Important Coding Update: Bipolar I Versus Bipolar II

Important Coding Update: Bipolar I Versus Bipolar II

When assigning for behavioral health, coders note the difference in the codes for bipolar disorder type I and bipolar disorder type II, but often wonder: what is the difference between them? While they are both are considered to be mood disorders, there are some differences we will examine here. 

First, according to World Health Organization (WHO) data from 2019, bipolar disorder affects around 40 million people. The data further notes that men and women are affected by bipolar disorder equally. It is one of the leading causes of disability globally, and on average, people who have bipolar disorder die 10 years earlier than the general population. 

When we think of bipolar disorder, we may think about a person who has a really high mood at times and a really low mood at other times. These extreme mood swings are characteristic for this condition. The high moods indicate the so-called “manic” phase of bipolar. The patient may feel very happy, have lots of energy, and may not sleep as they normally would.

During this phase the patient may move from one thing to the next, with difficulty concentrating. They may also be more restless or irritable than usual. 

In the “depressive” phase of the disorder, the patient may also have difficulty concentrating and may experience a change in their sleep pattern. In this phase, however, as the name suggests, the patient will feel sadness: they don’t enjoy things as they did before. They may feel tired, have no energy, feel hopeless, and may even have suicidal thoughts. 

In the Alphabetic Index, we note an entry for “hypomanic.” While a hypomanic phase is similar to a manic phase, the symptoms are not as intense, which allows the patient to be able to function more normally. We would assign F31.0 for Bipolar disorder, current episode, hypomanic.

When we are assigning for bipolar disorder, starting at our Alphabetic Index with Disorder, bipolar, we see that type I is a non-essential modifier. Bipolar disorder type II has a separate entry. So, back to our original question: what is the difference?

According to the WHO, patients with bipolar type I have had one or more manic episodes with episodes of depression. Over time, the depressive episodes become more common. Patients with bipolar disorder type II have had one or more of the hypomanic type episodes and at least one depressive episode. Patients with bipolar type II have no history of a manic episode.

Bipolar type I codes identify the current episode (manic, depressed, or mixed), identify if psychotic features are present, and identify the severity, if psychotic features are not present. If psychotic features are identified, it is included and assigned as severe with psychotic features. Bipolar with manic episode would be assigned to F31.10-F31.2. Bipolar with depressed episode would be assigned to F31.30-F31.5. Mixed bipolar episodes would be assigned to F31.60-F31.64. Category F31.7 classifies cases currently in remission, identifying by the most recent episode. 

We have one code for bipolar disorder type II, F31.81. As with many of our other disease and disorder codes, we also have an option for “other” and an unspecified option. Bipolar disorder groups to MS-DRG 885, Psychoses. There is an Excludes 1 note at F31 Bipolar Disorder for both single-episode and recurrent major depressive disorder.

We also have Coding Clinic guidance from the first quarter of 2020 instructing that bipolar disorder includes both depression and mania, and it is more important to capture the bipolar disorder code when both conditions are documented.

It is important for us as coders to have a good understanding of diseases and conditions, in order to ensure we are assigning as completely and correctly as possible.

Programming note:

Listen every Tuesday when Christine Geiger reports the latest coding news and information on Talk Ten Tuesday with Chuck Buck and Angela Comfort, 10 Eastern.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC

Chris began her health information management career in 1986, working in hospitals and as a consultant. With expertise in ICD-10 coding, audits, and education, she has contributed to compliance reviews and coding programs. She holds a Master's from Washington University, a B.S. from Saint Louis University, and has taught coding at Saint Louis University. Chris is certified in HCC risk-adjusted coding and is active in health management associations.

Related Stories

H.R. 1 Impact on Coding

H.R. 1 Impact on Coding

H.R. 1 doesn’t directly rewrite ICD-10 or CPT, but it does change the environment in which you’re coding. The impact is mostly indirect – through

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24