The WHO’s definitions of gender-related issues continue to cause controversy.
The recent news coming out of Geneva, Switzerland and reported here by ICD10monitor that the World Health Organization (WHO) had released its 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) was greeted by most healthcare professionals as good news.
An exception was Harold Maio.
Maio, the former editor of the Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal once published by Boston University, wasted no time in responding to ICD10monitor to express his ire. In particular, Maio took a swipe at the WHO’s shifting of gender incongruence from mental health to a new chapter on sexual health.
“(The) WHO says (being) transgender is no longer a mental illness, and in the same breath, (suggests that) mental illness carries a stigma,” he wrote. “That is a slap in the face. By its actions, (WHO) offered an olive branch to one group and slapped another in the face.”
Maio was referring to a CNN news report in which Lale Say, MD, Coordinator of WHO’s Adolescents and at-Risk Populations team, was quoted as saying “it (being transgender) was taken out from the mental health disorders because we had a better understanding that this wasn’t actually a mental health condition, and leaving it there was causing stigma.”
The word “stigma,” when coupled with mental health, literally sets off alarms on Maio’s computer. In fact, Maio, a self-proclaimed mental health advocate whose main focus is language, told ICD10monitor that he receives between 20 and 50 such alerts daily from English media throughout the world.
“I try to respond to each one, though sometimes the numbers overwhelm me and I have to stop,” Maio said. “My responses are dwarfed by the number of readers of the newspapers and magazines to which I respond.”
In one email received by Maio and shared with ICD10monitor, the writer noted that research has focused heavily on the stigmatized individual and much less so on the person who is doing the stigmatizing.
“This may derive,” the author wrote to Maio, “in part from the fact that it is easier to identify the target of the stigma (the disabled, the homeless, the mentally ill, etc.) than it is to identify individuals who are actually engaged in discriminatory behavior and to get them to cooperate in studies focused on why they are stigmatizing others.”
“I am not at all sure that that is so,” Maio said to ICD10monitor. “It is not easier to identify the victim than the victimizer. For whatever reason, however, it is easier to identify with the victimizer than the victim. In the heat of the moment, our abilities to empathize seem impaired.”
What occurs, according to Maio, is we persuade ourselves to widely partner with the group expressing the prejudice (prejudice is a far more accurate term) and identify with what they are doing rather than actually seek to comprehend what they are doing.
“We understand why Hitler directed stigma at Jews, why for generations we directed stigma at rape, why we directed HIV stigma. From each of those we can extrapolate why we currently allow ourselves to cooperate with people who direct stigma at mental illnesses: the answer lies in with which group we ourselves identify, whom we see as a ‘them’ to our ‘us,’” Maio said. “It is the inability to identify with the maligned group that is impaired. I draw this conclusion from such people as Miep Gies and the many others, who despite all the terror at her door, attempted to hide Anne Frank and her family. She identified with the Franks.”
“Today a multitude of voices directs a stigma at mental illnesses, and we largely accept it,” Maio said. “That history impugns people who direct stigmas, seems not to impress us. We listen. We comply. I cannot.”
“Each time a voice issues a stigma, feel the sting. I feel it. No, I need not be the Frank family hiding in an attic in Holland, or the men subjected to deliberate medical neglect in the Tuskegee incident, or the person with HIV left to die, or the survivor of rape. No, I cannot be the student in a university class told there is a stigma to mental illnesses and not react, or the casual reader of newspaper article that says there is,” Maio continued. “I cannot sit idly by, silent, pretending not to be harmed as any organized group says ‘there is’ a stigma to mental illnesses. I fully appreciate the difference between ‘there is’ and ‘there are:’ that there are people who say there is a stigma, as there will always be people who adhere to any prejudice, that there are victimizers, will likely always be so.”
“We each of us have the choice not to be the victimizer, to see the ‘us’ in the ‘them,’ to refuse to participate in any claim of stigma.”
Reference:
Watch the CNN news report on ICD10 and the WHO https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/20/health/transgender-people-no-longer-considered-mentally-ill-trnd/index.html
EDITOR’S NOTE: Ongoing discussion about U.S. disengagement from the World Health Organization (WHO), with withdrawal effective Jan. 22, has refocused attention on how global standards
I often begin my day with an environmental scan. Last week, an article from Becker’s Clinical Leadership caught my eye, “Hospital mortality, infectionrates improve despite
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
