Health Plan Policy Errs About CMS Two-Midnight Rule

Contrary to the belief of some, the rule remains alive and well.

EDITOR’S NOTE: The rumor mill was churning recently regarding news from a Wisconsin health plan that reportedly was discontinuing adherence to the contentious two-midnight rule of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), believing that CMS was, too.

Sometimes, a simple question can open a door to what feels like The Twilight Zone. This happened to me late last week when I received an update from my health system’s contracting office. 

Earlier in the week, I had asked my contact in the office to investigate if any of our contracted managed Medicare plans had updated policies supporting use of the two-midnight rule. It wasn’t likely, but I figured we might as well make sure nothing had come up recently. While plans regularly send us policy updates, they are often convoluted, and it can be difficult to recognize important changes. 

Her reply a couple of days later indicated that some plans had replied that no, they were not following the Medicare two-midnight rule. Others she was still waiting to hear back from, but one in particular, Security Health Plan, responded with a link from their administrative manual

Their policy, titled “Two Midnight Rule,” which was “last updated on January 24, 2019,” made my jaw drop at the first sentence:

“In line with the recent Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services suspension of the two-midnight rule, effective immediately, Security Health Plan will also suspend implementation of this rule.”

What’s that, now? For a brief moment, I thought perhaps I was not the well-informed physician advisor I thought I was. Quickly, I dismissed that thought, deciding that there was no way I could have missed such a major development as CMS’s abandoning the two-midnight rule. What the heck was going on? 

I called the 800 number listed in the policy to address questions, and eventually, I was connected with the individual who originally sent the link in response to my contracting office’s question. “CMS never suspended the two-midnight rule,” I said. “What’s this policy about?” 

While the individual on the other line was unable to answer my questions, I was told someone else would call me back to discuss.

While waiting, I looked around the plan’s website and learned a bit about the payor. Originally founded in 1971 as the Greater Marshfield Community Health Plan, in 1986 it evolved into Security Health Plan, and it is now part of the Marshfield Clinic Health System in Wisconsin. They describe themselves as “a not-for-profit health maintenance organization” offering “a variety of health-insurance options for employer groups and individuals and families of all ages and income levels.”

I called back after the weekend passed and asked when I might be able to speak to someone who had knowledge about the creation of the policy. I was told that someone would call me back later in the day if they could, but I ended up getting another call from my original contact. 

Unfortunately, the policy folks didn’t have time to discuss the situation, but they wanted to pass along the message that “CMS was going back and forth about continuing the two-midnight rule, and we at Security Health Plan decided we would not follow (it).” I responded that this was not the case; CMS had never recently indicated it was considering abandoning the two-midnight rule. This was met with assurance that my point would be passed along.

I’ve come away from this experience without any good answers. But I will close with noting that boy, this subject matter is challenging! And not just for patients, hospital administrators, case management staff, and providers. Clearly, even health insurance plans can become mixed up! Because in all honesty, I truly believe this policy was the result of an honest mistake. Someone, somewhere within the plan found a confounding and cryptic communication from CMS and misunderstood what they read. From there, decisions were made and posted as policy. 

I get it. We all get it. I just hope they make the adjustment online soon, so others don’t become similarly confused. 

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Juliet Ugarte Hopkins, MD, ACPA-C

Juliet B. Ugarte Hopkins, MD, ACPA-C is Medical Director of Phoenix Medical Management, Inc., Immediate Past President of the American College of Physician Advisors, and CEO of Velvet Hammer Physician Advising LLC. Dr. Ugarte Hopkins practiced as a pediatric hospitalist for a decade and then developed the physician advisor role for case management, utilization, and clinical documentation at a three-hospital health system where she worked for nearly another decade. She is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board, author, and national speaker.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

I050825

Mastering ICD-10-CM Coding for Diabetes and it’s Complications: Avoiding Denials & Ensuring Compliance

Struggling with ICD-10-CM coding for diabetes and complications? This expert-led webcast clarifies complex combination codes, documentation gaps, and sequencing rules to reduce denials and ensure compliance. Dr. Angela Comfort will provide actionable strategies to accurately link diabetes to complications, improve provider documentation, and optimize reimbursement—helping coders, CDI specialists, and HIM leaders minimize audit risks and strengthen revenue integrity. Don’t miss this chance to master diabetes coding with real-world case studies, key takeaways, and live Q&A!

May 8, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Navigating the 3-Day & 1-Day Payment Window: Compliance, Billing, and Revenue Protection

Navigating the 3-Day & 1-Day Payment Window: Compliance, Billing, and Revenue Protection

Struggling with CMS’s 3-Day Payment Window? Join compliance expert Michael G. Calahan, PA, MBA, CCO, to master billing restrictions for pre-admission and inter-facility services. Learn how to avoid audit risks, optimize revenue cycle workflows, and ensure compliance across departments. Critical for C-suite leaders, providers, coders, revenue cycle teams, and compliance teams—this webcast delivers actionable strategies to protect reimbursements and meet federal regulations.

May 15, 2025
Audit-Proof Your Wound Care Procedures: Expert Insights on Compliance and Risk Mitigation

Audit-Proof Your Wound Care Procedures: Expert Insights on Compliance and Risk Mitigation

Providers face increasing Medicare audits when using skin substitute grafts, leaving many unprepared for claim denials and financial liabilities. Join veteran healthcare attorney Andrew B. Wachler, Esq., in this essential webcast and master the Medicare audit process, learn best practices for compliant billing and documentation, and mitigate fraud and abuse risks. With actionable insights and a live Q&A session, you’ll gain the tools to defend your practice and ensure compliance in this rapidly evolving landscape.

April 17, 2025
Utilization Review Essentials: What Every Professional Needs to Know About Medicare

Utilization Review Essentials: What Every Professional Needs to Know About Medicare

Dr. Ronald Hirsch dives into the basics of Medicare for clinicians to be successful as utilization review professionals. He’ll break down what Medicare does and doesn’t pay for, what services it provides and how hospitals get paid for providing those services – including both inpatient and outpatient. Learn how claims are prepared and how much patients must pay for their care. By attending our webcast, you will gain a new understanding of these issues and be better equipped to talk to patients, to their medical staff, and to their administrative team.

March 20, 2025

Rethinking Observation Metrics: Standardizing Data for Better Outcomes

Hospitals face growing challenges in measuring observation metrics due to inconsistencies in classification, payer policies, and benchmarking practices. Join Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, and Anuja Mohla, DO, FACP, MBA, ACPA-C, CHCQM-PHYADV as they provide critical insights into refining observation metrics. This webcast will address key issues affecting observation data integrity and offer strategies for improving consistency in reporting. You will learn how to define meaningful metrics, clarify commonly misinterpreted terms, and apply best practices for benchmarking, and gain actionable strategies to enhance observation data reliability, mitigate financial risk, and drive better decision-making.

February 25, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24