Making Late Entries, Addendums, and Corrections to the Medical Record Warrants a Proactive Strategy

Late entries, addendums, or corrections should never be common occurrences.

Medicare coverage guidelines dictate that physician notes are required for support of medical necessity, and this documentation must be available to the Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) upon request. It is strongly recommended that medical practices use proactive strategies to educate your physicians and non-physician providers about the requirements outlined in Medicare’s Policy Manual regarding medically necessary documentation, but also how to apply addendums or late entries, to ensure that the notes and documentation in your patient’s chart, whether electronic or paper, are accurate and relevant.

First, create a Medicare assessment tool (based on an NCD or LCD) that specifies what documentation Medicare requires to consider a medical service medically appropriate.

  • If the tool is for reasonable and necessary durable medical equipment (DME) consideration, such as an orthotic or prosthesis,, provide it to your referring physicians. This tool can also helpful to orthotists and prosthetists as they prepare their documentation.
  • Have a scrubbing protocol to review documentation prior to claim submission to ensure that when addendums are necessary, they will be acceptable. For example, if documentation is missing or does not support the device or service, an addendum should be requested from the physician. A valid addendum must be received before the claim is submitted.
  • When a physician’s corroborating notes are unsatisfactory and requests for additional information fail to deliver the required documentation, you could not only lose billed revenue, but out-of-pocket costs if you are using purchased services and equipment for DME. It is imperative that staff are trained on documentation protocols.

However, what happens when the proactive approach does not work? While corrections to medical records should be avoided, whenever possible, it cannot always be avoided.

When a deficiency is discovered in a provider’s notes, it is common practice to create a late entry or an addendum, or make a minor change to the medical record. It is important to know how to correctly make the changes, but first, it is important to know the difference between a late entry and an addendum:

A late entry is made to the medical record when information that was absent from the original entry is recorded after the original note was created, dated, and signed, and possibly billed to a payer.

An addendum to a medical record provides additional information that was not available at the time of the original entry. Addendums are typical for contracts to efficiently update terms and conditions. However, creating an addendum to a patient’s medical record has specific rules that must be followed to avoid potential inference of a fraudulent note. Addendums made after the claim is submitted will not be considered when Medicare reviews the medical record.

Medicare’s policy on late entries and addendums can be found in the Program Integrity Manual, Chapter 3, §3.3.2.5:
 
Corrections to the medical record prior to the claim’s submission and/or medical review will be considered in determining the validity of the services billed.
 
If changes appear in the record following the payment determination based on medical review, only the original record will be reviewed in determining the payment of services billed.

When amending the medical record, the following guidelines should be followed:

  •  Clearly identify whether the entry is a late entry or an addendum.
  •  Enter the additional information as additional information. Do not make it appear that the information you are adding was part of the original document.
    •  Enter the date of the late entry or addendum.
    •  The late entry or addendum must be signed.
    •  Identify the original content.
    •  Make sure the late entry or addendum does not override the original entry.
    •  If you were not the author of the original entry, note that you confirmed the late entry or addendum with the original author. (It is not recommended that ancillary staff enter addendums for physician notes. It should come from the original provider for best practices.)
    •  Note the justification for the modification.

Late entries, addendums, or corrections should never be common occurrences, as they could be seen by Medicare as evidence of inadequate practices, so it is important to review your documentation for accuracy and ensure that correct and complete information is entered.

A best practice should always be to take proactive approaches to obtain compliant medical records, but when noncompliant records are received, it is important to have compliance guidelines for treating late entries, addendums, and corrections to avoid unnecessary losses.

I would start with the Medicare Program Integrity Manual. It is clear, concise, and a good place to start your compliance workflow on this important aspect of clinical documentation integrity.

Programming Note: Listen to Terry Fletcher report this subject live today during Talk Ten Tuesday, 10-10:30 a.m. EST.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Terry A. Fletcher BS, CPC, CCC, CEMC, CCS, CCS-P, CMC, CMSCS, ACS-CA, SCP-CA, QMGC, QMCRC, QMPM

Terry Fletcher, BS, CPC, CCC, CEMC, CCS, CCS-P, CMC, CMSCS, CMCS, ACS-CA, SCP-CA, QMGC, QMCRC, is a healthcare coding consultant, educator, and auditor with more than 30 years of experience. Terry is a past member of the national advisory board for AAPC, past chair of the AAPCCA, and an AAPC national and regional conference educator. Terry is the author of several coding and reimbursement publications, as well as a practice auditor for multiple specialty practices around the country. Her coding and reimbursement specialties include cardiology, peripheral cardiology, gastroenterology, E&M auditing, orthopedics, general surgery, neurology, interventional radiology, and telehealth/telemedicine. Terry is a member of the ICD10monitor editorial board and a popular panelist on Talk Ten Tuesdays.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

I022426_SQUARE

Fracture Care Coding: Reduce Denials Through Accurate Coding, Sequencing, and Modifier Use

Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.

February 24, 2026
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24