The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has released a report on the Acute Hospital Care at Home (AHCAH) initiative, a program allowing select Medicare-certified hospitals to provide inpatient-level care within patients’ homes.
Originally launched to address hospital capacity challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, the initiative has continued under the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 (CAA), which extended the program’s flexibilities until Dec. 31, 2024. The recent report fulfills a mandate from the CAA to evaluate AHCAH and analyze its impact across multiple areas, including patient demographics, quality of care, and cost-effectiveness.
The study found that participating hospitals used a range of criteria to identify eligible AHCAH patients. These criteria, based on established hospital-at-home literature, ensure that selected patients are clinically appropriate for home care, and that their home environments are safe and conducive to receiving such care.
The report also highlighted demographic differences between AHCAH patients and traditional inpatients, showing that AHCAH patients were more likely to be white, live in urban areas, and have higher incomes, with fewer receiving Medicaid or low-income subsidies.
The report found that AHCAH primarily treated patients with a relatively small set of conditions, including respiratory and circulatory conditions, renal conditions, and infectious diseases. By grouping these conditions under MS-DRGs, CMS was able to compare treatment outcomes in AHCAH versus traditional inpatient settings. The findings provided insight into the types of cases that were most suitable for home-based acute care, suggesting that AHCAH may be particularly effective for certain known manageable conditions.
The CMS report also examined the quality of care provided under the AHCAH initiative. It assessed metrics like 30-day mortality rates, 30-day readmission rates, and the occurrence of hospital-acquired conditions (HACs). The findings indicate that AHCAH patients generally had lower mortality rates than their hospital-based counterparts.
Readmission rates, however, varied by condition, with AHCAH patients showing significantly higher rates for some conditions and lower rates for others; however, these specific conditions were not mentioned in the publicly released fact sheet. HAC rates were lower for AHCAH patients, although differences were not statistically significant.
When evaluating cost and utilization, the report focused on factors like length of stay, Medicare spending after discharge, and hospital service use, including telehealth services. AHCAH patients typically had longer lengths of stay, but incurred lower Medicare spending, in the 30 days following discharge. While these findings suggest cost benefits, the complex nature of AHCAH’s patient selection and clinical conditions makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about overall savings compared to inpatient hospital settings, according to CMS.
CMS hosted virtual listening sessions to gather feedback from patients and caregivers involved in AHCAH. The responses were generally positive, with patients appreciating the convenience and personal nature of home-based care. Clinicians, too, reported favorable experiences, which aligned with broader hospital-at-home research indicating high satisfaction rates among patients receiving care at home.
The report concluded with a need for further research and development, including refining cost, quality, and utilization metrics.
With the AHCAH initiative set to expire at the end of 2024, its continuation depends on future congressional action.
Programming note:
Listen to senior healthcare executive Tiffany Ferguson report this story live today during Talk Ten Tuesday with Chuck Buck and Dr. Erica Remer at 10 Eastern.
Healthcare has been transitioning toward a more digital, interconnected ecosystem for many years, but the pace and magnitude of current changes represent a fundamental shift.
H.R. 1 doesn’t directly rewrite ICD-10 or CPT, but it does change the environment in which you’re coding. The impact is mostly indirect – through
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
