Denials have been on my mind for the last few weeks – specifically, how do we prevent them?
According to the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), 48.3 million claims were denied in 2021, which was 16.6 percent of all claims. If you use the standard of $25 per claim as the benchmark, then the total cost for reworking the denials was over $1.2 billion.
As coders, how can we affect claim denials? My thought is…we need to use critical thinking skills.
What is critical thinking? According to mystudentvoices.com, critical thinking includes five steps: formulate your question, gather your information, apply the information, consider the implications, and explore other points of view.
In applying this process to coding, my initial question is this: what is wrong with this patient, and how many resources were used to treat them? The ICD-10-CM/PCS and/or CPT codes must paint the picture of severity of illness and resource consumption for each patient.
To gather the information, I will read and understand the clinical information in the chart. When I read through charts, I jot down the diagnoses and procedures that were documented.
Now, to apply the information, the codes are assigned. Are there any information gaps to assigning the codes? Is there conflicting information regarding the diagnoses or procedures?
The next step in the process is to consider the implications. Does the conflicting information impact the MS-DRG or APR-DRG assignment? Does missing information impact the code assignment? Would additional information provide a more specific code?
The last step is exploring the options. What is the likelihood that this case will be denied? One complication or comorbidity (CC) or major CC (MCC) increases the likelihood of denial. Conflicting or missing information also increases the denial rate.
Let’s walk through an example of following these critical thinking points:
A patient presents to the emergency department after a fall. He has some confusion as well as a hip fracture, which is repaired later in the stay. The neurological assessment is alert on most days, but a few days he is documented as confused. The laboratory values show that the patient is dehydrated. The provider documents in several progress notes that the 79-year-old patient has dementia and toxic metabolic encephalopathy. The discharge summary does not include the diagnosis of toxic metabolic encephalopathy.
In applying our critical thinking model, I know that this patient had a hip fracture and surgery. He also had some confusion. As I read through the chart, I noticed that the documentation is conflicting regarding the patient’s confusion. As I assign the codes, I have an issue with toxic metabolic encephalopathy, because it is not carried through discharge. This case has a high likelihood of being denied, because it is the only MCC on the chart and it increases reimbursement. It requires a physician query to close the loose ends.
As coders, we use critical thinking skills daily, and on every chart. By using this skill, we avoid reimbursement loss, delay, and the extra work required to respond to a denial. In some cases, the extra time spent resolving conflicting information will avoid the denial.
Make sure to use your critical thinking skills when coding charts!
Programming note: Listen to Laurie Johnson’s live coding reports every Tuesday on Talk Ten Tuesdays, 10 a.m., with Chuck Buck and Dr. Erica Remer.
EDITOR’S NOTE: The narrative in this article reflects the firsthand perspectives and professional experience of Tami McMasters Gomez, curated and prepared for publication by Penny
This week I thought I would revisit the concept of what provider documentation is. It is becoming increasingly difficult for clinical documentation integrity (CDI) and
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
