Impact of COVID-19 on SDoH and SDoMH Revealed in National Study

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on society has more layers than the largest onion! A new national survey led by researchers from Northeastern, Harvard, Northwestern, and Rutgers universities sheds glaring light on the current impact to communities and concerns over health disparities, and validates concern for the general and mental health of at-risk persons and populations.

The report, State of the Nation: A 50-State COVID-19 Survey, is published through The COVID-19 Consortium for Understanding the Public’s Policy Preferences Across States. A total of 18,132 U.S. residents were surveyed in all 50 states and the District of Columbia between May 16 and May 31. 

The results span concerns associated with the social determinants of health (SDoH) and social determinants of mental health (SDoMH):

  • Forty-two percent of people whose lives had been greatly disrupted by the virus reported moderate to severe depressive symptoms. Only 19 percent of those whose lives hadn’t been disrupted as much reported these symptoms.
  • Over 27 percent of U.S. residents surveyed presented with symptoms of moderate to severe depression, a rate more than three times higher than the 8 percent reported among the overall population in 2016.
  • The impact of the pandemic, as well as current state of racial injustice, are addressed by the report, with the survey taking place within days of the killing of George Floyd by police officers in Minneapolis.
  • Major concerns were expressed about the health, financial stability, job loss, and education by all survey participants, though the rate was significantly higher among non-white respondents.
    • The proportion of respondents worried about getting the virus was a minimum of least 12 points higher for other racial groups than white U.S. residents.
    • Less than 31 percent of white respondents indicated that they were “somewhat” or “very” concerned about job loss, compared to 53 percent of Hispanic populations, 51 percent of Asian-Americans, and 43 percent of African-Americans.
    • The proportion of persons concerned about education and childcare were 13 and 21 points higher, respectively, among non-whites, as compared to whites.

Finally, inequities emerged in the dollars received through the stimulus package. Over 73 percent of white participants reported receiving their relief payments, compared to 57 percent of African-Americans, 55 percent of Asian-Americans, and 56 percent of Hispanic respondents.

An interactive version of the report is available online at covidstates.org/charts.  

Monitor Mondays listeners were also surveyed on their perspectives of the data’s value; the survey results can be accessed here.

Programming Note:  Ellen Fink-Samnick is a permanent panelist on Monitor Mondays. Listen to her live reporting every Monday at 10 a.m. EST.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Print

Ellen Fink-Samnick, MSW, ACSW, LCSW, CCM, CRP

Ellen Fink-Samnick is an award-winning healthcare industry expert. She is the esteemed author of books, articles, white papers, and knowledge products. A subject matter expert on the Social Determinants of Health, her latest books, The Essential Guide to Interprofessional Ethics for Healthcare Case Management and Social Determinants of Health: Case Management’s Next Frontier (with foreword by Dr. Ronald Hirsch), are published through HCPro. She is a panelist on Monitor Mondays, frequent contributor to Talk Ten Tuesdays, and member of the RACmonitor Editorial Board.

Related Stories

Help: What Do I Do Now?

Help: What Do I Do Now?

The PHE has ended and the three-day SNF rule has returned. Following up on my previous article posted in April regarding the return of the

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Good Faith Estimates Under the No Surprises Act: Compliance and Best Practices

Mastering Good Faith Estimates Under the No Surprises Act: Compliance and Best Practices

The No Surprises Act (NSA) presents a challenge for hospitals and providers who must provide Good Faith Estimates (GFEs) for all schedulable services for self-pay and uninsured patients. Compliance is necessary, but few hospitals have been able to fully comply with the requirements despite being a year into the NSA. This webcast provides an overview of the NSA/GFE policy, its impact, and a step-by-step process to adhere to the requirements and avoid non-compliance penalties.

Mastering E&M Guidelines: Empowering Providers for Accurate Service Documentation and Scenario Understanding in 2023

Mastering E&M Guidelines: Empowering Providers for Accurate Service Documentation and Scenario Understanding in 2023

This expert-guided webcast will showcase tips for providers to ensure appropriate capture of the work performed for a visit. Comprehensive examples will be given that demonstrate documentation gaps and how to educate providers on the documentation necessary to appropriately assign a level of service. You will gain clarification on answers regarding emergency department and urgent care coding circumstances as well as a review of how/when it is appropriate to code for E&M in radiology and more.

June 21, 2023
Breaking Down the Proposed IPPS Rule for FY 2024: Top Impacts You Need to Know

Breaking Down the Proposed IPPS Rule for FY 2024: Top Impacts You Need to Know

Set yourself up for financial and compliance success with expert guidance that breaks down the impactful changes including MS-DRG methodology, surgical hierarchy updates, and many new technology add-on payments (NTAPs). Identify areas of potential challenge ahead of time and master solutions for all 2024 Proposed IPPS changes.

May 24, 2023

Trending News