Insys founder found guilty of racketeering in connection with bribes to prescribe potent opioid spray.
On past Monitor Monday programs, we have reported on John Kapoor, the former CEO of opioid giant Insys Therapeutics Inc., who has been under indictment since October 2018 for alleged violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), which prohibits medical providers from paying or receiving kickbacks, remuneration, or anything of value in exchange for referrals of patients who will receive treatment paid for by government healthcare programs like Medicare and Medicaid.
The law, often referred to as AKS, is designed to keep medical treatment decisions free from the influence of potential monetary gain. Violations of AKS can also be violations of the False Claims Act, which allows private citizen whistleblowers to report on fraud against the government and share in the recovered amount.
Kapoor was charged with paying hundreds of thousands of dollars to doctors in exchange for their prescribing a spray called Subsys that contained fentanyl, a powerful opioid; Subsys is 100 times stronger than morphine and can cost tens of thousands of dollars a month. The scheme was brought to light by seven whistleblowers, most of whom were former employees of Insys. In August 2018, the government settled its civil case against Insys for $150 million, with the individual whistleblowers receiving a share of the recovery.
The parallel criminal case, in which Kapoor was charged with racketeering, a charge generally reserved for organized crime bosses, continued. Kapoor pleaded not guilty to all charges in November 2018.
The criminal case went to trial, and on May 2, after 15 days of deliberations, the jury found Kapoor and four co-conspirators guilty of racketeering. The jury found that Insys paid doctors to prescribe Subsys and then lied to insurance companies to ensure that their actions were concealed. Although the sentencing hearing has not yet been scheduled, Kapoor, who is 76 years old, faces up to 20 years in prison.
John Kapoor is the first major pharmaceutical executive to be convicted on criminal charges that relate to America’s opioid crises and overdose deaths. Other companies and their executives have been accused of similar practices.
In the trial, which lasted 10 weeks, the government portrayed Kapoor as caring about profits over the well-being of patients. According to the prosecution’s case, Insys allegedly sought doctors who already were above-average prescribers of opioids and invited them to participate in the company’s “speakers’ program.” As long as they continued to prescribe Subsys, doctors were paid high sums for their speeches, even if nobody showed up, federal prosecutors argued.
Insys also allegedly created a call center where its employees pretended to be employed by the doctors in the speakers’ program. Those employees allegedly then fabricated diagnoses to ensure that insurance carriers would cover the costs of the opioid drug.
At trial, Kapoor’s attorneys argued that he was uninvolved in and unaware of the illegal schemes, blaming several other former Insys executives, some of whom had already pleaded guilty in connection with related criminal actions. The jury seemingly rejected this argument.
The scandals have put Insys in dire financial straits, with the company announcing that “there is substantial risk surrounding our ability to continue … primarily due to mounting legal costs and uncertain legal settlement exposures.” The company’s stock has fallen 90 percent, compared to its 2015 all-time-high.
Several other former Insys executives, as well as former executives of other companies, are facing their own legal challenges. We here at RACmonitor will continue to keep you informed as to the various cases progress, in what has been described as a year of reckoning for executives of the pharmaceutical companies who have made and continue to make billions from opioids.
EDITOR’S NOTE: Artificial intelligence was utilized for structural refinement and grammatical editing. All analyses, interpretations, and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of
Now’s the time for to us to schedule those mammograms and colonoscopies we may have been putting off, but it is also a good time
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
