Correction:
Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs) have been a part of our coding, documentation, and reimbursement landscape since their implementation by Medicare in 2004. HCCs were initially put into place by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to provide accurate and timely capture of data, but also to track a patient’s care and condition over time.
The original goal of HCCs was to ensure that money could be earmarked to cover a patient’s future medical needs. This model has been the basis for CMS to reimburse Medicare Advantage (MA) plans (Medicare Part C) based on the health of its members.
Today, HCCs as a risk adjustment model is undergoing more scrutiny, since risk adjustment factor scores impact annual capitation rates for the MA plans. Now, for HCC to be successful, the provider must report all diagnoses that impact the patient’s evaluation, care, and treatment, including coexisting conditions, chronic conditions, and treatments rendered on an annual basis.
These life-altering chronic conditions seem to be the most challenging when it comes to proper HCC documentation and maximizing reimbursement for physicians and hospitals. This article provides an in-depth overview of HCCs for health information management (HIM) leaders and coding professionals.
Top 10 Chronic Conditions
The top 10 chronic and life-altering HCC groups are the following:
Since the implementation of ICD-10, coding HCCs for these chronic health conditions has become more challenging due to the use of combination codes for conditions, common symptoms, and manifestations.
A single combination code may be used to classify two diagnoses, a diagnosis with an associated sign or symptom, or a diagnosis with an associated complication. Disease interactions definitely impact reimbursement. For correct coding in ICD-9, manifestation and etiology codes were required in the proper sequence. Today, combination codes allow the use of only one code, resulting in fewer cases with multiple codes and a reduction in sequencing problems.
The challenge for coders is getting physicians to thoroughly report on each patient’s risk adjustment diagnosis based on clinical medical record documentation from a face-to-face encounter. Certain documentation in the medical record must be present for a condition to be reported on a claim. The lack of this documentation directly affects the reimbursement level for an HCC claim.
Diseases and conditions are organized into body systems or similar disease processes. The top HCC categories include:
Patients are often assigned more than one HCC because the combination of demographic information and risk factors can accrue to denote more than one kind of illness or prospective illness. This presents unique challenges for coding teams.
When Multiple HCCs Arise
The CMS model allows for multiple HCCs per patient. Some categories override others within a hierarchy of categories. About one-third of the HCCs are in hierarchies that ensure a patient is coded for only the most severe manifestation among related diseases.
Using diabetes mellitus (DM) as an example, DM combination codes (example: E11.21) include the type of diabetes (Type 2), the body system affected (kidney), and the complications affecting that body system (nephropathy). Diabetes also occurs in multiple HCCs based on the type of complication:
These categories involve the use of numerous combination codes to accurately document the role of diabetes in the HCC. The financial portion provided by CMS for the annual care of a diabetic patient is greatly impacted by the accuracy of both ICD-10 combination codes and HCC coding. Considering the fact that 29.1 million people (or 9.3 percent of the U.S. population) had diabetes in 2012, our nation’s budget for this population’s annual care is strongly impacted if quality clinical documentation is not maintained.
Key Factors to Maximize Revenue Using the HCC Model
There are three important steps to take in order to maximize and protect revenue under HCCs.
Use linking language: Physicians must use “linking language” in their documentation (due to, related to, because of, etc.) if there are two different HCCs, such as congestive heart failure and diabetes. The proper linking language documenting the causal relationship for manifestation codes (diabetes and the associated CHF) will qualify for maximum reimbursement.
Conduct an annual risk adjustment assessment: It is imperative for physicians to document the HCCs in detail, on an annual basis. Be sure to assess the severity of the illness and risk of mortality for each patient annually to determine how much the MA plan will be reimbursed for the care of a patient. The year after a patient is diagnosed with diabetes – when services rendered include multiple trips to an endocrinologist, admissions due to foot ulcers, regular blood sugar testing, etc. – impacts revenue and is more influential than the year prior, when all you had were social and demographic factors.
Report chronic conditions: Again, this comes down to documentation. If critical information is not documented during each patient encounter with the chronically ill, a physician will lose revenue. If a lab test concludes that a diabetic patient’s sugar is high and the physician does not note this in the chart, the opportunity to increase revenue is lost, since the coder can only code from the physician’s documentation and not from the lab test.
The main goal of the HCC model is to promote better health management along with accurate reimbursement from MA plans. With 1.4 million Americans diagnosed with diabetes every year, the door remains open for increased reimbursement through clinical documentation improvement and coding specificity. The only way to receive proper reimbursement from CMS –and to improve your revenue cycle – is to provide timely and accurate HCC documentation.
EDITOR’S NOTE: The initial erroneously reported information regarding the current HCCs for Medicare Risk Adjustment. We regret the error.
As discussed in my prior articles, Medicare Advantage (MA) organization payments incorporate a beneficiary’s health risk, as determined by diagnoses that map to Centers for
As discussed last week, payments to Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are adjusted to account for expected healthcare resource consumption by enrollees. Higher risk scores increase
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Uncover essential coding insights with nationally recognized coding authority Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS. Through ICD10monitor’s interactive, on‑demand webcast series, Kay walks you through the AHA’s 2026 ICD‑10‑CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics, translating each update into practical, easy‑to‑apply guidance designed to sharpen precision, ensure compliance, and strengthen day‑to‑day decision‑making. Available shortly after each official release.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s third quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s second quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
