New CDC mask guidance, plus release of the CMS OPPS proposed rule highlight week in the nation’s capital.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is under pressure to revise its guidance and recommend that vaccinated people go back to wearing masks in public. As you may remember, in May, the CDC changed its guidance to say that only non-vaccinated individuals needed to wear masks and maintain social distance. However, deaths due to COVID have increased nearly 50 percent over the past week, to an average of nearly 250 a day.
In the face of rising COVID cases, Los Angeles has brought back its mask mandate for both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals; this morning, St. Louis did the same.
This past weekend, Dr. Anthony Fauci said that the federal government is considering a change in the recommendations, but for now, the CDC says it is staying with its current guidance that vaccinated people need not wear masks. The CDC has emphasized that local government can and should make different decisions, based on their own numbers.
In related news, this week the American Hospital Association (AHA) began encouraging hospitals to require their employees to get vaccinated. The New York Times has reported that a quarter of all hospital employees remain unvaccinated.
Finally, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released its 2022 Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) proposed rule last week. In it, the administration suggested upping the penalty against hospitals that don’t comply with the transparency rule that has been in effect since January of this year. The rule requires hospitals to upload spreadsheets that list negotiated rates with each of its payors, and it’s those spreadsheets – or machine-readable files – that hospitals are dragging their feet on.
According to one recent report, less than 6 percent of hospitals are in compliance with the requirements, and many hospitals indicated that they were choosing to pay the $300-per-day penalty instead of complying. The OPPS rule released last week proposed upping that to $5,500 a day for hospitals with more than 30 beds. That would mean a $2 million fine for a hospital that remained out of compliance for a year.
The transparency rules come from a single sentence in former President Obama’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, from which the Trump Administration created multiple requirements for both hospitals and insurers. Those requirements survived court challenges and heavy lobbying by industry opponents, and now the Biden Administration has signaled that it too is serious about enforcing them.
An aside here: in this day and age, can you imagine any policy initiative in any industry that is not only agreed upon, but also championed through three radically different presidential administrations?
So why are both sides of the aisle eager for these requirements, while providers and payers are pushing back on them?
There’s a lot at stake: making healthcare pricing transparent, public, and free will have a tremendous impact on provider-payer contract negotiations, hospital pricing, and payor reimbursement. New companies have already popped up that are gathering this data, then analyzing and monetizing it. As we’ve seen, the press is already picking up on some of the more irrational and egregious pricing that has been made public, and we’ll see even more of this as more of the information is published.
In short, transparency requirements are here to stay, they are going to impact the way hospitals and insurers do business, and they’ll be a part of the national conversation on healthcare for many years to come.
Programming Note: Listen to Matthew Albright’s legislative update, sponsored by Zelis, Mondays on Monitor Mondays, 10 Eastern.
As the federal government shutdown drags into its fifth week, the collapse of key safety-net supports such as nutrition benefits, health-insurance subsidies, and the disruption
With so much focus within the federal government on abuse, fraud, and waste, I thought it might be helpful to review a couple of federal
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
