Livanta and CMS Have Lost Their Collective Minds over “Risk”

Livanta and CMS Have Lost Their Collective Minds over “Risk”

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following op-ed is exclusively comprised of the opinions of the individual author, which are not necessarily shared by RACmonitor or Monitor Mondays.

In a recent RACmonitor article, Dr. Ronald Hirsch provided insights into the “case-by-case” exception to the Two-Midnight Rule, specifically addressing “risk” as a justification for short-stay inpatient admissions   (https://link.edgepilot.com/s/ec2ef30b/clhrXL2sS0aT-PFZLANl9Q?u=https://racmonitor.medlearn.com/cms-tells-livanta-to-reassess-short-stay-memo/)  

Let me begin by stating right away that using risk factors as support for an inpatient admission is contrary to the Two-Midnight Rule. I will explain.

At the core of the Two-Midnight Rule is the requirement that care can be delivered safely only in the hospital, and not with intermittent care. That’s pretty clear. The Rule screams “prove it.” 

Livanta’s claim that they do not exist to second-guess physician decision-making is hilarious at face value. Second-guessing physician decision-making is the basis for each and every coverage decision. Otherwise, what would be the need for costly investment in competent utilization management (UM) professionals? How would I earn my bloated paycheck?

It’s not that risk as justification for inpatient admission has no role. I use it frequently. Risk of readmission, risks to optimal recovery for lack of close outpatient follow-up, lack of ready access to specialists, risks posed by access to caregivers or other social determinants of health (SDoH) – all of these are important. The difference is context. The risk does not stand alone. Treatment typically deferred to intermittent care is still treatment if administered. The patient must be under active treatment to effect an optimal recovery, specific to them, which cannot be deferred. 

As it applies to a one-day stay, I am not ready to embrace “risk,” even if the mandate came from a deity. 

Heightened risk never worked for me in my years fighting Medicare auditors, including at the administrative law judge (ALJ) level. It’s not for lack of trying. As time went on, I could no longer support the risk argument. Risk is noteworthy; manifestation of risk is demanded. 

Subjectivity is the best argument against any reliance on the risk argument. Until there is a textbook definition with a high degree of specificity, I will not rely on it. And what about the frequency of use? What is a reasonable frequency of short inpatient stays for risk? How will this be reported on Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report (PEPPER)? 

Who will pay for this drain on the trust fund?

As to Medicare Advantage plans, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) tolerates deviance from regulation on just about every issue of importance. Without a doubt, CMS will allow health plans to leverage the lack of clarity. A good argument exists already: health plans approve admissions on a stay-by-stay basis anyway, so use of artificial intelligence (AI) or not is irrelevant. There is abundant opportunity for loophole exploitation, and who can blame them, in our profit-driven perversity we call healthcare. 

It’s not that risk plays no role in an admission decision. The presence of risk alone is a yellow flag that deserves attention. If, for example, during an observation stay, a patient with known risk factors indeed manifests significant instability in one of those known factors, it is reasonable to admit them if a stay will meet the Rule. The treatment plan must demonstrate active treatment for that instability. And therein lies a glimmer of hope: documentation of the need to consider a risk factor of such significance that admission, short stay or otherwise, can only be managed in the hospital, with a treatment plan that demonstrates the importance of risk in medical decision-making. 

There it is again. Only physician documentation can carry the day.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Marvin D. Mitchell, RN, BSN, MBA

Marvin D. Mitchell, RN, BSN, MBA, is the director of case management and social work at San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, east of Los Angeles. Building programs from the ground up has been his passion in every venue where case management is practiced. Mitchell is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and makes frequent appearances on Monitor Mondays.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

2026 IPPS Masterclass 3: Master MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 3: MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

This third session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review of FY26 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 14, 2025
2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 2: Master ICD-10-PCS Changes

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 2: Master ICD-10-PCS Changes

This second session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review the FY26 changes to ICD-10-PCS codes. This information will be presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 13, 2025
2026 IPPS Masterclass 1: Master ICD-10-CM Changes

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 1: Master ICD-10-CM Changes

This first session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature an in-depth explanation of FY26 changes to ICD-10-CM codes and guidelines, CCs/MCCs, and revisions to the MCE, presented by presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 12, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.

June 19, 2025
Open Door Forum Webcast Series

Open Door Forum Webcast Series

Bring your questions and join the conversation during this open forum series, live every Wednesday at 10 a.m. EST from June 11–July 30. Hosted by Chuck Buck, these fast-paced 30-minute sessions connect you directly with top healthcare experts tackling today’s most urgent compliance and policy issues.

June 11, 2025
Open Door Forum: The Changing Face of Addiction: Coding, Compliance & Care

Open Door Forum: The Changing Face of Addiction: Coding, Compliance & Care

Substance abuse is everywhere. It’s a complicated diagnosis with wide-ranging implications well beyond acute care. The face of addiction continues to change so it’s important to remember not just the addict but the spectrum of extended victims and the other social determinants and legal ramifications. Join John K. Hall, MD, JD, MBA, FCLM, FRCPC, for a critical Q&A on navigating substance abuse in 2025.  Register today and be a part of the conversation!

July 16, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24