Today is Mardi Gras, which is French for “Fat Tuesday.” It is the last day before lent starts tomorrow, Ash Wednesday. This got me thinking of what medical diagnoses or conditions also have a French connection.
The first one we may think of is Guillain-Barre disease or syndrome. While most of us have heard of this, and as coders, many of us have coded this, it is a rare condition. Cleveland Clinic notes this autoimmune condition can happen at any age, but those between the ages of 30 and 50 are most affected.
In Guillain-Barre syndrome the patient’s immune system attacks their peripheral nerves. Initial symptoms may include numbness and tingling, but muscle weakness can progress to paralysis. Cleveland Clinic does go on to note that most people do fully recover from Guillian-Barre with treatment.
The American Academy of Neurology Journals notes the syndrome was named for French neurologists George Guillian and Jean-Alexandre Barre who identified this in soldiers in 1916. Another French physician, Andre Strohl, was a radiologist in World War I who contributed to reflex and nerve conduction studies, but his name was left off subsequent publications and the syndrome. We would assign G61.0 for Guillian-Barre syndrome.
Next French influence is Dupuytren’s Contracture. This genetic disorder is also known as the Viking’s disease. According to the National Library of Medicine, baron Guillaume Dupuytren identified the palmar fascia as the cause of this contraction in 1831 after dissecting the hand of a patient who died with this disorder. While it is thought other surgeons were aware of the etiology of the condition, the presentation by baron Guillaume Dupuytren was so brilliant that his name was linked to the disorder. M72.0 would be assigned for palmar fascial fibromatosis [Dupuytren].
We are familiar with Tourette’s syndrome, and it sounds French, but does it have that French connection? Oui it does! The Tourette Association of America gives a history of the syndrome. Georges Albert Édouard Brutus Gilles de la Tourette published an article about a condition he called “maladie des tics.” This article was published in 1885 when de la Tourette was 28 years old. Gilles de la Tourette studied under French neurologist Dr. Jean-Martin Charcot and it was Dr. Charcot who renamed the condition after Gilles de la Tourette. F95.2 would be assigned for Tourette’s syndrome or disorder.
Dr. Charcot is often thought to be the father of modern neurology – Sigmund Freud was also one of his students. If the name Charcot sounds familiar, there is good reason for that. Charcot arthropathy is named for him as is Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Charcot’s joint, or neuropathic arthropathy would be assigned as M14.6, with codes for specific sites, multiple sites, vertebrae and unspecified site. Charcot-Marie-Tooth is named for Dr. Charcot, French physician Dr. Pierre Marie as well as English physician Dr. Howard Henry Tooth. G60.0 would be assigned for that hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy or Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.
These are just a few of the diseases and disorders that have a French connection. Challenge your coding team with a similar type topic to research and report back on. It is a fun way to keep your team engaged and learn a little bit in the process.
André Strohl: Why Was his Name Omitted from Guillain-Barré Syndrome’s Eponym? (S22.003) | Neurology
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS): Symptoms & Treatment
[Dupuytren’s disease – the story of an eponym] – PubMed
An overview of the Charcot foot pathophysiology – PMC
This week Blue Cross Blue Shield published an article titled “Study suggests AI is boosting hospital billing.” The study was based on data analyzed by
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) operates a surveillance platform called the Fraud Prevention System (FPS) that analyzes Medicare claims across the full
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
