Medicare May Bleed You Dry – Working With Blood Deductibles

Hospitals need to submit Medicare bad debt lists on their cost reports.

I was working on a project recently, reviewing bad Medicare debts for a client. I noticed a reduction for a code I do not see a lot on a claim with Medicare primary and Medicaid secondary. It was code 66: “blood deductible.” 

Most often, the Medicare deductible amount for inpatient claims equals the Medicare deductible published in the Federal Register for the year. 

What happened? Medicare Part A will help cover the cost of blood that patients get in a hospital as an inpatient. In most cases, a hospital will get blood for free, from a blood bank. If this is the case, patients are not responsible for replacing it or paying for it. If the hospital must purchase it, patients must have the blood donated, or pay the hospital for the first three units of blood they get within a calendar year.

Hospitals report red blood provided using revenue code 381, and whole blood using revenue code 382. One of the problems for hospitals is that since they only receive a fixed payment under the Medicare prospective payment system, they do not get extra payments for blood transfused to patients.  If the patient does not pay, the hospital must collect the blood deductible from the patient.

Adding to the complication is the fact that the hospital usually has no idea if the patient has met their calendar limit for blood deductibles.  The patient may have even received blood at another hospital.

Unless the accounting department catches the unpaid deductible, patient financial services does not even know to collect it. Often, Medicare blood deductible amounts are simply written off to contractual allowance.

So, what can you do? Well, first make sure patient financial services tracks all claims billed with revenue codes 381 and 382. When payments are received, make sure that collectible amounts for blood deductibles are properly posted to accounts. You should also make sure that for Medicare patients also covered by Medicaid, Medicaid takes the blood deductibles into account when computing cost-sharing amounts.

Finally, hospitals need to make sure that when they submit Medicare bad debt lists on their cost reports, the person preparing the cost report does not remove the blood deductible as an error when making the list of Medicare bad debt claims.

Programming Notes:

Listen to Tim Powell’s live reports every Tuesday during Talk Ten Tuesdays, 10-10:30 a.m. EST.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Print

Timothy Powell, CPA, CHCP

Timothy Powell is a nationally recognized expert on regulatory matters, including the False Claims Act, Zone Program Integrity Contractor (ZPIC) audits, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) compliance. He is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and a national correspondent for Monitor Mondays.

Related Stories

Lessons Learned from ACDIS

Lessons Learned from ACDIS

Today and in two weeks, I am going to share some tips I picked up at the ACDIS National Conference in Chicago, May 9 through11.

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Good Faith Estimates Under the No Surprises Act: Compliance and Best Practices

Mastering Good Faith Estimates Under the No Surprises Act: Compliance and Best Practices

The No Surprises Act (NSA) presents a challenge for hospitals and providers who must provide Good Faith Estimates (GFEs) for all schedulable services for self-pay and uninsured patients. Compliance is necessary, but few hospitals have been able to fully comply with the requirements despite being a year into the NSA. This webcast provides an overview of the NSA/GFE policy, its impact, and a step-by-step process to adhere to the requirements and avoid non-compliance penalties.

Mastering E&M Guidelines: Empowering Providers for Accurate Service Documentation and Scenario Understanding in 2023

Mastering E&M Guidelines: Empowering Providers for Accurate Service Documentation and Scenario Understanding in 2023

This expert-guided webcast will showcase tips for providers to ensure appropriate capture of the work performed for a visit. Comprehensive examples will be given that demonstrate documentation gaps and how to educate providers on the documentation necessary to appropriately assign a level of service. You will gain clarification on answers regarding emergency department and urgent care coding circumstances as well as a review of how/when it is appropriate to code for E&M in radiology and more.

June 21, 2023
Breaking Down the Proposed IPPS Rule for FY 2024: Top Impacts You Need to Know

Breaking Down the Proposed IPPS Rule for FY 2024: Top Impacts You Need to Know

Set yourself up for financial and compliance success with expert guidance that breaks down the impactful changes including MS-DRG methodology, surgical hierarchy updates, and many new technology add-on payments (NTAPs). Identify areas of potential challenge ahead of time and master solutions for all 2024 Proposed IPPS changes.

May 24, 2023

Trending News