If this hospital was targeted by the DOJ, where does that leave everyone else?
Today I have a great mystery to present. Last week the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a $1.88 million False Claims Act settlement with Genesis Medical Center in Davenport, Iowa. In the settlement, the DOJ noted that Genesis “retained Medicare overpayments for inpatient admissions which should have been billed at a lower rate as outpatient or observation services for the period between 2013 and 2016.”
We all know False Claims Act settlements are not uncommon; in fact, on Friday the DOJ announced a $3.2 million settlement with an orthopedic and anesthesia group that was alleged to have conspired to perform surgeries at a surgery center instead of the physician’s office and an $11.5 million settlement with a radiation therapy company which is accused of paying illegal inducements to drive volume.
But what makes the Genesis case stand out is that unlike the other two false claims cases, this case was not initiated by a whistleblower. In fact, there was no indication of what initiated the DOJ investigation, and a spokesperson for the US attorney’s office specifically noted that it was not a whistleblower who initiated the case.
So why did the DOJ go after Genesis Medical Center? My next stop was Google, where I noted another settlement for Genesis for over $53 million, but quickly realized this was a different Genesis; that Genesis was a company that owns and operates nursing facilities and it is clear that they were under investigation for doing a lot of non-compliant things, to have to pay a $53 million settlement.
Then I noted that Genesis Medical Center was in fact audited by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) in 2014 for services provided in 2010 and 2011. Now I was onto something. Genesis must have done really poorly on this audit, so naturally the OIG opened a False Claims Act case.
Well, lo and behold, Genesis did have its inpatient admissions audited. In fact, the OIG must have been concerned, because they audited 283 charts. And how many were determined to be billed improperly? Two. Yes—two out of 283 were improper. In fact, Genesis did well in almost every area audited and they even admitted guilt with every error the OIG found.
So it remains a great mystery as to why Genesis Medical Center was investigated when there was no whistleblower and a recent audit’s results were much, much better than most hospitals’. And it worries me. This 300-bed hospital had an error rate well under 1 percent, and when I look back at other OIG audits of inpatient admissions, I found much larger hospitals with inpatient admission error rates from 25 percent to almost 50 percent.
Until we figure this out, every hospital should ensure its processes to determine patient status are compliant and followed to the letter, because we have no idea how they are picking their targets and who is going to be next.
Program Note
Listen to Dr. Hirsch on Monitor Monday, every Monday, 10-10:30 a.m. EST
Clinical documentation integrity (CDI) professionals and inpatient coders understand the relationship between the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) and hospital reimbursement. However, they may be
Data has become one of the most powerful assets in healthcare, but its value is realized only when leaders possess the literacy to interpret, question,
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
