It is critical that the CDISs compose their queries to get codable verbiage in response.
In my most recent consulting project, I read many cases and queries regarding pneumonia related to COVID-19, and our Talk Ten Tuesdays listeners have been sending me cases soliciting my opinion as to how to code them.
There are two basic problems with this condition: first, clinically, providers are not sure whether the current pneumonia is from an active case of COVID-19; and second, the providers don’t know how to document it such that the coder can derive the appropriate code.
Let me give you a few examples of the clinical indicators, as presented by the clinical documentation integrity specialists (CDISs) in their queries:
Case 1: Patient with a recent episode of COVID-19 treated with remdesivir and steroids, presents with shortness of breath and fatigue two weeks later. SARS-CoV-2 antibody test negative, PCR negative.
New patchy ground glass infiltrates.
Pulmonary documented “relapsing COVID-19 pneumonia.” Discharge summary states “recently treated for COVID-19 pneumonia.”
Case 2: Admitted with pneumonia (community versus hospital-acquired – Gram negative versus MRSA versus COVID-related). Had been in hospital for seven days, two weeks prior, for COVID-19 pneumonia. CXR with developing bilateral infiltrates.
Pulmonary consult: possible bacterial pneumonia, history of COVID-19 pneumonia, possible sepsis.
DC summary: Pneumonia due to recent COVID-19 infection.
Case 3: Patient admitted with agonal breathing, hypotensive, tachycardic, hypoxic with RLL pneumonia. PCR positive on admission.
COVID-19 infection about a month ago. Attending documented, “the positive test today could be a viral remnant. Also, reportedly the patient has been vaccinated.”
Patient expired within a day. Death summary noted: “death is probably related to sepsis and respiratory failure, probably secondary to pneumonia or COVID-19.”
You can find more examples posed in the Coding Clinic FAQs.
Many COVID-19 infections run their course, and the manifestations resolve promptly. The literature seems to suggest that in some cases, however, there is incomplete eradication of virus from the tissues, and the pathogen burrows deep in clusters of alveoli, the air-filled sacs in the lungs. An abnormal immune response mediated by SARS-CoV-2 may actually spread the infection throughout the lungs. Bronchoscopy sampling may detect the virus, but it may not be replication-competent. If there is no infectivity, is it still considered an active infection, U07.1? Furthermore, patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia can have tissue damage and fibrosis induced by the virus, resulting in an organizing pneumonia, even after the virus is no longer present.
The length of stay for patients with severe COVID-19 infection can be prolonged, often two weeks or more. If the patient waited before presenting for medical care, their discharge date could be almost a month after onset of symptoms. It is conceivable, even likely, that by the time of discharge, their PCR test could be negative. That would not negate the original etiology of the pneumonia. If the patient were admitted for COVID-19 pneumonia, their principal diagnosis would be U07.1, COVID-19 with J12.82, Pneumonia due to coronavirus disease 2019 as a secondary condition, even if the patient no longer tests positive for SARS-CoV-2 upon discharge.
However, it becomes particularly dicey when the patient has an index admission for COVID-19, is treated and released, and returns after deterioration. A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study found that one in 11 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 were readmitted to the same hospital within two months (March-August 2020). Is the pneumonia still a manifestation of the original COVID-19 infection, or has another clinical process intervened?
ICD-10-CM incorporated the new code, J12.82, Pneumonia due to coronavirus disease 2019, in October 2020. There is a “code first” instruction for U07.1, COVID-19. This means that if the provider is diagnosing the patient with COVID-19 pneumonia, the patient is to be coded with underlying COVID-19 at the same time.
We are getting a code for “post-COVID-19 condition” on Oct. 1, 2021, U09.9, straight from the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) version of ICD-10. The ICD-10-CM instruction will be to code first the specific condition that resulted from COVID-19. ICD-10-CM is pretty clear that sequelae do not occur during acute episodes of illness. Additionally, WHO’s instructional note cautions that “this code is not to be used in cases that still are presenting COVID-19.” My interpretation is that J12.82 will not be used with U09.9. This leaves us with the question of what to do with patients who have a delayed pneumonia presentation after completed treatment for acute COVID-19 infection. This is the condition that causes providers to use variable and often conflicting terminology like “relapsing,” “recurrent,” “recent,” and “post-COVID-19.”
If the patient has a secondary bacterial infection and is not believed to have COVID-19 presently, they should have the appropriate code assigned for a different form of pneumonia. If it is documented as “probable gram-negative pneumonia,” J15.6, Pneumonia due to other gram-negative bacteria, would be used. Other bacterial pneumonias would have their corresponding specific codes if an organism was identified, and J15.9, Unspecified bacterial pneumonia, would be the correct way to capture “secondary bacterial pneumonia.” If a viral pneumonia is diagnosed, the code would be J12.9, Viral pneumonia, unspecified. The code that identifies the component of a prior COVID-19 infection would be Z86.16, Personal history of COVID-19.
The situation that proves problematic is the post-acute COVID-19 patient. A categorization schema I found out of the United Kingdom breaks down the three phases seen in this viral scourge best (COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing the long-term effects of COVID-19):
I really like the “ongoing symptomatic COVID-19” description. It explains that the symptoms are persisting longer than typical acute COVID-19, but it establishes that the practitioner still believes there is current COVID-19 infection. This gives the coder permission to pick up U07.1, in my opinion.
Organizing pneumonia (OP) is the entity formerly known as bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia, or BOOP. OP is a process of pulmonary tissue repair that can occur secondary to a lung injury caused by an issue such as an infection, toxin, or radiation; can be associated with other pulmonary diseases, such as vasculitis, lung cancer, or interstitial pneumonitis; or can be idiopathic, referred to as cryptogenic. OP is characterized by lung inflammation and scarring with obstruction of small airways and destruction of alveoli. It seems to be occurring with some frequency, post-COVID-19.
The American Hospital Association/American Health Information Management Association (AHA/AHIMA) FAQs, Question 53, address this patient:
“The provider’s final diagnostic statement lists, ‘Post-COVID-19 organizing pneumonia,’ and the advice is to assign J84.89, Other specified interstitial pulmonary diseases, followed by code B94.8, Sequelae of other specified infectious and parasitic diseases. It is likely that in the future, U09.9 will supplant B94.8, because that code will identify the infectious disease sequela as a post-COVID-19 condition.”
When the documentation is confusing, a query is indicated. It is critical that the CDIS compose their queries to dispel the confusion and get codable verbiage in response. I never condone leading, but we need to give the providers choices that can help them define the current circumstances. Some of this may require education to give them the words they need; e.g., they may not be familiar with the entity of OP. What we don’t want is for the response to the query to set up a clinical validation issue (or, worse yet, to not resolve the question in a codable format).
Let me give you some verbiage that is specific and codable. I recommend you use the same order each time: e.g., current, ongoing symptomatic (which is coded as current); or sequela of previous infection, historical infection. Also, be sure to organize the choices the same way each time, preventing the provider having to search for the choice that applies for today’s patient. The parenthetical codes would not appear in the query – they are included in this article for the CDIS’s and the coder’s reference. I am also including some verbiage that is not specifically for pneumonia:
My opinion is that the linkage of the words “due to,” “secondary to,” “from,” or “as a result of” indicate a sequela, whereas “following,” “after,” or “subsequent to” would indicate personal history. If it is unclear, you need to obtain clarity.
I would not offer an uncertain qualifier in a query, such as “presumed” or “likely.” We can’t code uncertain COVID-19 as definitive. Case 3 set up this issue:
Patient expired within a day. Death summary noted: death is probably related to sepsis and respiratory failure, probably secondary to pneumonia or COVID-19.
A query would be needed to resolve the uncertainty, because “probably COVID-19 pneumonia” must be coded as J18.9, Pneumonia, unspecified organism.
I would check the radiology report; if it notes “viral” or “organizing” or some other descriptor that has a specific ICD-10-CM code, it can be compliantly included in the choices.
Beware of adding in the element of present-on-admission status. If you have too many questions in a single query, your provider may miss one. Don’t give them excessive permutations. Give them the words they need, but don’t put words in their mouths (or on their computers).
Let’s take Case 1 as an example:
Patient with a recent episode of COVID-19 treated with remdesivir and steroids, presents with shortness of breath and fatigue two weeks later. SARS-CoV-2 antibody negative, PCR negative.
New patchy ground glass infiltrates.
Pulmonary documented “relapsing COVID-19 pneumonia.” Discharge summary states “recently treated for COVID-19 pneumonia.”
My query would look something like:
Please clarify the status of current pneumonia and COVID-19:
If unraveling the mystery of COVID-19 status seems daunting, you may need to do a verbal query. Help the provider come to an educated decision. If you would like a downloadable CDI tip on this topic, go to my website, www.icd10md.com, and navigate to Free Pointers for a CDI tip.
Better yet, let’s all get vaccinated, eradicate this ghastly virus, and not have to query anyone about COVID-19 ever again!
Programming Note: Listen to Dr. Erica Remer when she co-hosts Talk Ten Tuesdays with Chuck Buck, Tuesdays at 10 a.m. Eastern.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has released a report on the Acute Hospital Care at Home (AHCAH) initiative, a program allowing select
Today I am going to focus on a new ICD-10-CM code, as of Oct. 1: Z51.A, Encounter for sepsis aftercare. We think about sepsis mortality
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.
Optimize your outpatient clinical documentation and gain comprehensive knowledge from foundational practices to advanced technologies, ensuring improved patient care and organizational and financial success. This webcast bundle provides a holistic approach to outpatient CDI, empowering you to implement best practices from the ground up and leverage advanced strategies for superior results. You will gain actionable insights to improve documentation quality, patient care, compliance, and financial outcomes.
Enhancing outpatient clinical documentation is crucial for maintaining accuracy, compliance, and proper reimbursement in today’s complex healthcare environment. This webcast, presented by industry expert Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, will provide you with actionable strategies to tackle complex challenges in outpatient documentation. You’ll learn how to craft detailed clinical narratives, utilize advanced EHR features, and implement accurate risk adjustment and HCC coding. The session also covers essential regulatory updates to keep your documentation practices compliant. Join us to gain the tools you need to improve documentation quality, support better patient care, and ensure financial integrity.
This webcast, presented by Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, a recognized expert with over 30 years of experience, offers essential strategies to improve outpatient clinical documentation integrity. You will learn how to enhance the accuracy and completeness of patient records by adopting best practices in coding and incorporating Social Determinants of Health (SDOH). The session also highlights the role of technology, such as EHRs and CDI software, in improving documentation quality. By attending, you will gain practical insights into ensuring precise and compliant documentation, supporting patient care, and optimizing reimbursement. This webcast is crucial for those looking to address documentation gaps and elevate their coding practices.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Healthcare organizations face complex regulatory requirements under the No Surprises Act and Price Transparency rules. These policies mandate extensive fee disclosures across settings, and confusion is widespread—many hospitals remain unaware they must post every contracted rate. Non-compliance could lead to costly penalties, financial loss, and legal risks. Join David M. Glaser Esq. as he shows you how to navigate these regulations effectively.
Protect your facility from unwanted audits! Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, and take a deep dive into both the CMS and AMA guidelines for reporting post operative pain blocks. You’ll learn how to determine if the nerve block is separately codable with real life examples for better understanding. Becky will also cover how to evaluate whether documentation supports medical necessity, offer recommendations for stronger documentation practices, and provide guidance on educating providers about documentation requirements. She’ll include a discussion of appropriate modifier and diagnosis coding assignment so that you can be confident that your billing of post operative pain blocks is fully supported and compliant.
During this RACmonitor webcast Dr. Ronald Hirsch spotlights the areas of the OIG’s Work Plan and the findings of their most recent audits that impact utilization review, case management, and audit staff. He also provides his common-sense interpretation of the prevailing regulations related to those target issues. You’ll walk away better equipped with strategies to put in place immediately to reduce your risk of paybacks, increased scrutiny, and criminal penalties.
Copyright © 2024 ICD10monitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
👻Spooky Sale is Back!👻 Get 31% off all three Medlearn brands, using code SPOOKY24.
