Audit and regulatory challenges that were ever-present in years past only seem primed to increase over the new year.
The long-awaited implementation of the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Patient Assessment Instrument (IRF-PAI) 4.0 will occur for all discharges on or after Oct. 1, 2022. In case you missed it, the change was included in the 2022 Home Health Final Rule – an interesting place to address it. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) believes that IRFs now have the resources needed for training, updates, and workflow to complete the updated assessments. Additionally, we believe that this is a strong indication of CMS’s focus on moving forward with data collection to address the social determinants of health (SDoH), as updated quality measurements include several of them.
Next up, in the December MedPAC public meeting, there was a recommendation for a 5-percent reduction in Medicare payment for IRFs in FY 2022. This recommendation is consistent with update reports from earlier in 2021. While we have seen this same recommendation for payment reduction for several consecutive years, there appears to be strong support from several of the commissioners, based on their questions and comments, as noted in the meeting transcript, and this issue certainly bears watching. The Commission did acknowledge increased costs associated with COVID in 2022.
And if payment pushback isn’t enough, we have a pending demonstration project that would require 100-percent review of IRF claims in a certain sample group. The Proposed Review Choice Demonstration for IRFs is still looming, and will have a significant impact. The comment period that ended in October featured extremely strong opposition from both provider and patient advocacy groups, for many reasons, including the impact of the public health emergency (PHE) and patient access to care. If implemented, the demonstration would last five years, beginning with four states – Alabama, Pennsylvania, Texas, and California – and expand to all IRFs located in states covered by Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) jurisdictions JJ, JL, JH, and JE. So, if your MAC is Noridian, Novitas, or Palmetto, you would eventually be involved. Each IRF would choose either 100-percent pre-claim review or 100-percent post-payment review, and would be locked into this method until they meet the 90-percent threshold for affirmation. The review would cover six-month cycles. If the IRF reaches 90-percent affirmation based on a minimum of 10 pre-claim requests or claims submitted, they may opt-out of future reviews, except for a 5-percent spot-check of claims.Â
And of course, as we’ve already heard, there are ongoing audits. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) continues to review IRF claims, with alarming denial rates mainly due to “medical necessity,” often based on claims for which the IRF did not demonstrate at the time of admission that the patient met the requirements noted in the Medicare Benefits Policy Manual. Targeted Probe-and-Educate (TPE) audits, routine MAC audits, Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) audits, and Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) reviews continue, and the denial reasons are fairly consistent across the reviews. If there is such as term as “appeal fatigue,” I suspect that IRFs are experiencing it.
Finally, IRFs need to continue to evaluate how they support quality patient care and throughput, as we continue through the COVID PHE, including COVID-specific rehab programs and utilization of the available waivers – which we predict, will be extended.Â
Beyond the regulatory issues, IRFs are also experiencing workforce issues – another challenge in providing quality care.
Your focus for 2022 should include reviewing your processes for the updated IRF-PAI, checking your documentation – particularly the preadmission assessment – to be certain it supports the admission as reasonable and necessary, and be prepared to appeal while continuing to be on the watch for changes.
All things considered, 2022 looks to be a challenging year for all of us, so buckle up, strap on your helmet, and get ready for another wild ride.
H.R. 1 doesn’t directly rewrite ICD-10 or CPT, but it does change the environment in which you’re coding. The impact is mostly indirect – through
In the CY 2026 Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Final Rule, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) made significant changes to the applicable use
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24Â
