Appeals court rules HHS has the authority to reduce payments.

In November of last year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) decided to move forward with a two-year phase-in of site-neutral payments, despite a decision in court earlier in the year siding with hospitals in their fight to keep higher outpatient payments for off-campus facilities.

Under the 2019 Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) Final Rule, CMS made payments for clinic visits site-neutral by reducing the payment rate for evaluation and management (E&M) services provided at off-campus, provider-based departments by 60 percent.

The American Hospital Association (AHA), the Association of American Medical Colleges, and dozens of individual hospitals across the nation sued the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

However, upon appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals in the District of Columbia stated that HHS had the authority to reduce payments to the off-campus facilities to bring them in line with other outpatient payments.

The court held that HHS’s reduction in reimbursement for E&M services provided by off-campus, provider-based departments fell within its authority to develop a method to “control unnecessary increase in the volume of outpatient services.”

Why does this decision matter?
The court’s decision reduces hospitals’ revenue in a time that they are bleeding red ink during a pandemic.

According to HHS estimates, it could reduce hospital revenues by $880 million in 2020.

In an open call to CMS, Bruce Siegel, president and CEO of America’s Essential Hospitals, said that “allowing the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to maintain its policy of deep cuts to payments for outpatient care will widen gaps in healthcare access in communities across the country. We call on Congress and the administration to reverse course on this terrible site-neutral payment policy and restore access to care for all people.”

However, as I reported in my ICD10monitor article in August, “Do Hospitals Have a Target on their Backs?”, the opinion by Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan noted that “…without site neutrality, off-campus outpatient departments can get paid up to 114 percent more than freestanding physician offices.”

This HHS ruling is an attempt to continue to combat continued rising healthcare costs, according to HHS Secretary Alex Azar. HHS in the 2019 OPPS rule reduced E&M visit payments for off-campus departments to be in line with freestanding offices, and thus site-neutral. That is when the AHA sued the department. The court’s opinion was that “the lower the reimbursement rate for a service, the less the incentive to provide it, all else being equal.”

HHS continued by noting that “if the service is already being provided for and accessible to patients, from independent physicians, why isn’t there equal or neutral payments?” That is where the hospitals lose their position in not being able to respond, beyond citing their “higher regulated” sites. The quality and access to care is still there for the patient.

AHA continues to urge Congress to reject calls for any additional site-neutral payment policies for hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs). Their position cites the pandemic, saying that Americans rely heavily on hospitals to provide 24/7 access to care for all types of patients, to serve as a safety-net provider for vulnerable populations, and to make available the resources needed to respond to disasters.

However, with the implementation of telehealth, access has expanded for these populations, and HHS believes that the payment paradigm should be equal or neutral across the board. The courts agree at this time.

Keep an eye on this story in the coming months, as there could be a shift in rulings after the Nov. 3 election on all CMS- and HHS-funded payments.

Programming Note: Terry Fletcher is a member of the ICD10monitor editorial board. Listen to her live reporting on this subject today on Talk Ten Tuesdays, 10 a.m. EST.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Terry A. Fletcher BS, CPC, CCC, CEMC, CCS, CCS-P, CMC, CMSCS, ACS-CA, SCP-CA, QMGC, QMCRC, QMPM

Terry Fletcher, BS, CPC, CCC, CEMC, CCS, CCS-P, CMC, CMSCS, CMCS, ACS-CA, SCP-CA, QMGC, QMCRC, is a healthcare coding consultant, educator, and auditor with more than 30 years of experience. Terry is a past member of the national advisory board for AAPC, past chair of the AAPCCA, and an AAPC national and regional conference educator. Terry is the author of several coding and reimbursement publications, as well as a practice auditor for multiple specialty practices around the country. Her coding and reimbursement specialties include cardiology, peripheral cardiology, gastroenterology, E&M auditing, orthopedics, general surgery, neurology, interventional radiology, and telehealth/telemedicine. Terry is a member of the ICD10monitor editorial board and a popular panelist on Talk Ten Tuesdays.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 19, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24