Hematogenous Means Bloodborne, not that the Prosthetic Joint isn’t Infected

A prosthetic joint is a foreign body, and its presence alone is a significant risk factor for infection.

I am changing gears today, and I am sure you are ready for a clinical discussion. As I near retirement age, I have been thinking to myself, “what I can leave you all when I go?” As a result, I am writing a book on all things ICD-10, clinical documentation integrity (CDI), and quality. I am organizing it from A to Z, and last weekend, I was working on complication of devices.

I ran across an American Hospital Association (AHA) Coding Clinic question that I must not have noticed when it came out in 2019 (Quarter 3), or I would have registered my dissatisfaction then. The question centers on a patient who has a left knee replacement and develops a dental infection after a wisdom tooth extraction. He is subsequently diagnosed with a hematogenous left knee prosthetic joint infection and requires revision of the arthroplasty and synovectomy. The question asked was: “does the term ‘hematogenous’ mean the prosthetic joint infection is due to the presence of the prosthesis, or instead is seeded from concurrent infection elsewhere?” They want to know if they should use T84.54XA, Infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal left knee prosthesis, initial encounter.

I strongly disagree with their answer. They respond that the infection of the knee is not due to the prosthetic joint, but occurred secondary to another source. They explain that “hematogenous” means the infection originated in the blood and spread by way of the bloodstream, and the advice is to use M00.862, Arthritis due to other bacteria, L knee, and the status code Z96.652, Presence of L artificial knee joint.

This advice is flawed in multiple ways. “Hematogenous” doesn’t mean it originated in the blood, although it does mean “spread by way of the bloodstream from a distant source during bacteremia.” If the incision site had become infected and spread to the joint, that would be referred to as “contiguous spread.” The prosthesis can also get inoculated at the time of implantation. But organisms don’t arise spontaneously; they come from somewhere, and then they attack a body part, resulting in an infection.

A prosthetic joint is a foreign body, and its presence alone is a significant risk factor for infection. It takes a smaller inoculum of germs to establish an infection, as compared to a native joint, and a prosthesis can promote formation of a biofilm that can impact the efficacy of antibiotics. The incidence of prosthetic joint infection is 1-5 percent, and it is divided into early (within the first four weeks after implantation), delayed (from three months to one year later), and late infection (over one year later), and is usually hematogenous. The microbes vary, depending on the time frame.

The T84.5- series is titled Infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal joint prosthesis. Inflammatory reaction may be literally “due to” the prosthesis, but infection is “due to” a microorganism. Whether the germs that started the infection were implanted with the prosthesis, spread from the skin to the joint, or traveled in the bloodstream from a far-off site is not relevant to the story. The prosthesis is infected, and that must be detailed here. Even advising use of V79.2, Prosthetic and other implants, materials and accessory orthopedic devices associated with adverse events, would have at least created some linkage.

“Arthritis” of a native joint might be able to be treated with antibiotics. An infected implant, regardless of where the germs originated, usually requires more extensive treatment, often necessitating explantation. The example presented to Coding Clinic did require surgical intervention.

In my opinion, the correct coding for this scenario was: T84.54XA, Infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal left knee prosthesis, K34.7, Periapical abscess without sinus, and a B95-B96 code, if determinable.

Maybe the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) should change the title to “Infection and inflammatory reaction involving (due to) prosthesis,” to alleviate confusion. As it stands, the Coding Clinic advice does not tell the story, and they should revise it.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Erica Remer, MD, FACEP, CCDS, ACPA-C

Erica Remer, MD, FACEP, CCDS, ACPA-C has a unique perspective as a practicing emergency physician for 25 years, with extensive coding, CDI, and ICD-10 expertise. As physician advisor for University Hospitals Health System in Cleveland, Ohio for four years, she trained 2,700 providers in ICD-10, closed hundreds of queries, fought numerous DRG clinical determination and medical necessity denials, and educated CDI specialists and healthcare providers with engaging, case-based presentations. She transitioned to independent consulting in July 2016. Dr. Remer is a member of the ICD10monitor editorial board and is the co-host on the popular Talk Ten Tuesdays weekly, live Internet radio broadcasts.

Related Stories

Defining High-Quality Documentation

Defining High-Quality Documentation

Last week I wrote about the importance of defining what clinical documentation is, within the scope of clinical documentation integrity (CDI) reviews. This week, I’ll

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

The Cost of Ignoring Risk Adjustment: How HCCs Impact Revenue & Compliance

The Cost of Ignoring Risk Adjustment: How HCCs Impact Revenue & Compliance

Stop revenue leakage and boost hospital performance by mastering risk adjustment and HCCs. This essential webcast with expert Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, will reveal how inaccurate patient acuity documentation leads to lost reimbursements through penalties from poor quality scores. Learn the critical differences between HCCs and traditional CCs/MCCs, adapt your CDI workflows, and ensure accurate payments in Medicare Advantage and value-based care models. Perfect for HIM leaders, coders, and CDI professionals.  Don’t miss this chance to protect your hospital’s revenue and reputation!

May 29, 2025
I050825

Mastering ICD-10-CM Coding for Diabetes and it’s Complications: Avoiding Denials & Ensuring Compliance

Struggling with ICD-10-CM coding for diabetes and complications? This expert-led webcast clarifies complex combination codes, documentation gaps, and sequencing rules to reduce denials and ensure compliance. Dr. Angela Comfort will provide actionable strategies to accurately link diabetes to complications, improve provider documentation, and optimize reimbursement—helping coders, CDI specialists, and HIM leaders minimize audit risks and strengthen revenue integrity. Don’t miss this chance to master diabetes coding with real-world case studies, key takeaways, and live Q&A!

May 8, 2025
2025 Coding Clinic Webcast Series

2025 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update Webcast Series

Uncover critical guidance. HIM coding expert, Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, provides an interactive review on important information in each of the AHA’s 2025 ICD-10-CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics in easy-to-access on-demand webcasts, available shortly after each official publication.

April 14, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.

June 19, 2025
Open Door Forum Webcast Series

Open Door Forum Webcast Series

Bring your questions and join the conversation during this open forum series, live every Wednesday at 10 a.m. EST from June 11–July 30. Hosted by Chuck Buck, these fast-paced 30-minute sessions connect you directly with top healthcare experts tackling today’s most urgent compliance and policy issues.

June 11, 2025
Open Door Forum: The Changing Face of Addiction: Coding, Compliance & Care

Open Door Forum: The Changing Face of Addiction: Coding, Compliance & Care

Substance abuse is everywhere. It’s a complicated diagnosis with wide-ranging implications well beyond acute care. The face of addiction continues to change so it’s important to remember not just the addict but the spectrum of extended victims and the other social determinants and legal ramifications. Join John K. Hall, MD, JD, MBA, FCLM, FRCPC, for a critical Q&A on navigating substance abuse in 2025.  Register today and be a part of the conversation!

July 16, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24