Providers and patients indicate that telehealth and substance use disorder treatment are priority issues.
With Election Day now behind us and Congress returning, the switch to the new legislative season, both federal and state, has begun. Looking ahead, we expect to see continued discussions surrounding both telehealth and substance use disorder treatment – and recent reports indicate that the two might work together better than one might expect!
A new study released by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) determined that virtual care during the pandemic both reduced individuals’ risk of overdose, as well as increased the use of medication-assisted treatment.
The biggest way that telehealth can impact substance use disorder treatment is honestly simple: by expanding access. Individuals are often unwilling or unable to seek substance use disorder treatment for the same reasons any individual can find it difficult to access healthcare: transportation issues, travel time to an office, lack of paid time off, or physical health constraints.
What is different about substance use disorders, however, is that telehealth also helps mitigate the stigma and shame surrounding the issue – many patients may find that a telehealth appointment is much more comfortable than being seen in an office. There has also historically been a shortage of providers offering necessary treatment, and telehealth has offered an extended reach for the providers that do.
But doctors and advocates alike note that there can also be unique challenges to providing substance use disorder treatment via telehealth, and that there may be a different model lawmakers should consider.
While treating substance use disorders virtually comes with the typical worries about providers missing body-language and nonverbal cues, as well as decreasing patient accountability, one of the specific risks of using telehealth to treat these disorders is the isolation it may bring.
Whether particularly enjoyable for the patient or not, there is a social aspect of coming into a doctor’s office or attending an in-person treatment group or group therapy. Additionally, the same stigma and shame that might make a patient more comfortable with virtual treatment can at the same time be a risk factor for patients not able to speak candidly if someone else is in the home with them during the appointment.
Many acknowledge that telehealth certainly has its time and place; when the results of the JAMA study came out, the American Telemedicine Association noted that this was “a strong signal to policymakers that telehealth can and should be a permanent part of healthcare delivery.” And indeed, a recent nationwide physician survey found that 85 percent of respondents were in favor of making telehealth permanent for the treatment of opioid use disorder, with 68 percent strongly in favor.
But it might be better to look at both telehealth and in-office visits as tools in the provider’s belt, rather than an all-encompassing solution, especially for issues as complex as substance use disorder. Providers can pick and choose which tool (or combination of tools) works best for each patient’s situation. Taking this idea, lawmakers are being encouraged to consider a hybrid model of treatment going forward.
As legislators gear up for busy terms in the coming months, they will need to consider how best to support healthcare for this vulnerable population – and remember that as a Board member of the American Telehealth Association stated recently when speaking on the subject, “laws often constitute a bridge from where our society is, to where we want it to go.”
Many providers and patients alike have indicated that telehealth and substance use disorder treatment are priority issues for them – so now it’s up to legislators to craft the bridge to that reality.
Hotly anticipated performance targets and payment amounts for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Advancing Chronic Care with Effective, Scalable Solutions (ACCESS) Model
I often begin my day with an environmental scan. Last week, an article from Becker’s Clinical Leadership caught my eye, “Hospital mortality, infectionrates improve despite
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
