The number of conditions a patient has is now going to factor into the risk adjustment score (RAS).
EDITOR’S NOTE: Dr. Erica Remer reported this story live during the January 21 edition of Talk Ten Tuesdays. The following is an edited transcript of her reporting.
In March, I make my annual pilgrimage to Columbus, Ohio to speak at the Ohio Health Information Management Association (OHIMA) conference, and this year, my remarks are titled, “The HCC Model: Risk Adjustment isn’t just for Inpatients.” You can catch it early if you join me on Jan. 29 on my webinar for ICDUniversity on Wednesday (or on-demand).
In preparation, I scrutinized the 2020 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCC) model. I thought I would share some general pointers with our audience. Interestingly, many of the basic concepts are just as important in the inpatient DRG risk-adjustment model.
The first point is that the number of conditions a patient has is now going to factor into the risk adjustment score (RAS). The RAS will now include the following;
A pervasive issue noted in the HCC model is the use of a “history of,” a key coding-clinical disconnect. To coders, this phrase means “old,” “resolved,” or “no longer active,” and it often leads to a Z code, which is not risk-adjusting. The clinician may really mean to indicate a chronic or controlled condition that is part of the patient’s medical history.
This may mean the difference between an HCC condition, like chronic pulmonary embolism, with an RAF of 0.383, versus a non-HCC condition, like Z86.711, Personal history of pulmonary embolism. Does “history of lung cancer” mean that the patient has lung cancer that is currently being treated or is not treatable, for a risk adjustment of 1.024? Or does it mean Z85.118, Personal history of other malignant neoplasms of bronchus and lung, which provides no risk adjustment?
The next concept is to designate conditions as being “in remission.” These are conditions that might fall off the provider’s radar if they no longer constitute active medical problems. Conditions like acute leukemia, severe substance use disorder (otherwise known as dependence), or depression, specified as “in remission,” are still housed in the respective HCCs, and reap the associated risk adjustment.
Speaking of which, if your provider documents “depression” without specificity of “recurrent” or “in remission,” and without detailing the severity of the depression, the code assigned is F32.9, Major depressive disorder, single episode, unspecified. This is neither a CC inpatient nor is it included in HCC 59 for the RAF of 0.309.
Linkage is critical to landing in the right HCC. If your provider documents right ankle ulcer on today’s visit, and atherosclerosis two visits ago, the dots can’t be connected to yield atherosclerosis of the extremity with ulceration, even if the coder would compliantly be permitted to do so, per the ICD-10-CM guideline “with” convention, had the diagnoses appeared conjointly in the same encounter. This could mean the difference between an RAF of 1.488 and 0.515.
Medical conditions this year predict expenditures for the following year in the prospective CMS-HCC model, and the slate is wiped clean on Jan. 1. An acute injury or illness counts only for the next year, but chronic conditions remain part of the patient’s risk adjustment for as long as they persist.
Therefore, the problem list must be curated and edited to reflect the accurate capture of the patient’s conditions. If the problem resolves, it should be removed, or it should be relegated to a “personal history of” condition. If it persists, the condition may become a chronic condition, like chronic hepatitis or pancreatitis. An initial encounter may morph into a subsequent or sequela encounter and may land in a different HCC, like head injuries.
Your best bet is to spend some quality time scouring the HCC list as I did. You just may recognize conditions that will make a difference to your clinician, their quality metrics, and their bottom line.
Programming Note:
Listen to Dr. Erica Remer every Tuesday on Talk Ten Tuesdays, 10-10:30 a.m. EST.
The recent settlement between Kaiser Permanente and the federal government marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over risk-adjustment practices in Medicare Advantage (MA)
EDITOR’S NOTE: Gloryanne Bryant has more than 40 years of experience in her field and is an independent HIM Coding and CDI Consultant who works
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
