Decoding Cancelled Surgery – When, Why, and What

Decoding Cancelled Surgery – When, Why, and What

I was recently presented with a case and asked about the proper way to handle it, and I thought it would be a good matter to cover here.

I have written about surgery in the past, but it is always worth another look, since such cases will show up in every hospital at some point.

This patient was an elderly female with a litany of the usual medical issues, including diabetes, chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, and atrial fibrillation. The planned procedure was placement of a left atrial occlusion device, the Watchman.

Of course, many of you could likely predict that my first question was “who is the insurer?” And as I think about it, in the past, we often presented cases by noting the patient’s race, such as “this 47-year-old black female.” But with the increasing realization that race-based decisions in healthcare have no data to support them, perhaps we should adjust to presenting cases by instead noting the payor, such as “this 67-year-old female, covered by a Blue Cross Medicare Advantage plan, presents with…” since their insurer can influence what care can be provided and who can provide it.  

In this case, the patient had traditional Medicare. So, the procedure was scheduled as inpatient, since the procedure was on the Medicare Inpatient-Only List (IPO). She arrived at the hospital and signed her Important Message from Medicare (IMM) and the myriad of other papers that we present to patients that no one ever reads. She was prepped for her procedure, taken to the procedure room, and anesthesia started. The transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probe was inserted, and it was noted that the dimensions of the left atrial appendage were such that the Watchman could not be used. The procedure was terminated, and the patient was awakened and discharged soon thereafter.

How do we handle this? We must look at two aspects of the case: admission status and billable services.

Should this visit be billed as an inpatient admission? That’s a reasonable question. This patient was appropriately scheduled as an inpatient, and on arrival she was formally admitted as an inpatient. But with every cancelled inpatient procedure, we need to ask: since it was cancelled, should the reason for the cancellation have been found before the patient even arrived? In this case, was a prior TEE done, with assessment of the size of the left atrial appendage? If so, how long ago? Should one have been done more recently to ensure that the patient was a Watchman candidate?

If there was a lapse here, you should not bill inpatient, but instead either do a quick Condition Code 44 change to outpatient – or self-deny and rebill to Part B. This would also be the proper action if in the pre-op area the patient reported a sore throat or fever, or a lab test was performed that was abnormal.

In fact, some hospitals have adopted a policy that an elective inpatient surgery patient is not considered formally admitted as an inpatient until the patient arrives in the operating room. This simplifies the situation wherein a condition found in pre-op leads to cancellation. Since the patient has not yet been formally admitted, the services provided in pre-op can be billed as outpatient services, avoiding the need for a Condition Code 44 change or self-denial and rebill. 

If the cancellation occurred after the procedure was commenced, and was truly unavoidable, such as the patient developing an arrythmia after anesthesia was induced or the patient developing unrelenting hypotension when the femoral catheter was placed, then it is appropriate to bill the inpatient admission.

Now that you know what admission status to bill, what services can go on the claim, be it an inpatient claim or an outpatient claim? Well, it should not have to be said that you cannot bill for the placement of the Watchman device with the appropriate ICD-10-PCS code, since the placement was not even started. If your operating room staff opened the Watchman packaging, you better hope that Boston Scientific will give you a refund, because the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) won’t pay you anything for a device that was never used. But the claim can include the codes for what was done: the work in pre-op, anesthesia services, the TEE (if done), the femoral artery catheter placement, and so on.

Then the complex payment rules kick in, be it inpatient or outpatient, and you get paid what you get paid. For an inpatient claim, the principal diagnosis in this case will be atrial fibrillation, and depending on which secondary diagnoses are coded, it will fall into DRGs 308 to 310, which have weights of 0.55 to 1.20. In comparison, if the Watchman was placed, the DRG would be 273 or 274, with weights of 3.24 or 3.90. Interestingly, if the device was attempted to be placed and it was unsuccessful, according to billing instructions from the manufacturer, and my attempts to assign the appropriate DRG based on the ICD-10-PCS codes, that would fall into DRG 228 or 229, which have weights of 3.18 and 5.04.  

For outpatient, the (nearly incomprehensible) Ambulatory Payment Classification (APC) payment rules apply, but the payment would likely be under $1,000, with the TEE paying about $526. In addition, depending on the point of cancellation, there may be modifiers that must be applied to specific services.

In summary, cancelled inpatient surgeries require special attention.

Be sure that the correct status and services are billed. Billing for an inpatient admission when the proper claim would be outpatient can lead to an overpayment with increased scrutiny. Ensuring that the claim uses the appropriate procedure codes, either ICD-10-PCS or HCPCS, is also crucial to ensure that the payment is appropriate.

Programming note:

Listen to Dr. Ronald Hirsch every Monday morning as he makes his rounds on Monitor Mondays, and sponsored by R-1, RCM at 10 Eastern with program host Chuck Buck.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, ACPA-C, CHCQM, CHRI

Ronald Hirsch, MD, is vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at R1 Physician Advisory Services. Dr. Hirsch’s career in medicine includes many clinical leadership roles at healthcare organizations ranging from acute-care hospitals and home health agencies to long-term care facilities and group medical practices. In addition to serving as a medical director of case management and medical necessity reviewer throughout his career, Dr. Hirsch has delivered numerous peer lectures on case management best practices and is a published author on the topic. He is a member of the Advisory Board of the American College of Physician Advisors, and the National Association of Healthcare Revenue Integrity, a member of the American Case Management Association, and a Fellow of the American College of Physicians. Dr. Hirsch is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is regular panelist on Monitor Mondays. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, policies, or opinions of R1 RCM, Inc. or R1 Physician Advisory Services (R1 PAS).

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Comprehensive Inpatient Clinical Documentation Integrity: From Foundations to Advanced Strategies

Comprehensive Outpatient Clinical Documentation Integrity: From Foundations to Advanced Strategies

Optimize your outpatient clinical documentation and gain comprehensive knowledge from foundational practices to advanced technologies, ensuring improved patient care and organizational and financial success. This webcast bundle provides a holistic approach to outpatient CDI, empowering you to implement best practices from the ground up and leverage advanced strategies for superior results. You will gain actionable insights to improve documentation quality, patient care, compliance, and financial outcomes.

September 5, 2024
Advanced Outpatient Clinical Documentation Integrity: Mastering Complex Narratives and Compliance

Advanced Outpatient Clinical Documentation Integrity: Mastering Complex Narratives and Compliance

Enhancing outpatient clinical documentation is crucial for maintaining accuracy, compliance, and proper reimbursement in today’s complex healthcare environment. This webcast, presented by industry expert Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, will provide you with actionable strategies to tackle complex challenges in outpatient documentation. You’ll learn how to craft detailed clinical narratives, utilize advanced EHR features, and implement accurate risk adjustment and HCC coding. The session also covers essential regulatory updates to keep your documentation practices compliant. Join us to gain the tools you need to improve documentation quality, support better patient care, and ensure financial integrity.

September 12, 2024

Foundations of Outpatient Clinical Documentation Integrity: Best Practices for Accurate Coding and Compliance

This webcast, presented by Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, a recognized expert with over 30 years of experience, offers essential strategies to improve outpatient clinical documentation integrity. You will learn how to enhance the accuracy and completeness of patient records by adopting best practices in coding and incorporating Social Determinants of Health (SDOH). The session also highlights the role of technology, such as EHRs and CDI software, in improving documentation quality. By attending, you will gain practical insights into ensuring precise and compliant documentation, supporting patient care, and optimizing reimbursement. This webcast is crucial for those looking to address documentation gaps and elevate their coding practices.

September 5, 2024
Preventing Sepsis Denials: From Recognition to Clinical Validation

Preventing Sepsis Denials: From Recognition to Clinical Validation

ICD10monitor has teamed up with renowned CDI expert Dr. Erica Remer to bring you an exclusive webcast on how to recognize sepsis, how to get providers to give documentation that will support sepsis, and how to educate to avert sepsis denials. Register now and become a crucial piece of the solution to standardizing sepsis clinical practice, documentation, and coding at your facility.

August 22, 2024

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Post Operative Pain Blocks: Guidelines, Documentation, and Billing to Protect Your Facility

Post Operative Pain Blocks: Guidelines, Documentation, and Billing to Protect Your Facility

Protect your facility from unwanted audits! Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, and take a deep dive into both the CMS and AMA guidelines for reporting post operative pain blocks. You’ll learn how to determine if the nerve block is separately codable with real life examples for better understanding. Becky will also cover how to evaluate whether documentation supports medical necessity, offer recommendations for stronger documentation practices, and provide guidance on educating providers about documentation requirements. She’ll include a discussion of appropriate modifier and diagnosis coding assignment so that you can be confident that your billing of post operative pain blocks is fully supported and compliant.

October 24, 2024
The OIG Update: Targets and Tools to Stay in Compliance

The OIG Update: Targets and Tools to Stay in Compliance

During this RACmonitor webcast Dr. Ronald Hirsch spotlights the areas of the OIG’s Work Plan and the findings of their most recent audits that impact utilization review, case management, and audit staff. He also provides his common-sense interpretation of the prevailing regulations related to those target issues. You’ll walk away better equipped with strategies to put in place immediately to reduce your risk of paybacks, increased scrutiny, and criminal penalties.

September 19, 2024
Pediatric SDoH: An Essential Guide to Accurate Coding and Reporting

Pediatric SDoH: An Essential Guide to Accurate Coding and Reporting

This webcast, presented by Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, addresses the critical gap in Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) reporting for pediatric populations. While SDoH efforts often focus on adults, this session emphasizes the unique needs of children. Attendees will gain insights into the current state of SDoH, new pediatric Z-codes, and the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration. By understanding and applying pediatric-specific SDoH factors, healthcare professionals can improve data capture, compliance, and care outcomes. This webcast is essential for those looking to enhance their approach to pediatric SDoH reporting and coding.

August 8, 2024
Oncology and E/M Services: Compliance, Medical Necessity, and Reimbursement

Oncology and E/M Services: Compliance, Medical Necessity, and Reimbursement

Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, VP of CDM, for a webcast addressing oncology service coding challenges. Learn to navigate coding for infusions and injections alongside Evaluation and Management (E/M) services, ensuring compliance and accurate reimbursement. Gain insights into documenting E/M services for oncology patients and determining medical necessity. This webcast is essential to optimize coding practices, maintain compliance, and maximize revenue in oncology care.

July 30, 2024

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →