Have you or your coders ever gotten lost in the intricacies of coding for endoleaks in interventional radiology? Endoleaks, which occur post-graft placement to seal off an aneurysm, present unique challenges in coding accuracy. At MedLearn Media, our nationally renowned experts have identified this area as a critical review topic. This month, we explore the coding intricacies surrounding endoleaks and embolization.
When addressing an endoleak with embolization, it’s crucial to differentiate between codes 37242 and 37244. Contrary to common assumptions, an endoleak isn’t classified as a hemorrhage; rather, it represents a persistent “leakage” of blood into the aneurysm sac. This ongoing leakage can elevate pressure within the sac, potentially leading to a rupture if left unaddressed.
There are five types of endoleaks, thus the dictated report may indicate, for example, “Type 1 endoleak” or “Type 2 endoleak”; however, understand that the type of endoleak does not have an impact on your coding. You are responsible for identifying the type of treatment and code accordingly. Doing so might mean coding for stent-graft extensions, embolization of additional branches or vessels, or turning the patient over to vascular surgery after the diagnostic angiogram to allow for an open surgical procedure.
What causes a Type I endoleak is a gap between the endograft and the vessel wall at the point where it should be sealed. This circumstance allows blood to continue to leak into the aneurysm sac.
Type II endoleak is characterized when blood from a branch or side vessel that was not embolized continues to leak blood into the aneurysm. These are the most common types of endoleaks seen after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Embolizing this type of endoleak often requires a translumbar catheterization of the aorta, with subsequent catheterization into a lumbar artery or the IMA (36245). Or it may require catheterization into the SMA with subsequent maneuvering around the Arc of Riolan to get to the IMA (36247).
A Type III endoleak occurs when the graft is defective, or the components are misaligned. This enables blood flow to continue flowing to the aneurysm. Type IV endoleak results from an intentionally porous graft and occurs soon after some EVAR procedures. Type V endoleak is also called “endotension,” and the method/reason for this type of leak is unclear.
| 37241 | Vascular embolization or occlusion, inclusive of all radiological supervision and interpretation, intraprocedural road mapping, and imaging guidance necessary to complete the intervention; venous, other than hemorrhage (e.g., congenital or acquired venous malformations, venous and capillary hemangiomas, varices, varicoceles) |
Code 37241 is specific to venous embolization for clinical indications other than hemorrhage, tumors, or organ ischemia or infarction. As noted above, 37241 should not be assigned for extremity incompetent veins or spider veins. Examples of appropriate clinical indications for 37241 include:
Note that it is not appropriate to report code 37241 for embolization of accessory (side) branches of an AV dialysis graft. Take special note of code 36909 in the AV Dialysis Graft section for more information.
| 37242 | Vascular embolization or occlusion, inclusive of all radiological supervision and interpretation, intraprocedural road mapping, and imaging guidance necessary to complete the intervention; arterial, other than hemorrhage or tumor (e.g., congenital or acquired arterial malformations, arteriovenous malformations, arteriovenous fistulas, aneurysms, pseudoaneurysms) |
Coders may be wondering what code should be reported for extenuating circumstances and arterial embolization. Arterial embolization for reasons other than hemorrhage, tumor, organ ischemia or infarction is reported with code 37242. As noted in the code description, arterial malformations, AV malformations, AV fistulas, aneurysms, and pseudoaneurysms are appropriate clinical indications for 37242.
However, do not assign this code for injection of thrombin into an extremity pseudoaneurysm as that is appropriately coded as 36002.
When hepatic chemoembolization or radioembolization (Y-90) is planned, other arteries such as the gastroduodenal or left gastric may be embolized to keep the chemotherapy or isotope from reaching other organs. If these arteries are embolized at the same session as the hepatic chemoembolization or radioembolization, only one embolization code (37243) would be assigned although additional vascular catheterization codes could be added.
If these arteries are embolized at a session separate from the chemoembolization or radioembolization procedure, assign code 37242 (once) plus appropriate catheterization codes. Patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) stent graft may be found to have an endoleak requiring embolization.
As noted earlier, an endoleak is not considered hemorrhage but is rather continued filling of the aneurysm either through accessory arteries or because the stent graft has become malpositioned. Understand that embolization of the aneurysm or feeding vessel(s) resulting in the endoleak would be reported by 37242, not 37244. It may be necessary to approach the endoleak site by a translumbar injection, which would be coded 36160. However, the NCCI Policy Manual for Medicare Services prohibits assigning a non-selective catheterization code such as 36160 with the embolization codes.
These are NOT all the tips and tricks necessary to tackle endoleak interventional radiology coding.
As service volumes rebound and every dollar of reimbursement counts more than ever in the face of payment cuts, it’s imperative to make sure your CPT® coding is correct and compliant. Master more IR coding topics and break down the complexity with our expert-infused 2024 2024 Lower Extremity Interventional Radiology Coding webcast live on April 17, 2024, at 11:00 am, or on-demand past this date. This webcast is an essential training tool for both audio and visual learners.
One of my favorite resources is Insights, distributed by Kodiak. Let me begin by noting that I do not have any affiliation with Kodiak. I
Prior authorization has evolved from a payer checkpoint into a dominant force shaping clinical access, reimbursement, and patient experience. In 2025, hospitals and physician practices
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
