Let’s start with what seems to be a never-ending topic of conversation: the new policies by Medicare Advantage (MA) plans to deny or reduce payments for inpatient admissions.
Last week Independence Blue Cross announced that starting in March, they will adopting Aetna’s tactic to pay less for inpatient admissions that do not meet “inpatient criteria.” But unlike Aetna, Independence will be using InterQual, rather than MCG, and will only be approving inpatient stays of six days or more without review – whereas Aetna is much more generous and allows five days or longer for a claim to be paid as inpatient.
For those who have not heard about this, the policy derives from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requirement that MA plans follow the Two-Midnight Rule. Apparently, as Aetna’s MA plans saw the number of inpatient admissions climb and profits decline, they realized that they could both follow the Two-Midnight Rule and reduce payments to hospitals by allowing inpatient admission whenever requested, but then set the payment for many of those inpatient admissions at a much lower rate by applying commercial criteria and setting a high bar for payment at the inpatient rate.
And because the patient maintains their inpatient status, CMS has determined that the lower payment is a contractual issue that does not involve them.
This is going to be a growing problem for hospitals without access to both MCG and InterQual. The plans allow a post-payment peer-to-peer discussion, but without access to the actual criteria to know if the MA plan medical director is applying them correctly – and without a physician versed in the use of criteria, these discussions are likely to result in limited success.
A fascinating aspect of this policy is that for 86 percent of medical inpatient Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs), the Medicare geometric mean length of stay (GMLOS) is under five days – and 95 percent are under six days. That means that even if your patient remains hospitalized the “average” length of stay, you may have a significant reduction in your payment from the “appropriate” amount if “criteria” are not met.
I have also discussed here how the new CMS regulations require MA plans to notify the patient within 72 hours if they issue a denial, and many plans are asking the hospital to deliver that notice to the patient. I suggested telling the payers that the obligation is theirs to fulfill and not the hospital, thereby forcing them to figure out how to get it delivered, but Tiffany Ferguson, CEO of Phoenix Medical Management and Talk Ten Tuesdays commentator, has an even better idea.
She suggests telling the payer that you will deliver the denial letter, but that at the same time, you will be asking the patient to sign the Medicare appointment of representative form (CMS-1696), and the hospital then will be filing a formal appeal on behalf of the patient. Now, that is ingenious, as MA plans do not like patient appeals, which must be reviewed and then forwarded to the Quality Independent Contractor (QIC) if not overturned.
Moving on to the never-ending saga of expiring forms, we now need to add the Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN), which expired Jan. 31. As you’d expect, I contacted CMS, and they once again said that the expired form remains valid until the new version is approved. Now, as with the other forms, the content is very similar, but in one way, CMS really has gone out on a limb. The old ABN requires the patient to check one of three boxes about how they want to proceed. The new form changes those small boxes to small circles. It will be interesting to see if that dramatic change gets approved by the Office of Management and Budget.
And finally, you may recall that two weeks ago, I told you about a hospital that was told by a QIO that they could not charge a patient for care because the Detailed Notice of Discharge (DND) was expired. They complained to CMS and finally got an apology from the QIO.
Well, last week the other QIO had an article in their monthly newsletter indicating that the DND is required, but has no effect on the patient’s financial liability.
Clearly, both QIOs received some remedial education from CMS. It is great to see that CMS does take your comments and concerns seriously. They often will not respond directly to your comments and concerns, but they do take action when it is warranted.
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.
Having worked in clinical documentation integrity (CDI) in a variety of roles, I have heard a lot of advice when it comes to the timing
Let’s talk about the term “attending physician.” The simplest definition is the physician primarily responsible for a hospitalized patient’s care. While there may be many
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
