Readers are advised to monitor regularly the OIG Work Plan.

Even the most seasoned healthcare professionals and coders can get blindsided when they see a headline or a news alert and think, “wait, that can’t be correct…can it?”

Which is what happened to me as I monitored the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services-Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG) workplan announcements daily, just to see what and who are the latest targets of oversight.

Late in April, I had a client come to me and say, have you seen the latest OIG alert for dermatologists? So I went to review my alerts, and sure enough, it was there:

April 2021

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

Dermatologist Claims for Evaluation and Management Services on the Same Day as Minor Surgical Procedures

Office of Audit Services

W-00-21-35868

2021

This didn’t make sense to me, because as a rule, most dermatologists and general practice physicians see patients for skin lesions and removals on the same date as an evaluation and management (E&M) service. It’s not necessarily routine, as we know that it is hard to support medical necessity, but if a new patient comes in for an encounter for a complaint about a suspicious skin lesion, mark, or growth, the physician does a complete work-up, and in doing so, he or she finds a few additional lesions or skin tags that need removal, that service will be provided on the same date as the new patient office visit.

Also, patients that are known to the provider and have a history of skin cancer will be scheduled for periodic reassessments to monitor any new malignancies, and if found, may have them excised or a “destruction of tissue” procedure performed on the same date as the E&M established patient visit. The majority of these procedures are not “planned.” They are performed after the provider performs a medically necessary evaluation to determine the need for a minor procedure.

Well, after this alert came out, I went back to the General Correct Coding Policies for National Correct Coding Initiative’s (CCI’s) Policy Manual for Medicare Services, Chapter 1, pages 16-17, where it states:

“If a procedure has a global period of 090 days, it is defined as a major surgical procedure. If an E&M service is performed on the same date of service as a major surgical procedure for the purpose of deciding whether to perform this surgical procedure, the E&M service is separately reportable with modifier 57. Other preoperative E&M services on the same date of service as a major surgical procedure are included in the global payment for Revision Date (Medicare): 1/1/2021 I-17 the procedure, and are not separately reportable. NCCI does not contain edits based on this rule because MACs have separate edits. If a procedure has a global period of 000 or 010 days, it is defined as a minor surgical procedure. In general, E&M services performed on the same date of service as a minor surgical procedure are included in the payment for the procedure. The decision to perform a minor surgical procedure is included in the payment for the minor surgical procedure and shall not be reported separately as an E&M service. However, a significant and separately identifiable E&M service unrelated to the decision to perform the minor surgical procedure is separately reportable with modifier 25. The E&M service and minor surgical procedure do not require different diagnoses. If a minor surgical procedure is performed on a new patient, the same rules for reporting E&M services apply. The fact that the patient is ‘new’ to the provider is not sufficient alone to justify reporting an E&M service on the same date of service as a minor surgical procedure. The NCCI program contains many, but not all, possible edits based on these principles.”

I had to read this at least three times to understand why Medicare would even have this policy, as it does not make sense to me. Think about this. In the underlined sections above, it says, “the decision to perform the minor procedure is included in the payment for the minor procedure and an E&M service cannot be performed separately.” How does this make sense if the physician could not make that decision prior to evaluating the patient? The relative value unit (RVU) for the minor surgical skin procedures are not inflated in payment to possibly include an E&M value, from what I can see.

If your provider performed a 17000, destruction of a premalignant lesion, on a patient after an exam found this lesion, this Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) rule says the physician is only entitled to $67.34, with a work RVU of 0.61. If your physician only billed for an office visit Level 3 E&M service, 99203, they would have received $113.75, with a work RVU of 1.60. However, this CCI direction states that this could not be billed at the same encounter if the E&M is for the decision on the minor procedure.

What is interesting is that there is a target on the backs of dermatologists and their services.

The OIG Work Plan states:

“Medicare covers an evaluation and management (E&M) service when the service is reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury, or to improve the functioning of a malformed body member. Generally, Medicare payments for global surgery procedures include payments for necessary preoperative and postoperative services related to surgery when furnished by a surgeon. Medicare global surgery rules define the rules for reporting E&M services with minor surgery and other procedures covered by these rules. In general, E&M services provided on the same day of service as a minor surgical procedure are included in the payment for the procedure. The decision to perform a minor surgical procedure is included in the payment for a minor surgical procedure and must not be reported separately as an E&M service. An E&M service should be billed only on the same day if a surgeon performs a significant and separately identifiable E&M service that is unrelated to the decision to perform a minor surgical procedure. In this instance, the provider should append a modifier 25 to the appropriate E&M code. In 2019, about 56 percent of dermatologists’ claims with an E&M service also included minor surgical procedures (such as lesion removals, destructions, and biopsies) on the same day. This may indicate abuse whereby the provider used modifier 25 to bill Medicare for a significant and separately identifiable E&M service when only a minor surgical procedure and related preoperative and postoperative services are supported by the beneficiary’s medical record. We will determine whether dermatologists’ claims for E&M services on the same day of service as a minor surgical procedure complied with Medicare requirements.”

What makes me feel concern for dermatology practices is that the last sentence of the OIG alert is vague: “we will determine…” Are they medical professionals making that determination of medical necessity for the E&M service? What if other diagnoses were addressed during the E&M encounter, but the primary diagnosis submitted was for the skin procedure?

Taking this a step further, minor procedures, as described by the CCI policy manual, are 0-010-day global procedures. So, who’s next? Gastroenterologists giving colonoscopies on the same date as an E&M? General surgeons performing an incisional breast biopsy on the same date as an E&M? Or how about a radiologist who needs to have a counseling visit prior to a patient undergoing chemotherapy – again, is this related to the minor procedure?

I would encourage HHS-OIG to be more specific in their Work Plan items so that practices can be prepared – and I would encourage providers to make sure they are ready for any scrutiny that may come for medically necessary services they provided in good faith, if they wind up being questioned due to a policy that does not make a lot of sense.

Programming Note: Listen to Terry Fletcher report this story live today during Talk Ten Tuesdays, 10 Eastern.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Terry A. Fletcher BS, CPC, CCC, CEMC, CCS, CCS-P, CMC, CMSCS, ACS-CA, SCP-CA, QMGC, QMCRC, QMPM

Terry Fletcher, BS, CPC, CCC, CEMC, CCS, CCS-P, CMC, CMSCS, CMCS, ACS-CA, SCP-CA, QMGC, QMCRC, is a healthcare coding consultant, educator, and auditor with more than 30 years of experience. Terry is a past member of the national advisory board for AAPC, past chair of the AAPCCA, and an AAPC national and regional conference educator. Terry is the author of several coding and reimbursement publications, as well as a practice auditor for multiple specialty practices around the country. Her coding and reimbursement specialties include cardiology, peripheral cardiology, gastroenterology, E&M auditing, orthopedics, general surgery, neurology, interventional radiology, and telehealth/telemedicine. Terry is a member of the ICD10monitor editorial board and a popular panelist on Talk Ten Tuesdays.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

I050825

Mastering ICD-10-CM Coding for Diabetes and it’s Complications: Avoiding Denials & Ensuring Compliance

Struggling with ICD-10-CM coding for diabetes and complications? This expert-led webcast clarifies complex combination codes, documentation gaps, and sequencing rules to reduce denials and ensure compliance. Dr. Angela Comfort will provide actionable strategies to accurately link diabetes to complications, improve provider documentation, and optimize reimbursement—helping coders, CDI specialists, and HIM leaders minimize audit risks and strengthen revenue integrity. Don’t miss this chance to master diabetes coding with real-world case studies, key takeaways, and live Q&A!

May 8, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Navigating the 3-Day & 1-Day Payment Window: Compliance, Billing, and Revenue Protection

Navigating the 3-Day & 1-Day Payment Window: Compliance, Billing, and Revenue Protection

Struggling with CMS’s 3-Day Payment Window? Join compliance expert Michael G. Calahan, PA, MBA, CCO, to master billing restrictions for pre-admission and inter-facility services. Learn how to avoid audit risks, optimize revenue cycle workflows, and ensure compliance across departments. Critical for C-suite leaders, providers, coders, revenue cycle teams, and compliance teams—this webcast delivers actionable strategies to protect reimbursements and meet federal regulations.

May 15, 2025
Audit-Proof Your Wound Care Procedures: Expert Insights on Compliance and Risk Mitigation

Audit-Proof Your Wound Care Procedures: Expert Insights on Compliance and Risk Mitigation

Providers face increasing Medicare audits when using skin substitute grafts, leaving many unprepared for claim denials and financial liabilities. Join veteran healthcare attorney Andrew B. Wachler, Esq., in this essential webcast and master the Medicare audit process, learn best practices for compliant billing and documentation, and mitigate fraud and abuse risks. With actionable insights and a live Q&A session, you’ll gain the tools to defend your practice and ensure compliance in this rapidly evolving landscape.

April 17, 2025
Utilization Review Essentials: What Every Professional Needs to Know About Medicare

Utilization Review Essentials: What Every Professional Needs to Know About Medicare

Dr. Ronald Hirsch dives into the basics of Medicare for clinicians to be successful as utilization review professionals. He’ll break down what Medicare does and doesn’t pay for, what services it provides and how hospitals get paid for providing those services – including both inpatient and outpatient. Learn how claims are prepared and how much patients must pay for their care. By attending our webcast, you will gain a new understanding of these issues and be better equipped to talk to patients, to their medical staff, and to their administrative team.

March 20, 2025

Rethinking Observation Metrics: Standardizing Data for Better Outcomes

Hospitals face growing challenges in measuring observation metrics due to inconsistencies in classification, payer policies, and benchmarking practices. Join Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, and Anuja Mohla, DO, FACP, MBA, ACPA-C, CHCQM-PHYADV as they provide critical insights into refining observation metrics. This webcast will address key issues affecting observation data integrity and offer strategies for improving consistency in reporting. You will learn how to define meaningful metrics, clarify commonly misinterpreted terms, and apply best practices for benchmarking, and gain actionable strategies to enhance observation data reliability, mitigate financial risk, and drive better decision-making.

February 25, 2025

Trending News

Celebrate Lab Week with MedLearn! Sign up to win one year of our Laboratory All Access Pass! Click here to learn more →

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24