (often we refer to this as the secondary diagnosis guidelines for the inpatient setting); and Section IV is for outpatient hospital and physician settings.

Within Section II, Selection of Principal Diagnosis, we have two primary and very important instructions that must be followed: a) the circumstances of inpatient admission always govern the selection of principal diagnosis; and b) the principal diagnosis is defined in the Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Set (UHDDS) as “that condition established after study to be chiefly responsible for occasioning the admission of the patient to the hospital for care.” These two guidelines (rules) really drive the accuracy of the principal diagnosis.

Other Section II principal diagnosis selection guidelines cover the following:

  1. Codes for symptoms, signs, and ill-defined conditions;
  2. Two or more interrelated conditions, each potentially meeting the definition for principal diagnosis;
  3. Two or more diagnoses that equally meet the definition for principal diagnosis;
  4. Two or more comparative or contrasting conditions;
  5. A symptom(s) followed by contrasting/comparative diagnoses (this was deleted effective October 2014);
  6. Original treatment plan not carried out;
  7. Complications of surgery and other medical care;
  8. Uncertain Diagnosis;
  9. Admission from observation unit and admission following medical observation;
  10. Admission following post-operative observation;
  11. Admission from outpatient surgery; and
  12. Admissions/encounters for rehabilitation.

The principal diagnosis is the single most changed code in third-party audits, and it defines the entire subsequent coding structure (and ultimately, the inpatient MS-DRG payment). This means that in order to achieve coding accuracy, capture severity and acuity, obtain the most optimal reimbursement, and achieve the highest levels of compliance, the accuracy of the determined principal diagnosis is vital.

The circumstances of admission are essential to read over carefully in the medical record. Again, the principal diagnosis is defined in the Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Set (UHDDS) as “that condition established after study to be chiefly responsible for occasioning the admission of the patient to the hospital for care.” Once the circumstances are identified, then apply the principal diagnosis definition to the encounter.

In a February 2021 report, the OIG identified some MS-DRGs as carrying high risk. This report was titled “Trend Toward More Expensive Inpatient Hospital Stays in Medicare Emerged Before COVID-19 and Warrants Further Scrutiny.” We need to take note of this report and be auditing regularly our own inpatient encounters for accuracy. Another key factor to focus on is the length of stay (LOS), as each MS-DRG has a designated length of stay, and the OIG did find low LOS in high-paying MS-DRGs, which raised red flags. Compare the actual LOS to the geometric LOS of the MS-DRG to help identify any potential encounters that may represent a compliance risk.

Some specific MS-DRGs that are frequent compliance targets include the following:

  • DRG 870 SEPTICEMIA OR SEVERE SEPSIS WITH MV >96 HOURS;
  • DRG 871 SEPTICEMIA OR SEVERE SEPSIS WITHOUT MV >96 HOURS WITH MCC;
  • DRG 872 SEPTICEMIA OR SEVERE SEPSIS WITHOUT MV >96 HOURS WITHOUT MCC;
  • DRG 192 SIMPLE PNEUMONIA AND PLEURISY WITH MCC;
  • DRG 193 SIMPLE PNEUMONIA AND PLEURISY WITH CC;
  • DRG 194 SIMPLE PNEUMONIA AND PLEURISY WITHOUT CC/MCC;
  • 981 EXTENSIVE O.R. PROCEDURES UNRELATED TO PRINCIPAL DIAGNOSIS WITH MCC;
  • 982 EXTENSIVE O.R. PROCEDURES UNRELATED TO PRINCIPAL DIAGNOSIS WITH CC;
  • 983 EXTENSIVE O.R. PROCEDURES UNRELATED TO PRINCIPAL DIAGNOSIS WITHOUT CC/MCC;
  • 987 NON-EXTENSIVE O.R. PROCEDURES UNRELATED TO PRINCIPAL DIAGNOSIS WITH MCC;
  • 988  NON-EXTENSIVE O.R. PROCEDURES UNRELATED TO PRINCIPAL DIAGNOSIS WITH CC; and
  • 989  NON-EXTENSIVE O.R. PROCEDURES UNRELATED TO PRINCIPAL DIAGNOSIS WITHOUT CC/MCC.


In addition, look closely at MS-DRGs with a single CC/MCC assigned, as this has also been an area of compliance risk. You can access this OIG report at: https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/OEI-02-18-00380.pdf

Coding professionals should review and understand diagnosis code sequencing guidelines. For example, there are several guidelines related to the sequencing of respiratory failure as the principal diagnosis:

  • Respiratory failure and other acute conditions (acute respiratory failure and acute MI);
  • Respiratory failure and another respiratory condition;
  • Respiratory failure and a non-respiratory condition; and
  • Chapter-specific guidelines including OB, HIV, newborns, poisoning, and overdose.

Moving the diagnosis code from a principal to a secondary diagnosis code will impact the MS-DRG and reimbursement. If there is unclear diagnostic information, this will mark a query opportunity for clarification. Ensure that the query process is timely and appropriate, following the American Health Information Management Association/Association of Clinical Documentation Integrity Specialists (AHIMA/ACDIS) 2019 Practice Brief on querying.

Coded data goes farther, and we do more with it than ever before, making it an imperative that health information management (HIM) professionals stay abreast of many rapid changes in the coding guidelines and alpha and tabular instructions. Complete documentation and coding are linked to the value of data in terms of patient care, quality, severity of illness (SOI), and risk of mortality (ROM). Conduct regular audits and provide education; these are best practices across healthcare settings, but certainly in light of the above MS-DRG compliance risks. As part of the audit process, ensure that there is a “rebilling” or refunding step included for any overpayments identified.

First and foremost, be sure that your coding staff is striving for principal diagnosis accuracy. Always follow the Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting, always follow American Hospital Association (AHA) Coding Clinic advice, and always have supporting clinical documentation for the ICD-10-CM code(s). Being proactive is better than being reactive, when it comes to compliance and diminishing risk.

I often remind fellow HIM, coding, and CDI professionals that yes, mistakes happen, but being complacent is not being compliant!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Print

Gloryanne Bryant, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCDS

Gloryanne is an HIM coding professional and leader with more than 40 years of experience. She has an RHIA, CDIP, CCS, and a CCDS. For the past six years she has been a regular speaker and contributing author for ICD10monitor and Talk Ten Tuesdays. She has conducted numerous educational programs on ICD-10-CM/PCS and CPT coding and continues to do so. Ms. Bryant continues to advocate for compliant clinical documentation and data quality. She is passionate about helping healthcare have accurate and reliable coded data.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering the Two-Midnight Rule: Keys to Navigating Short-Stay Admissions with Confidence

Mastering the Two-Midnight Rule: Keys to Navigating Short-Stay Admissions with Confidence

The CMS Two-Midnight Rule and short-stay audits are here to stay, impacting inpatient and outpatient admissions, ASC procedures, and Medicare Parts C & D. New for 2024, the Two-Midnight Rule applies to Medicare Advantage patients, requiring differentiation between Medicare plans affecting Case Managers, Utilization Review, and operational processes and knowledge of a vital distinction between these patients that influences post-discharge medical reviews and compliance risk. Join Michael G. Calahan for a comprehensive webcast covering federal laws for all admission processes. Gain the knowledge needed to navigate audits effectively and optimize patient access points, personnel, and compliance strategies. Learn Two-Midnight Rule essentials, Medicare Advantage implications, and compliance best practices. Discover operational insights for short-stay admissions, outpatient observation, and the ever-changing Inpatient-Only Listing.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
September 19, 2023
Secondary Diagnosis Coding: A Deep Dive into Guidelines and Best Practices

Secondary Diagnosis Coding: A Deep Dive into Guidelines and Best Practices

Explore comprehensive guidelines and best practices for secondary diagnosis coding in our illuminating webcast. Delve into the intricacies of accurately assigning secondary diagnosis codes to ensure precise medical documentation. Learn how to navigate complex scenarios and adhere to coding regulations while enhancing coding proficiency. Our expert-led webcast covers essential insights, including documentation requirements, sequencing strategies, and industry updates. Elevate your coding skills and stay current with the latest coding advancements so you can determine the correct DRG assignment to optimize reimbursement, support medical decision-making, and maintain compliance.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
September 20, 2023
Principal Diagnosis Coding: Mastering Selection and Sequencing

Principal Diagnosis Coding: Mastering Selection and Sequencing

Enhance your inpatient coding precision and revenue with Principal Diagnosis Coding: Mastering Selection and Sequencing. Join our expert-led webcast to conquer the challenges of principal diagnosis selection and sequencing. We’ll decode the intricacies of ICD-10-CM guidelines, equipping you with a clear grasp of the rules and the official UHDDS principal diagnosis definition. Uncover the crucial role of coding conventions, master the sequencing of related conditions, and confidently tackle cases with equally valid principal diagnoses.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
September 14, 2023
2024 IPPS Summit: Final Rule Update with Expert Insights and Analysis

2024 IPPS Summit: Final Rule Update with Expert Insights and Analysis

Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY24 Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) Final Rule, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, plus insights, analysis and answers to questions from the country’s most respected subject matter experts.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
2024 IPPS Summit Day 3: MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

2024 IPPS Summit Day 3: MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

This third session in our 2024 IPPS Summit will feature a review of FY24 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by senior healthcare consultant Laurie Johnson, with bonus insights and analysis from two acclaimed subject matter experts

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
August 17, 2023

Trending News