There has been a lot of recent chatter about the applicability of the Two-Midnight Rule to Medicare Advantage (MA) plans. If ever there was rampant confusion about something, it is this. The Final Rule that formally obligated the MA plans, CMS-4201-F, was finalized in April, with the rule stating that the regulations became effective June 5.
But as many have found out, none of the MA plans changed one thing on June 5 – and they were right not to, because the next line in the rule states that “the provisions in this rule are applicable to coverage beginning January 1, 2024.” Now, once again, I would defer to my lawyer colleagues to explain how a rule can have an effective date and a drastically different applicability date, but that’s the way it is. (I suspect that ambiguity is a feature of legal documents and not a flaw, as non-lawyers often view it.)
And I hate to side with the MA plans, but at least for the two-midnight provision, it actually makes sense. Each year MA plans submit bids to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to get contracts to serve as a Part C entity. I suspect there is a giant room full of actuaries that do all sorts of predictions on cost. And for the current calendar year, the MA plans are paid based on their bids submitted back in 2022. And as we all know, back in 2022, the MA plans’ expectation was that for 2023, they would be able to continue to blatantly ignore the Two-Midnight Rule (as they have done, with CMS permission, since 2013). So that means requiring the plans to start following the Two-Midnight Rule in the middle of 2023 would just not be fair to the MA plans, as there would be significantly more inpatient claims to pay, and that would endanger their multi-billion-dollar profits.
As a result, the passage of the rule in April with applicability in 2024 allows them to appropriately adjust their 2024 bids that were due in June to compensate for the costs for all the new inpatient claims. Now, before you attack me, yes, I know that the MA plans are going to do everything they can to avoid approving inpatient admissions, just as they do now. The gamebook may change, but the objective will remain the same.
Interestingly, the confusion over the applicability is not limited to providers. When MA medical directors are asked if they are or will be following the Two-Midnight Rule, the responses vary from “what’s that?” to “oh, that does not apply to us” to “our legal team says our contract with you overrides that.” Ignorance certainly is blissful.
Now, regardless of what the MA plans may say, they will have to follow the Two-Midnight Rule as of January. They must honor the Inpatient-Only List, and there is no ambiguity there. Likewise, they can no longer use their proprietary retrospect-o-scope and deny inpatient admissions when patients die, leave against medical advice, or transfer out. Likewise, they must allow you to consider time spent at a transferring hospital in your counting of midnights.
On the other hand, you can bet they will put all their efforts into claiming that a patient doesn’t actually have a two-midnight expectation, or that the second midnight is not medically necessary, or that the risk is not high enough for the case-by-case exception to apply.
And I will have to admit, in some cases they will be correct. There is tremendous variation in medical care around the country, and often within the same city. How do we address this? Think objectively. Use the medical literature and professional society guidelines. Use your commercial guideline tools like MCG Care Guidelines – not to determine admission status, but the need for hospital care.
And of course, the best and likely most effective strategy will be to get your doctors to justify their inpatient admission decisions and risk assessments in writing. What are they worried about? What are they planning to do? How long will it take? What risk factors place the patient at higher risk than other patients with the same condition?
That will be easy, right?
Literature is ripe with classic phrases that seem timelessly apropos. For example, take the partial federal government shutdown. For days, the phrase repeated in the
Worth a second read considering the fatal shooting of the CEO for United Healthcare. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has outlined critical
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.
Optimize your outpatient clinical documentation and gain comprehensive knowledge from foundational practices to advanced technologies, ensuring improved patient care and organizational and financial success. This webcast bundle provides a holistic approach to outpatient CDI, empowering you to implement best practices from the ground up and leverage advanced strategies for superior results. You will gain actionable insights to improve documentation quality, patient care, compliance, and financial outcomes.
Enhancing outpatient clinical documentation is crucial for maintaining accuracy, compliance, and proper reimbursement in today’s complex healthcare environment. This webcast, presented by industry expert Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, will provide you with actionable strategies to tackle complex challenges in outpatient documentation. You’ll learn how to craft detailed clinical narratives, utilize advanced EHR features, and implement accurate risk adjustment and HCC coding. The session also covers essential regulatory updates to keep your documentation practices compliant. Join us to gain the tools you need to improve documentation quality, support better patient care, and ensure financial integrity.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Healthcare organizations face complex regulatory requirements under the No Surprises Act and Price Transparency rules. These policies mandate extensive fee disclosures across settings, and confusion is widespread—many hospitals remain unaware they must post every contracted rate. Non-compliance could lead to costly penalties, financial loss, and legal risks. Join David M. Glaser Esq. as he shows you how to navigate these regulations effectively.
Protect your facility from unwanted audits! Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, and take a deep dive into both the CMS and AMA guidelines for reporting post operative pain blocks. You’ll learn how to determine if the nerve block is separately codable with real life examples for better understanding. Becky will also cover how to evaluate whether documentation supports medical necessity, offer recommendations for stronger documentation practices, and provide guidance on educating providers about documentation requirements. She’ll include a discussion of appropriate modifier and diagnosis coding assignment so that you can be confident that your billing of post operative pain blocks is fully supported and compliant.
During this RACmonitor webcast Dr. Ronald Hirsch spotlights the areas of the OIG’s Work Plan and the findings of their most recent audits that impact utilization review, case management, and audit staff. He also provides his common-sense interpretation of the prevailing regulations related to those target issues. You’ll walk away better equipped with strategies to put in place immediately to reduce your risk of paybacks, increased scrutiny, and criminal penalties.
Copyright © 2024 ICD10monitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
