COVID-19 and Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH) versus Sepsis

In practice, doctors may use these terms synonymously.

We are in the midst of a COVID-19 global pandemic that is changing the world as we know it. Most COVID-19 patients may not need acute inpatient care admission. Only the sickest will. These are the patients who undergo a cytokine storm (aka cytokine release syndrome, or CRS) and develop secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH), which causes acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ARDS causes ~50 percent mortality in these patients. Cytokine storms are seen in sepsis, non-infectious SIRS, macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), and secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. There are specific codes for those, but they follow similar pathophysiology and can be confused for one another.

In practice, doctors may use these terms synonymously. For example, they may use the term “septic shock” for patients who go into shock for non-infectious SIRS. When clinical documentation specialists and coders see “septic shock,” they may come to the wrong conclusion that a patient has sepsis, when it’s really non-infectious SIRS. The same scenario can happen in COVID-19 with sHLH, which may lead to confusion, queries, and inappropriate coding of CRS and sepsis, in their mission to capture more severity of illness (SOI) and major complications/comorbid conditions (MCCs). When one sees a patient with fever and organ failure(s) who satisfies sepsis criteria, they are already conditioned to think and ask for sepsis! 

You may ask, “so what?” Well, modes of therapy will be different, and mortality rates are also different. See the following excerpt from a National Institutes of Health (NIH) article (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19325510/):

SHLH features “can also commonly be found in patients with sepsis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). Nevertheless, the therapeutic options for these are radically different.

Chemotherapy and bone marrow transplant have been used for treatment of HLH/SHLH, whereas antibiotics and supportive treatment are used in severe sepsis/SIRS and MODS. MAS is treated with limited immune suppression. Outcomes are also different; SHLH has a mortality rate around 50 percent, whereas pediatric septic shock and MODS have a mortality of 10.3 percent and 18 percent, respectively, and severe sepsis in previously healthy children has a mortality rate of 2 percent. MAS has a mortality rate between 8 percent and 22 percent.”

To summarize, cytokine release syndromes (CRS) have different types (e.g., sepsis, non-infectious SIRS, MAS, sHLH, etc.) with similar pathogenesis, but they need to be delineated in data.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Ask Dr. Hirsch: Clarifying Medicare’s Most Misunderstood Rules – Part 2

Medicare regulations are complex and even seasoned professionals struggle to apply them consistently. Due to overwhelming demand, Dr. Hirsch returns for Part 2 of Ask Dr. Hirsch: Clarifying Medicare’s Most Misunderstood Rules to answer even more of Medicare’s most misunderstood questions, covering inpatient status, observation, SNF access, Medicare Advantage denials, and more. Join Dr. Hirsch as he provides clear, referenced answers to real-world questions submitted by your peers, helping you navigate Medicare compliance with confidence and clarity.

June 18, 2026

Reengineering Utilization Management: Building an Adaptive Model for the New Payer Era

Traditional utilization management models can no longer keep pace with regulatory shifts, payer scrutiny, and operational pressures. In this webcast, Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, ACPA-C, introduces an Adaptive Model strategy that modernizes UM through role specialization, technology-driven workflows, and proactive, team-based processes. Attendees will learn how to restructure programs to improve efficiency, strengthen clinical collaboration, and enhance financial performance in a rapidly changing healthcare environment.

May 20, 2026

Compliance for the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility (IPF-PPS): Minimizing Federal Audit Findings by Strengthening Best Practices

Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.

April 9, 2026

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

This Memorial Day, we honor those who gave all for our freedom. Take 20% off sitewide through May 29 with code MEMORIAL26 at checkout

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24