ICD-10 Coding: Good Grief

Confusion exists in coding grief in ICD-10 and DMS-5.

In a moment of despair, I recently called the nationally renowned psychiatrist and author H. Steven Moffic, MD. My wife of some 20 years had passed away only a few days earlier, following a brief and unexpected illness.

Dr. Moffic, as many of you Talk-Ten-Tuesdays listeners know, frequently reports on mental health issues. You might remember that it was Dr. Moffic who reported on the suicide death of Robin Williams – and later, the subsequent suicides of other celebrities, most recently Anthony Bourdain and Kate Spade.

Dr. Moffic and I have become close friends, electronically. My personal call to him on that lonely morning could best be categorized as a call for help. And his words helped me with my grieving. And so, I asked if he could share with others his thoughts about grieving and mourning, and about its dimensions – how long it can last and how deep it can cut.

It turns out, according to Dr. Moffic, that grieving is a confusing subject. Who knew?

The confusion – and differences with DSM 5 and ICD-10 – seem to reflect the uncertainty around the world about when grieving is a normal human process and when it turns into something pathological, including what terminology to use in either case, he told me in an email.

“So ICD-10 has grief as a Z code, as one of the ‘factors influencing health status and contact with health services,’ that is, Z63.4, Bereavement (Uncomplicated),” Dr. Moffic explained. “This does not count as a mental disorder as is stated: ‘normal bereavement reactions appropriate to the culture of the individual concerned and not usually exceeding six months in duration.’”

So, what does it mean when that length of time is exceeded?

“In ICD-10, grief can also be one of the symptoms of an adjustment disorder, F43.0. The upcoming ICD-11 is supposed to include something like a ‘prolonged grief disorder,’” Moffic said. “DSM 5, on the other hand, has nothing on grief other than it is a ‘candidate’ disorder for future consideration as a ‘persistent complex bereavement disorder’ in the Appendix for a ‘condition for future study.’”

What was controversial for DSM 5, according to Moffic, is that the “bereavement exclusion” for the diagnosis of major depression was removed, meaning that bereavement symptoms can qualify for major depression. This is one of the few conditions for which DSM 5 and ICD-10 vary.

What, if any, are the differences among bereavement, grieving, and mourning?

“There are more similarities than differences among the terms,” Moffic said. “Nevertheless, each word can convey some important meanings. ‘Bereavement’ is a noun and refers to the process of ‘grieving,’ or getting over, the loss of someone or something important.”

“Mourning, on the other hand,” according to Moffic, “is sort of like grieving, though it usually implies the add-ons of various social rituals or customs, such as wearing black clothes, which can differ among cultures. Moreover, it has special psychological and historical meaning because of Freud’s well-known book, Mourning and Melancholia.”

“In Freud’s perspective, mourning is a conscious process, whereas in melancholia, a person’s grief is not easily resolved or understood, and this takes place in the unconscious mind,” Moffic added. “Often, there is strong ambivalence and unresolved anger and/or guilt about the deceased. An example might be the death of an abuser who nevertheless was still loved in some ways. Mourning is a healthy, natural process of grieving a loss, whereas melancholia is pathological, associated thereby with complicated and unresolved grief.”

I wanted to know this: how long would the grieving process continue before it became a mental disorder like depression, anxiety, or guilt?

“How long grief continues before it should be considered a mental disorder can’t really be specified,” Moffic explained. “When someone so important to somebody dies, it is normal for the grieving process to never ever really end completely. On the other hand, by 6-12 months, the mourner should be able to function more normally, and usually not be disturbed by thoughts of the loss, but rather be more in gentle touch with positive memories. The distinction between ‘normal’ and ‘not normal’ grief can be an indistinct line at times.”


Programming Note:

Listen to H. Steven Moffic, MD report this story live today during Talk Ten Tuesday, 10-10:30 a.m. ET

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Chuck Buck

Chuck Buck is the publisher of RACmonitor and is the program host and executive producer of Monitor Monday.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 19, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24