Documentation and Coding for Intervertebral Disc Problems

It is estimated that 80 percent of Americans report back pain at one time or another, and treatment for such issues comes at a cost of $50 billion annually. Roughly 40 percent of those with back pain seek help from a primary care physician; another 40 percent see a chiropractor, and the remaining 20 percent find some other specialist for help. In theory, these providers should be selecting the same codes for the same conditions; however, documentation varies and the ICD-10-CM code set leaves some room for interpretation.

The conditions and diagnoses that accompany back pain vary widely. In younger adults (ages 20-60), problems with an intervertebral disc is likely to be the pain generator. In older adults (age 60+), the pain is more likely to stem from degenerative conditions such as osteoarthritis. The challenge for physicians is to make sure that they know how these conditions are organized in ICD-10-CM, and that the documentation provides the proper support.

Disorders

“Disc disorders” is a broad term used in the ICD-10-CM Tabular List to describe many problems associated with the spine. The disc disorder codes are separated into two categories: M50 for the cervical spine and M51 for the thoracic and lumbar spine. The following table (included here with permission from ChiroCode.com) includes an example for each subcategory to help providers and ancillary staff differentiate between the conditions included. For example, myelopathy involves a deficit to the spinal cord, whereas radiculopathy involves a deficit to the nerve roots. Providers should be careful to clearly distinguish the difference in their documentation. Myelopathy could include symptoms affecting the bowel and bladder, for example, and it is potentially much more serious and less common than radiculopathy, which typically only involves a single extremity.

Gwilliam Chiro 032817

The fifth character for each of these codes identifies a specific anatomic location. In 2017, sixth characters were added to some of the cervical codes to provide even more anatomic specificity. However, it should be noted that laterality is not identified by the codes even though radiculopathy is usually a unilateral condition.

Diagnostic Testing

If a provider uses a diagnosis code from these two categories, the record will likely contain diagnostic testing, such as:

• Deep tendon reflexes, muscle strength testing, and/or pinwheel testing to identify location and degree of nerve damage;
• Radiographs (X-ray), to look for bony changes that might indicate disc degeneration;
• Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to visualize the affected discs and nerves;
• CT scan with myelogram to visualize the affected discs and region of the cord; and
• Electro-myelogram (EMG) to measure muscle innervation deficits

If none of these tests are performed or documented, then the provider may not be able to establish certainty for the diagnosis and should consider a symptom code such as M54.5, Low back pain, and/or a code from the subcategory M54.1-, Radiculopathy, instead.

“Other”

M50.2- and M51.2- are the subcategories for “other disc displacement,” and this phrase has led to some confusion. “Displacement” is a very general term that does not distinguish between disc bulges or prolapses. However, it is notable that it does not mention nervous system involvement. Furthermore, when the ICD-10-CM code set uses the word “other,” it is essentially identifying what the condition isn’t, rather than what it is. It implies that the other codes in the category are for disc displacements as well, but this one does not fit those other descriptions. Therefore, this code might be applicable if a provider is certain, as confirmed on imaging studies, that a disc is displaced – but there is not any neurological involvement, such as with the myelopathy and radiculopathy codes.

Likewise, the M50.8- and M51.8- subcategories for “other disc disorders” suggest that none of the other codes in the category describe the type of disc problem that has been documented. Incidentally, it is very difficult to come up with an example of a disc problem that does not fit the choices available in the existing code set, so these codes may not be used very often.

Degeneration

Perhaps the most commonly used codes from these categories are M50.3- and M51.3- are for degeneration. Degeneration is a natural part of aging, and, over time, everyone will experience some changes to their intervertebral discs. For many of us, this can lead to back pain. Since degeneration involves a change in the appearance of the bone around the disc, it can often be visualized on an X-ray. As such, an X-ray report would commonly be found in the documentation when this diagnosis is used. If there are also neurological complications, then another code, such as one from the subcategory M47.2- spondylosis with radiculopathy, might be considered instead.

There are many, many more spine-related codes available in the ICD-10-CM Tabular List, but each category contains nuances and variables that providers and coders should consider as they learn to document and compare the code options. While code selection is important, documentation is ultimately king, and each diagnosis must be properly supported in order to justify reimbursement.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

I022426_SQUARE

Fracture Care Coding: Reduce Denials Through Accurate Coding, Sequencing, and Modifier Use

Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.

February 24, 2026
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24